Burst suppression during propofol anaesthesia recorded from scalp and subthalamic electrodes: report of three cases.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of slow EEG activity and burst suppression are the main tasks in monitoring the effects of anaesthestics with EEG, which is often done with commercial univariate indexes such as BIS. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of burst suppression EEG during propofol anaesthesia using scalp electrodes and depth electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus. Specifically, we describe the electrical fields of the three EEG patterns we have previously described: the sharp wave, the burst and the spindle. METHODS: We recorded the EEG of three Parkinson patients during propofol anaesthesia from the scalp electrodes and the depth electrode implanted in the subthalamic nucleus for treating parkinsonism. RESULTS: (1) The slow waves of bursts recorded from all surface electrodes on scalp or neck with depth electrode reference are positive and have the highest amplitude in frontal electrodes, suggesting synchronous generation in the whole cerebral cortex. (2) The sharp wave and spindles have the highest amplitude at vertex. They are opposite in polarity in vertex and depth electrodes when referred to the neck electrode, suggesting generation in the sensorimotor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Recording simultaneously EEG from the depth and scalp electrodes shows that bursts and their slow wave oscillations are synchronous in the whole cortex while spindles and sharp waves are produced by the sensorimotor cortex. The amplitude of slow waves recorded with surface electrodes is equal to the difference of the wave at two electrodes and therefore only a small part of that generated by the cortex.

Efficacy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has, for the most part, replaced irreversible stereotactic coagulations in the surgical treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. This study was undertaken to evaluate the benefits of bilateral STN stimulation related to its potential risks and side effects. METHOD: Twenty-nine consecutive Parkinsonian patients treated with STN-DBS were prospectively followed-up. Effects on Parkinsonian symptoms were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The evaluation was performed preoperatively and included postoperative follow-up evaluations at one and twelve months. All evaluations were made during the patient's best on-medication phase and postoperative follow-ups were conducted under both stimulator-on and stimulator-off conditions by a blinded neurologist. A neuropsychologist also evaluated the patients at every visit. FINDINGS: Two patients were excluded from the analysis because of severe surgical complications and three for an infection demanding the removal of the stimulator material. Other complications and side effects were clearly milder and temporary. At twelve months after surgery dyskinesia scores in the UPDRS were 53% lower than preoperative values. The results of the UPDRS motor scores improved 31.4% and activities of daily living (ADL) scores increased 19% compared with the preoperative situation. Also, the daily levodopa dose was 22% lower. Neuropsychological changes were minor, except for some deterioration in verbal fluency. CONCLUSION: The majority of Parkinsonian patients experienced significant and long lasting relief from their motor symptoms and an improvement in ADL functions due to DBS-STN therapy when evaluated at the best on-medication phase.