Validation of the Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) for Retrospective Studies and a Proposal for Modification.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of damage accrual over time is important for evaluating and comparing long-term results of treatment modalities and strategies. Retrospective studies may be useful for assessing long-term damage, especially in rare diseases. We aimed to validate Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) for use in retrospective studies by evaluating its construct validity, reliability, and feasibility in retrospectively collected data. Additionally, we aimed to determine missing items by evaluating Behçet's syndrome patients with different types of organ involvement and long-term follow-up. METHODS: We included 300 patients who had at least 2 clinic visits at 1-year intervals. The construct validity for use in retrospective trials was assessed by comparing BODI scores calculated from patient charts and during face-to-face visits. BODI was additionally scored using retrospective chart data by 2 different observers and by the same observer six months apart, in a blinded manner. The time for filling BODI was evaluated to assess feasibility. Additionally, damaged items that were missing from BODI were identified. RESULTS: There was a good correlation between the retrospective and face-to-face evaluation of BODI (ICC 0.99; %95 CI 0.99-0.99). Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were good (ICC 0.96 and 1, respectively). The main damage items that BODI did not capture were hypertension, liver failure, lung parenchymal involvement, glaucoma, and lymphedema. CONCLUSION: BODI seems to be a reliable and feasible instrument for assessing damage in retrospective studies. Modifying BODI using the additional damage items identified in this study may make it an even better scale.

Secukinumab induced Behçet's syndrome: a report of two cases.

Secukinumab is a human monoclonal antibody against IL-17A that has been shown to be effective in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). On the other hand, in randomized controlled trials among patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and uveitis due to Behçet's syndrome (BS) treated with secukinumab, primary end points were not met and the drug caused more exacerbations compared to placebo. The drug fact sheet states that secukinumab should be used with caution in patients with CD; however, there are no warnings for those with BS. Here, we present two patients with AS treated with secukinumab; we observed exacerbation of BS in one and emergence of de novo BS in another. Although IL-17A is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of BS, our observations suggest that it might have a protective role. Finally, we suggest caution is required with the inhibition of IL-17 in BS.

Biomarkers in vasculitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biomarkers are considered to be helpful in diagnosing, monitoring, predicting treatment response, and prognosis in clinical practice and as outcomes in clinical trials. In this article, we review the recent literature on new biomarkers and the expanding use of older ones in vasculitic conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: In antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis patients antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody type may be useful as a predictor of relapse and response to rituximab. Moreover, serial measurements of proteinase-3 titer may help to predict relapse. Urinary soluble CD163 levels are promising for identifying active renal vasculitis. Imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography, computerized angiography tomography, and temporal artery ultrasound maintain their role in diagnosis and disease assessment in large vessel vasculitis. Fecal calprotectin is a useful marker of active gastrointestinal involvement in Behçet's syndrome. SUMMARY: The publications reviewed here potentially may help to move the field of biomarkers in vasculitis management. However, more work toward understanding the underlying pathophysiology and effects of an intervention on the disease process are needed before true biomarkers can be realized. Further studies with appropriate control groups, using good definitions for disease states such as activity and remission are needed to guide our use of these markers correctly in the management of our patients.