Social Media Posts About Distal Radius Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Social media offers a popular, unfiltered source of patient and provider perspectives on health care. This study investigated the characteristics of social media posts referencing distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: Content was queried from Instagram from February 06, 2019, to December 08, 2021, using the hashtags "#distalradiusfracture" and "#wristfracture." The 1500 most-liked posts were analyzed. Poster demographics including age, gender, region, laterality, and treatment type and post characteristics including post type, number, content, timing relative to treatment, tone, and satisfaction were examined. Variables were compared using χ2 tests. Univariate, multivariate, and stepwise regression were performed. RESULTS: The most popular post formats were single photo (44.5%), multiple photos (32.3%), and single video (13.9%). Patients (40.3%) were the most common poster followed by surgeons (33.4%). Men (48.7%) and women (51.3) were evenly represented. Of the total posts, 87.7% depicted the post-treatment phase of care; 54.8% of posts depicted operative management, while 26.6% depicted non-operative management; and 73.7% of posts were positive in tone, 18.7% neutral, and 7.6% negative. Univariate analysis demonstrated that posters who were patients, friends/family of patients, female, and posts with >100 "likes" were more likely to share negative tones. Multivariate and stepwise regression were consistent with the above. CONCLUSION: Most posts regarding DRF originate from patients, are post-treatment, and are positive. Negative tone is associated with posts from patients, family/friends of patients, female posters, and posts with >100 likes. With this information, surgeons will be better prepared to address patient concerns, manage expectations, and actively participate in social media themselves.

Do Race and Socioeconomic Status Affect Date of Initial Presentation and Repair of Patients with Cleft lip ± Palate and Head Shape Conditions?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate regarding the effect of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on the timing of cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P), craniosynostosis, and plagiocephaly presentation to clinic and possible repair. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with CL ± P and head shape conditions from Jan 2001 to Feb 2022 were included. Age at first plastic surgery clinic appointment, age at repair if applicable, gender, race, and zip code were collected. The Validated Child Opportunity Index (COI) scale was calculated based on zip code as a measure of SES. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunn's procedures were used for continuous variables and post hoc pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: 2733 patients with CL ± P, 9974 with plagiocephaly/brachycephaly, and 59 patients with craniosynostosis were included. Among patients with CL ± P, Black and Hispanic patients presented significantly later to both first plastic surgery clinic appointment and age at repair than White patients (P < .001). White patients and higher SES were associated with a significantly earlier date of initial presentation to plastic surgery clinic for head shape conditions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Race and SES may play an important role in the delay of first presentation to plastic surgery clinic and subsequent repair for these patient populations. Further educational efforts must be provided to ensure equitable care. This single institutional study may serve to encourage other academic centers to analyze the timing of care for our pediatric patients.

Sex matters: impact on pathogenesis, presentation and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as do most chronic inflammatory disorders, displays unique features and confers different risk factors in male and female patients. Importantly, sex-based differences in IBD exist for epidemiological incidence and prevalence among different age groups, with men and women developing distinct clinical symptoms and disparity in severity of disease. In addition, the presentation of comorbidities in IBD displays strong sex differences. Notably, particular issues exclusive to women's health, including pregnancy and childbirth, require specific considerations in female patients with IBD of childbearing age that can have a substantial influence on clinical outcomes. This Review summarizes the latest findings regarding sex-based differences in the epidemiology, clinical course, comorbidities and response to current therapies in patients with IBD. Importantly, the latest basic science discoveries in this area of investigation are evaluated to provide insight into potential mechanisms underlying the influence of sex on disease pathogenesis, as well as to design more personalized and efficacious care, in patients with IBD.