The effect of surgical factors on recurrence of tendon sheath giant cell tumours.

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of tumour-related and surgical factors on the recurrence of giant cell tumours of tendon sheath. A total of 95 patients were treated at our institution between February 2012 and March 2021. We identified the factors most likely to be associated with recurrence from evaluation of classification, neurovascular invasion, bone erosion and joint invasion. Based on these criteria, we identified 49 patients with a high risk of recurrence. Of the 95 patients, recurrence was observed in 17. Among the 49 patients classified as high-risk, 13 were found to have recurrence. This study demonstrates that recurrence is more common in the high-risk patient group.Level of evidence: IV.

Comparison of biomechanical analysis of four different tibial tunnel fixations in a bovine model.

BACKGROUND: To determine the ideal fixation technique for an ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft, multiple studies have been undertaken to define the initial biomechanical properties of tibial fixation. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of tibial fixation methods by creating single or hybrid systems. METHODS: Bovine tibias and forefoot digital extensor tendons were prepared with four different tibial anterior cruciate ligament fixation methods and compared biomechanically. Fixation materials included polyethylene Ultrabraid high-strength sutures, Biosure interference screws (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA), staples (Smith and Nephew, Richards Regular Fixation Staples without Spikes, Memphis, TN, USA), and knotless suture anchors (Multifix-S PEEK) (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). Four groups (n = 5 specimens) were established - group I: single fixation with interference screws; group II: single fixation with knotless anchors; group III: hybrid fixation with interference screws and staples; group IV: hybrid fixation with interference screws and knotless anchors. Each specimen underwent evaluations for cyclic displacement, cyclic stiffness, initial loading strength, ultimate failure load, pull-out displacement, and pull-out stiffness. RESULTS: All specimens completed cyclic loading and load-to-failure. The cyclic displacement in group II, which had a single fixation, indicated significantly greater elongation compared with the other groups (P = 0.002). The hybrid systems were more rigid than the single systems in terms of cyclic stiffness, and no statistically significant difference was observed between the hybrid systems (P = 0.461). Group IV was significantly superior in terms of the ultimate failure load (P = 0.004). No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups for pull-out displacement or pull-out stiffness. CONCLUSION: Single fixation with bioscrews as an in-tunnel tibia fixation method was as successful as hybrid systems. Multifix-S PEEK knotless suture anchors, which can be combined with bioscrews, can be a superior fixation alternative due to its flexibility and ultimate failure load values.

Fully threaded headless compression screw versus partially threaded cancellous lag screw in medial malleolus fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of medial malleolar fractures, which were treated with fully threaded headless compression screws and to compare the clinical and radiological results of this screws and partially threaded cancellous lag screws. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who attended the final follow-up examination were included in the study. Group 1 comprised 29 patients applied with fully threaded headless compression screws and Group 2 comprised 32 patients with partially threaded cancellous lag screws. Radiological evaluation was made with standard radiographs. The clinical evaluations were applied using the AOFAS ankle hindfoot scale. Pain or sensitivity by touching over the medial malleolus was recorded and scored according to Visual Analog Scale. RESULTS: No significant differences were determined between the groups with respect to age, gender, fracture type, follow-up time, bone union time and AOFAS scores. The medial sensitivity associated with implant irritation was significantly lower in Group 1. There was no need for removal of the fixation material in any patient of Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed satisfactory results in the two fixation techniques in medial malleolar fractures. However, the rates of medial sensitivity associated with implant irritation were lower in the group where fully threaded headless compression screws were used. Therefore, to prevent postoperative patient dissatisfaction caused by persistent medial sensitivity associated with implant irritation, despite successful surgical treatment, the primary choice may be fully threaded headless compression screws.