RESUMO
The ground-based gravity data reveals diverse anomaly signatures in areas of the Main Ethiopian rift where active volcanic and tectonic activities are dominant. In such a region ground-based data collection is restricted to existing roads and relies on accessible stations. These resulted in gaps in data, either missing, uneven, or insufficient spatial coverage that must be estimated with proper interpolation techniques. Comparison and evaluations of the spatial interpolation methods that are commonly used in potential field geophysical data analysis were made for the terrestrial gravity and elevation data of the central Main Ethiopian rift. In this research, two widely used interpolation techniques, minimum curvature interpolation, and Ordinary Kriging were compared and assessed. A 10 % hold-out validation was employed, where 90 % of the data points were used to generate interpolated surfaces, which were then evaluated against the remaining 10 %. Following interpolation with each technique, the generated grid was converted into discrete data points (estimated values). These are then compared with the available gravity data, which were deliberately excluded from the gridding process (10 % remaining dataset). The accuracy of each method was assessed by evaluation metrics such as mean value, variance, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (r), and R-squared. The results showed that the ordinary Kriging interpolation method outperformed the minimum curvature interpolants for gravity data with all performance metrics, while both interpolants seem to perform equally well for the elevation dataset. Therefore, it is proposed to use the Kriging interpolation method for potential field gravity studies conducted in the central Main Ethiopia rift.
