Smartphone Otoscopy Performed by Parents.

Introduction:Implementation of pediatric telemedicine has been emphasized. We examined whether parents could perform smartphone otoscopy for the diagnosis of otitis media.Materials and Methods:We included children (6-35 months) attending day care with at least one episode of acute otitis media (AOM) within 90 days of the study entry. The timing for a teaching intervention was randomized. In the immediate teaching group, parents were taught smartphone otoscopy and cerumen was removed at the first visit. The delayed teaching group received the teaching intervention after 1 week's independent use. During the 60 study days, parents performed home examinations. The main outcome, the diagnostic quality of the tympanic membrane videos to determine healthy ear, otitis media with effusion (OME) and AOM diagnoses was measured with a structured video analysis independently by three physicians. Parents' experience was measured with a questionnaire.Results:AOM could be detected or excluded in 87% (609/699) of the videos during acute symptoms. After the teaching intervention, healthy ear, OME, or AOM could be diagnosed in 40% (521/1,293) of the videos. During the first week's intervention, one of the three diagnoses was attained in 33% (50/153) and in 12% (22/179) of the videos in the immediate and delayed teaching group, respectively (p < 0.001). The performance of the smartphone otoscopy examination was easy in 85% (35/41) of families.Discussion:After been taught, parents are able to perform smartphone otoscopy for the remote detection or exclusion of AOM.Conclusions:Future studies should assess the clinical usefulness of parent-performed smartphone otoscopy.

Can changes in parentally measured acoustic reflectometry levels predict the middle ear status?

OBJECTIVE: Spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) may be used to detect middle ear effusion. Our aim was to investigate whether increasing SG-AR levels between two SG-AR examinations indicate deterioration from a healthy middle ear to acute otitis media (AOM). METHODS: We enrolled 185 children (age 6-35 months) whose parents were willing to use the SG-AR at home daily. Measurement pairs of parental home SG-AR examination results were generated and analyzed. There was one SG-AR examination result obtained within ±1 day of the reference visit and another result within ±1 day of the subsequent visit. We defined the SG-AR level as increasing when the difference between two measurements was ≥2 levels from a lower to a higher level, suggesting development of AOM. When the SG-AR level difference was ≤1, we defined this no change of the SG-AR level. The middle ear diagnosis was determined by pneumatic otoscopy at the study clinic. RESULTS: 361 paired SG-AR home measurements were obtained. The reference measurement was related to a healthy middle ear as determined by pneumatic otoscopy. Increasing SG-AR levels (59/361), were 63% (95% CI 50%-74%) sensitive and 94% (91%-97%) specific for deterioration of a healthy middle ear to AOM. The positive predictive value was 71% (58%-82%) and the negative predictive value was 92% (88%-95%). When there was no SG-AR level difference between the SG-AR examinations, the corresponding figures were 88% (95% CI 84%-92%), 69% (56%-79%), 93% (89%-95%) and 57% (45%-68%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that increasing SG-AR levels might not be sufficiently sensitive to detect deterioration of the middle ear status from healthy middle ear to AOM in symptomatic children. Importantly, however, the development of AOM seems to be unlikely in an initially healthy middle ear when there is no difference between the SG-AR levels in two separate measurements.

Parental role in the diagnostics of otitis media: can layman parents use spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry reliably?

OBJECTIVE: Spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) can be used to detect middle ear effusion (MEE). Since both families and primary health care systems carry the burden of otitis media, our aim was to determine whether layman parents could be taught to use the SG-AR reliably. METHODS: We enrolled 359 children (age 6-35 months) whose parents were willing to use SG-AR at home. The parents were asked to perform bilateral SG-AR daily on their child. In this study, we included children who had undergone successful parental home SG-AR examination performed on the same day that a physician had also performed successful SG-AR examination and pneumatic otoscopy at the study clinic. We compared the parental and study physician SG-AR examination results to the study physicians' pneumatic otoscopy, which served as the diagnostic standard. RESULTS: We analyzed 571 successful parental home SG-AR examinations performed on the same day that a study physician had performed a successful SG-AR examination and pneumatic otoscopy at the study clinic. None of the evaluated SG-AR level combinations resulted in both high sensitivity and specificity. For symptomatic visits, the negative predictive value of a parental SG-AR level 1 to detect MEE was 64%. For parental SG-AR levels 4-5, the positive predictive value to detect MEE was 88%. However, for asymptomatic visits, the negative predictive value of a parental SG-AR level 1 to detect MEE was 83%. CONCLUSION: This study showed that layman parents are able to use the SG-AR technically successfully. In symptomatic children, parentally obtained SG-AR level 1 examination is not adequate to exclude MEE. However, parentally obtained SG-AR levels 4-5 do indicate the presence of MEE. At the same time, in asymptomatic children, parentally obtained SG-AR level 1 examination seems to indicate a healthy middle ear. From the perspective of primary care, the implementation of parental SG-AR examinations in the diagnostic chain of otitis media would be intriguing. This study showed that the possibilities lie in the follow up of the resolution of MEE after an episode of OM in asymptomatic children. However, it seems that currently, the SG-AR technique is an obstacle for wider clinical implementation.

Parental role in the diagnostics of otitis media: can parents be taught to use tympanometry reliably?

OBJECTIVE: Tympanometry can be used to detect middle ear effusion (MEE). As the need for rearrangement of clinical resources at the primary care level increases, it is important to determine whether layman parents could be taught to use the tympanometer reliably, aiming to reduce unnecessary physician visits during respiratory tract infections. METHODS: From our AOM treatment trial we enrolled 78 children (age 6-35 months) who had persistent MEE, parents were voluntary and willing to use a tympanometer at home, the child was sufficiently co-operative, and parents learned technically the use of the tympanometer. At home, parents were asked to perform daily bilateral tympanometry on their child. We included those parental tympanometric examinations, to which the corresponding tympanometric examination, within one day by a study physician was available. Parental tympanometric examinations were compared to the pneumatic otoscopy by a study physician which served as the diagnostic standard. RESULTS: This study involved 78 children and a total of 432 parental tympanometric examinations. From these 432 examinations, parents obtained an interpretable tympanogram in 83% (359/432) and physicians in 91% (393/432) (absolute rate difference 8%, 95% CI 3-12%). Both obtained an interpretable tympanogram from the same ear in 75% (326/432) of the tympanometric examinations. Of these 326 interpretable examinations, parents and physicians were in accordance with either a peaked or a flat tympanogram in 88% of examinations (288/326) (kappa-value 0.77). When the tympanogram was peaked, pneumatic otoscopy indicated healthy middle ear in 72% (122/169) of parental and in 69% (149/217) of study physicians' tympanometric examinations (absolute rate difference 4%, 95% CI -6% to 13%). When the tympanogram was flat, pneumatic otoscopy indicated any MEE in 92% of parental (174/190) and in 96% (169/176) of study physicians' tympanometric examinations (absolute rate difference 4%, 95% CI -9% to 1%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that layman parents are able to use tympanometry technically successfully, and that the parental tympanometric examinations are as reliable as those obtained by study physicians.