RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) represents cardiometabolic dysregulation, defined by hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. There remains a significant gap in our understanding of whether MetS impacts outcomes of abdominal body contouring procedures. We aimed to assess the influence of MetS on postoperative outcomes of abdominal body contouring by concurrent abdominoplasty and panniculectomy. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was utilized to identify patients who underwent concurrent abdominoplasty and panniculectomy procedures from 2012 to 2022. Through propensity score matching, distinct cohorts were established based on the presence of MetS, characterized by patients receiving medical interventions for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index exceeding 30 kg/m2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 14,642 patients underwent abdominal body contouring from 2012 to 2022. Following propensity score matching, 730 patients were included in the analysis, with 365 in each group (MetS vs. non-MetS). Bivariate analysis revealed a longer hospital length of stay (2.3 vs. 1.6 days; p = 0.007) in the MetS cohort compared to the non-MetS cohort. Patients diagnosed with MetS had an average length of stay of 0.6 days longer than non-MetS patients (95% CI [0.17, 1.01]; p = 0.007). No noteworthy disparities were observed in the rates of 30-day wound complications, mild systemic, and severe systemic complications, and readmission rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that abdominal body contouring remains a secure option for patients with MetS. Nonetheless, the longer hospital length stays observed in patients with MetS may translate to increased overall costs to the healthcare system. Continued research is warranted to comprehensively assess the economic implications of MetS in the context of abdominal body contouring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
