[Prognosis of unstable angina resulting from restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty of saphenous vein grafts]. / Prognozirovanie nestabil'noi stenokardii vsledstvie restenoza posle chreskozhnoi angioplastiki venoznykh shuntov.

AIM: To assess frequency of unstable angina due to restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty of venous grafts and to elucidate risk factors of its development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Percutaneous interventions were successfully performed in 100 out of 106 patients with venous graft stenoses. These patients were followed up for 17+/-11 (maximum 36) months. RESULTS: Unstable angina due to venous graft restenosis developed in 24% of patients. Patients with unstable angina compared with those without were characterized by higher frequency of hyperlipidemia (83 vs. 51%, respectively, p=0.032), lower rate of stenting (46 and 72%, respectively, p=0.032), greater residual stenosis (15+/-13 and 9+/-8%, respectively, p=0.008). At multifactorial regression analysis the following factors were significant predictors of unstable angina: hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-8.39), and residual stenosis after intervention (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p=0.04). In a subgroup of patients with hyperlipidemia there was a tendency to greater rate of unstable angina among patients not taking statins compared with users of statin (50 and 29%, respectively, p=0.083). CONCLUSION: Unstable angina developed in (1/4) of patients after balloon dilatation of venous grafts and hyperlipidemia was its most powerful predictor.

[Clinical, angiographical, and procedural causes of acute vessel closure during transluminal coronary intervention]. / Klinicheskie, angiograficheskie i protsedurnye prichiny vnezapnogo zakrytiia sosuda vo vremia transliuminal'nogo koronarnogo vmeshatel'stva.

AIM: To elucidate factors related to acute vessel closure (AVC) after transluminal coronary intervention. METHODS: From population of 10439 patients subjected to transluminal coronary intervention 2 groups were formed: with (n=885) and without (n=885) acute vessel closure (AVC). Twenty five clinical, angiographical and procedural characteristics of patients of these 2 groups were included into mono and multifactorial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The following factors were univariate predictors of acute vessel closure: smoking [odds ratio (OR) 1.42], unstable angina (OR=2.130, acute myocardial infarction within previous 24 hours (OR 2.76), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.31), urgent procedure (OR 1.94), eccentric stenosis (OR 1.67), calcified lesion (OR 2.21), preexisting thrombosis (OR 3.79), lacerated complicated stenosis (OR 2.02), tortuous lesion (OR 1.35), low operator experience (OR 3.37), balloon angioplasty as sole procedure (OR 1.66), concomitant rheolytic thrombectomy (OR 1.95), urgent stenting (OR 1.45). Elective stenting significantly lowered risk of acute vessel thrombosis. Multifactorial step-up analysis selected the following independent predictors of AVC: smoking, acute myocardial infarction within previous 24 hours, cardiogenic shock, preexisting thrombosis, lacerated complicated stenosis, and concomitant rheolytic thrombus extraction. Thus only elective stenting significantly reduced risk of AVC.

[Effectiveness of excimer laser coronary angioplasty in treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis]. / Effektivnost' éksimernoi lazernoi koronarnoi angioplastiki v lechenii bol'nykh s restenozom posle koronarnogo stentirovaniia.

In-stent restenosis (ISR), when treated with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) alone, has an angiographic recurrence rate of 30-85%. Ablating the hypertrophic neointimal tissue prior to PTCA is an attractive alternative, however late outcomes of such treatment have not been fully determined. This multicenter case control study assessed angiographic and clinical outcomes of 137 consecutive procedures in 125 patients treated for ISR with either PTCA alone (n = 58) or excimer laser assisted coronary angioplasty (ELCA, n = 67). Demographics were similar. Lesions selected for ELCA compared with those selected for \PTCA were longer (17.1+/-9.9 mm vs. 13.6+/-9.1 mm; p=0,034), more complex (ACC/AHA type C: 36,5% vs. 14,3%; p=0,006), and with reduced antegrade flow (TIMI flow < 3: 18,9% vs. 4,8%; p = 0,025). ELCA- and PTCA treated patients had similar rates of procedural success (98,5 and 98,3%, respectively, p=1,0), major clinical complications (3,0% and 8,6%; respectively, NS), major cardiac events at 1 year (37,3 and 46,6%. respectively, NS), and target lesion revascularization (32,8 and. 34,5%; respectively, NS). These data suggest that ELCA in patients with complex in-stent restenosis is as safe and effective as PTCA. Despite higher lesion complexity in ELCA-treated patients, no increase in event rates was observed.