A Balanced Risk-Benefit Analysis to Determine Human Risks Associated with Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PA)-The Case of Herbal Medicinal Products Containing St. John's Wort Extracts (SJW).

OBJECTIVES: Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) exist ubiquitously in our environment. More than 6000 plants, about 3% of the world’s flowering plants, are known to synthesize PA. As a consequence, many herbal ingredients, including St. John’s wort (SJW), are contaminated with PA that can possess acute and subchronic toxic effects as well as mutagenic and genotoxic properties. Therefore, the possible benefits of SJW as an herbal remedy against depression need to be weighed against the possible risks of unwanted PA intake. METHODS: We searched the literature regarding the current knowledge on PA and evaluated the evidence on the antidepressant effects of quantified SJW extract based on a Cochrane Review and the current practice guidelines on depression. Risks are depicted in form of a risk ladder and benefits in form of an icon array. RESULTS: Evidence from clinical studies indicates that quantified SJW extract is an effective treatment option for mild to moderate depression with fewer side effects than conventional antidepressants. Health statistics from different countries do not quantify cases of death caused by PA intake. However, deaths due to suicide, often triggered by depression, are common (11 in 1000 in Germany in 2015) and rank between fatalities due to liver diseases (16 in 1000) and household accidents (10 in 1000). CONCLUSIONS: Quantified SJW extract is a safe and effective treatment option, and its potential of treating depression outweighs the (hypothetical) risk of unwanted PA intake.

A Balanced Risk-Benefit Analysis to Determine Human Risks Associated with Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PA)-The Case of Tea and Herbal Infusions.

Humans are exposed to pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) through different sources, mainly from contaminated foodstuff. Teas and herbal infusions (T&HI) can be contaminated by PA producing weed. PA can possess toxic, mutagenic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic properties. Thus, possible health risks for the general population are under debate. There is a strong safety record for T&HI and additionally epidemiological evidence for the preventive effects of regular tea consumption on cardiovascular events and certain types of cancer. There is no epidemiological evidence, however, for human risks of regular low dose PA exposure. Recommended regulatory PA-threshold values are based on experimental data only, accepting big uncertainties. If a general risk exists through PA contaminated T&HI, it must be small compared to other frequently accepted risks of daily living and the proven health effects of T&HI. Decision making should be based on a balanced riskbenefit analysis. Based on analyses of the scientific data currently available, it is concluded that the benefits of drinking T&HI clearly outweigh the negligible health risk of possible PA contamination. At the same time, manufacturers must continue their efforts to secure good product quality and to be transparent on their measures of quality control and risk communication.

Quality of life diagnosis and therapy as complex intervention for improvement of health in breast cancer patients: delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements (modeling).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A system for quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapy in breast cancer patients was developed according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework of complex interventions. Along MRC's five phases in the continuum of evidence, the present paper deals with phase I: modeling (i.e., delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements). BASIC ELEMENTS: Theoretical background is a new conceptualization of QoL that provides a rational basis to diagnose "diseased" QoL. A care pathway as the central part of modeling is composed of the following interrelated structural elements: patients (n = 170), clinicians (n = 10), experts in a quality of life unit (n = 5), coordinating practitioners (n = 38), local opinion leaders (n = 12), and professional therapists for QoL enhancing therapies (n = 75). Networking of these structural elements was achieved by clinical algorithm. In the clinical center, the patient and doctor delivered a questionnaire (EORTC) and health status report. The QoL unit transformed it into a profile and experts' report. The coordinating practitioner transformed the latter into a decision on QoL therapy and the care pathway ended with the professional therapists. Implementation of this system used a multifaceted strategy including educational outreach visits, local opinion leaders, and quality circles. CONCLUSION: The suffering cancer patient is the main focus of this QoL diagnosis and therapy system. It will have to pass the rigorous test of a definitive randomized trial.

[Diagnosis and therapy of illness-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. Protocol of a randomized clinical trial at the Regensburg Tumour Centre]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der krankheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität bei Patientinnen mit Mammakarzi- nom. Protokoll einer randomisierten klinischen Studie am Tumorzentrum Regensburg.

BACKGROUND: The project conducted at the Tumour Centre in Regensburg aims to integrate quality of life (QL) diagnostics with the therapy of breast cancer patients and to evaluate the efficacy of QL diagnostics in the context of a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: The Regensburg Tumour Centre provides the infrastructure of the present project (telemedicine, project groups, quality circle). The treatment of breast cancer patients is based on the recent national breast cancer therapy guideline, including assorted QL-enhancing therapy options such as pain therapy, physiotherapy and lymphatic drainage, psychotherapy, social counselling and rehabilitation, nutrition and sports. During an implementation phase a new method of QL diagnostics has been developed. Five experts with varying professional background use the individual patient's QL profile and clinical and socio-demographic information in order to generate a QL report including a treatment recommendation. The study is designed as a two- arm randomized clinical trial with one test group (communication of the QL findings to the co-ordinating physician) and a control group (no communication). Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who are treated in the study region by one of the co-ordinating doctors will be included in this randomized study. At designated points in time QL assessments (EORTC QLQ-C30 plus BR23) will be conducted over a 12-months period. EXPECTED RESULTS: We expect that patients in the test group will experience a lower amount of QL deficits at the end of the study period (M = 1, SD = 2) than patients in the control group (M = 2, SD = 2). The statistical confirmation of this expected effect requires a total sample size of N = 200 (n = 100 vs. n = 100, alpha = 5% [two-tailed], beta = 10%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate a new form of QL diagnostics in the complexity of a real patient care environment, and it promises to make the inclusion of the quality of life concept into the current breast cancer treatment guideline more tangible.