Phase I study of liposomal annamycin.

Annamycin is a highly lipophilic anthracycline with the ability to bypass the MDR-1 mechanism of cellular drug resistance. In this phase I study, annamycin entrapped in liposomes was administered by a 1- to 2-h intravenous infusion at 3-week intervals. Thirty-six patients with relapsed solid tumors were treated and 109 courses were administered at doses ranging from 3 to 240 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a probable allergic reaction, requiring discontinuation of treatment in one. Treatment was well tolerated otherwise. No cardiac toxicity was seen on endomyocardial biopsy of four patients studied. There was limited gastrointestinal toxicity and no alopecia. No objective tumor responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic studies at 24, 120 and 240 mg/m2 showed a biexponential plasma concentration-versus-time profile. There was a linear relationship between the dose and the maximal plasma concentration with relatively constant plasma clearance values. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for liposomal annamycin defined in this study is 210 mg/m2. Because of a subsequent change in the formulation of the drug, future studies will use 190 mg/m2 as the MTD.

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel (100 mg/m2) was administered every 3 weeks to 46 patients registered at four centers. Patients had previously received < or = two chemotherapy regimens for MBC. All patients had progressive disease while receiving paclitaxel therapy. Treatment was repeated until there was evidence of disease progression or for a maximum of three cycles after best response. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in eight of 44 assessable patients (18.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7% to 29.5%). Seven patients had partial responses and one patient responded completely. Response rates were not significantly different by previously received paclitaxel dose or resistance. No responses were seen in 12 patients who had previously received paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion, but the response rate in 32 patients who had received paclitaxel by 1- to 3-hour infusion was 25%. The median response duration was 29 weeks and the median time to disease progression was 10 weeks. Median survival was 10.5 months. Clinically significant (severe) adverse events included neutropenic fever (24% of patients), asthenia (22%), infection (13%), stomatitis (9%), neurosensory changes (7%), myalgia (7%), and diarrhea (7%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is active in patients with paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer, particularly in those who failed to respond to brief infusions of paclitaxel. Response rates were comparable to or better than those seen with other therapies for patients with paclitaxel-resistant MBC. This confirms preclinical studies, which indicated only partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel.

Phase II study of ifosfamide and mesna in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the activity of ifosfamide in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer. From June 1991 through November 1992, 29 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with single-agent ifosfamide, 2 g/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days, with mesna support. All patients had previously received chemotherapy; all but one had previously received cyclophosphamide. The ifosfamide-mesna regimen was the first-line metastatic regimen in 15 patients, the second-line metastatic regimen in 13 patients, and the third-line metastatic regimen in one patient. Two partial remissions (7%) were observed; both occurred in the first-line metastatic group. The partial remissions were noted in patients who had completed adjuvant cyclophosphamide therapy 60 and 91 months earlier. Both responses were seen in lung metastases. The response durations were 5 and 8 months on continued therapy. The main adverse effects were granulocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis. At the dose used in this study, ifosfamide and mesna given without growth-factor support resulted in significant myelosuppression and produced only two partial remissions (7%) in 29 patients. Further study of ifosfamide as an isolated agent in previously treated patients is not warranted.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma receiving salvage chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and associated fever and infection are the most common complications of systemic chemotherapy. In this retrospective analysis, the authors evaluated the incidence of neutropenic fever, infection, and mortality in relation to the level of neutropenia, performance status, course number of chemotherapy, bone marrow metastasis, and age among patients with metastatic breast carcinoma receiving salvage chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 174 patients with previously treated metastatic breast carcinoma enrolled on 4 consecutive Phase II protocols were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of the patients had an episode of neutropenic fever (41 episodes among 40 patients). The incidence of neutropenic fever did not increase until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) had decreased to less than 500/microL, and then fever incidence had a linear relationship with decreasing ANC (linear trend, P < 0.01). A source of infection was documented in 59% of the neutropenic fever episodes. The incidence of infection did not increase significantly until the ANC had decreased to less than 250/microL (P < 0.01). The risk of neutropenic fever and infection was also significantly higher when patients had poor performance status or were undergoing the initial courses of chemotherapy. Patients with bone marrow metastases also had a higher frequency of fever, infection, and death, but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with metastatic breast carcinoma receiving salvage chemotherapy, the risk of fever increases with decreasing ANC, but the risk of infection does not increase significantly until ANC decreases to less than 250/microL. Poor performance status, initial courses of chemotherapy, and bone marrow metastases further increase the risk of fever, infection, and death.

A phase II study of CI-973 [SP-4-3(R)]-1,1-cyclobutane-dicarboxylato (2-)] (2-methyl-1,4-butanediamine-N, N') platinum in patients with refractory advanced breast cancer.

CI-973 is a water-soluble platinum diamine complex whose antitumor activity is greater than that of cisplatin in some murine tumors. It has shown activity against cisplatin-resistant tumors. This phase II trial had the objectives of determining the therapeutic efficacy of CI-973 in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been treated with one prior chemotherapy regimen, and of further defining the toxicity of the agent and the reversibility of its toxicity. CI-973 was administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 min with no prehydration or antiemetic programs. Treatment cycles were repeated at 21-day intervals. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer, measurable disease, and good performance status who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease were eligible for treatment. Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function were required. A total of 26 patients received a median of two courses of CI-973 (range, 1-18 courses). Hematologic toxicity was severe: nearly all patients experienced granulocytopenia with granulocyte counts of 0 at all dose levels. Nevertheless, neutropenic fever and documented systemic infection were uncommon, and there were no hospitalizations for neutropenic fever or infection. Visceral disease dominated in this patient group. Of the 26 patients, 14 had visceral disease, 6 had bone or bone marrow disease, and 6 had skin, soft-tissue, or lymph-node disease. Of the 26 patients treated, 25 were evaluable for response. There were two partial remissions, one in liver and one in bone, and three minor responses, for a response rate of 8%. Nonhematologic toxic effects were mild and consisted of nausea and vomiting, fatigue, minimum peripheral paresthesia, and hypomagnesemia. Further study of CI-973 at the dose and schedule used in this study is not warranted. Because this agent had no significant extramedullary toxicity, intensification of the dose of CI-973 with concomitant administration of colony-stimulating factors has the potential to improve response in this patient population.