Characterizing Recurrence Following Hybrid Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

PURPOSE: It is widely accepted that atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for half of arrhythmia recurrences following endocardial catheter ablation of AF. An epicardial-endocardial approach (hybrid) has emerged as an alternative to endocardial ablation alone for the treatment of AF, yet recurrence after a hybrid procedure has not been well characterized. This retrospective study is aimed at characterizing recurrence following hybrid ablation for patients with persistent AF. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF (N=108) received both endocardial and epicardial ablation of the posterior left atrial wall using catheter ablation and a small midline surgical approach (hybrid). Presence of atrial flutter or AF was determined with ambulatory monitoring (n=22) or electrocardiogram analysis (n=86) at each follow-up visit. Recurrence mode was confirmed by electrophysiology study for those patients undergoing subsequent catheter ablation after hybrid ablation. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a mean ± standard deviation of 25 ± 14 months. Of patients who had a recurrence, 53% (n=33) were in atrial flutter and 47% (n=29) were in AF. Of those who had a recurrence with atrial flutter, 14 received repeat ablation for either left (n=11) or left/right (n=3) atrial flutter and 3 received AF ablation. Half of ablations for atrial flutter recurrence following the hybrid procedure involved the mitral isthmus. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial flutter accounts for about half of arrhythmia recurrences post-hybrid ablation. If catheter ablation of the mitral isthmus is considered during the hybrid procedure to prevent subsequent occurrence of perimitral flutter, bidirectional block must be performed to ensure a complete line of block.

Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Roof and Posterior Wall Debulking Using Navik 3D™: A New Technique for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

The success rates of traditional endocardial ablation techniques for managing atrial fibrillation remain modest. Recently, the performance of posterior wall ablation in conjunction with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been reported to increase the chance of success following endocardial ablation. We report a systematic approach for the isolation of the PVs and ablation of the left atrial roof and posterior wall using a cryoballoon guided by the novel Navik 3D™ mapping system (APN Health LLC, Waukesha, WI, USA) and offer preliminary data including procedure, fluoroscopy, and cryoablation times for review. Patients (n = 52) aged 63 years ± 10 years with paroxysmal (n = 42), persistent (n = 11), or chronic (n = 2) atrial fibrillation underwent cryoballoon ablation for PVI and/or the left atrial roof, posterior wall, anterior ganglion plexi (GP), or mitral isthmus line. Lesions were accurately delivered to the PVs, left atrial roof, posterior wall, anterior GP, or mitral isthmus line as appropriate. Acute PVI was achieved in 98% of all patients, and eight (15%) required direct current cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm at the end of the procedure. The mean ± standard deviation procedure, fluoroscopy, and cryoballoon ablation times were 149 minutes ± 39 minutes, 33 minutes ± 30 minutes, and 41 minutes ± 14 minutes, respectively. The Navik 3D™ mapping system is believed to be the only available mapping system that allows for the visualization and location of the cryoballoon in three dimensions, enabling the operator to deliver contiguous, overlapping lesions on the roof and posterior wall of the left atrium. It also facilitates precise measurement of the distance between the esophageal temperature probe and the cryoballoon, thereby helping to avoid freezing damage to the esophagus.

Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Ablation Versus Endocardial Catheter Ablation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of hybrid ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation alone were evaluated in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Variable outcomes exist following endocardial catheter ablation in medically refractory patients with persistent AF. A hybrid epicardial-endocardial approach has emerged as an alternative to endocardial ablation. METHODS: In 133 consecutive patients, 69 received endocardial ablation alone (pulmonary vein isolation and radiofrequency catheter ablation [endo group]) and 64 received endocardial catheter ablation and epicardial ablation (hybrid group). Recurrence was defined as any arrhythmia following the 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median of 16 months. The hybrid and endo groups were similar in age (61 ± 10 years vs. 62 ± 8 years), body mass index (35 ± 6 kg/m2 vs. 35 ± 7 kg/m2), CHA2D2-VASc score (2 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1), and ejection fraction (54 ± 11% vs. 53 ± 8%). The hybrid group had longer AF duration (median [interquartile range (IQR)] (12 months [IQR: 8 to 28 months] vs. 7 months [IQR: 5 to 12 months]; p < 0.001) and more previous ablations (58% vs. 25%; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar antiarrhythmic drug use at follow-up (55% vs. 48%). The hybrid group was less likely to have recurrence (37% vs. 58%; p = 0.013) and repeat ablation (9% vs. 26%; p = 0.012), and had an AF-free survival of 72% versus 51% (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with persistent AF, hybrid ablation is associated with less AF recurrence and fewer re-do ablations. Prospective large-scale randomized trials are needed to validate these results.