Dietary and/or physical activity interventions in women with overweight or obesity prior to fertility treatment: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Dietary and/or physical activity interventions are often recommended for women with overweight or obesity as the first step prior to fertility treatment. However, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) so far have shown inconsistent results. Therefore, we propose this individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dietary and/or physical activity interventions in women with infertility and overweight or obesity on reproductive, maternal and perinatal outcomes and to explore if there are subgroup(s) of women who benefit from each specific intervention or their combination (treatment-covariate interactions). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include RCTs with dietary and/or physical activity interventions as core interventions prior to fertility treatment in women with infertility and overweight or obesity. The primary outcome will be live birth. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and trial registries to identify eligible studies. We will approach authors of eligible trials to contribute individual participant data (IPD). We will perform risk of bias assessments according to the Risk of Bias 2 tool and a random-effects IPDMA. We will then explore treatment-covariate interactions for important participant-level characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval for the project (Venus-IPD) was exempted by the medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc code: 2021/563, date: 17 November 2021). Data transfer agreement will be obtained from each participating institute/hospital. Outcomes will be disseminated internationally through the collaborative group, conference presentations and peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021266201.

Impact of chronic endometritis in infertility: a SWOT analysis.

Chronic endometritis is a pathology often associated with reproductive failure, but there are still no clear recommendations on whether its inclusion in the initial study of infertile couples is necessary. In this discussion paper, based on a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis, the different aspects of the repercussions of chronic endometritis in fertility are evaluated. To avoid possible subjectivity in the analysis and results of this study, the researchers followed the Oxford criteria for the evaluation of evidence. The results from the evaluation of the reviewed literature seem to indicate that, pending new evidence, it would be advisable not to include chronic endometritis in the initial baseline study before assisted reproduction in order not to delay other assisted reproduction treatments. However, it would be advisable in cases of repetitive implantation failure and pregnancy loss after having undergone IVF with viable embryos and before continuing with costly reproductive processes, since results could be improved. The development of randomized studies assessing the impact of antibiotic treatment as a possible therapeutic option in infertile women with chronic endometritis, as well as the possible impact on endometrial microbiota and receptivity/implantation, would allow for the establishment of more precise clinical guidelines in this regard.

The Effect of Lifestyle Intervention on Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes on Obese Infertile Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Obesity has been associated with negative effects on natural fertility and poor prognosis when assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are performed. Patients attending for fertility treatments are often advised to optimize their weights to improve the outcomes. There is lack of enough information on how weight-loss would be effective for improving fertility in women who are overweight or obese. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether weight-loss achieved by lifestyle program improves natural or assisted reproduction in obese infertile women. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to March 2018. Two reviews were selected as randomised trials assessing a lifestyle intervention in women with obesity before receiving treatments for infertility and appraised their risk of bias. We extracted data on pregnancy, birth, and miscarriage rates as the primary outcomes and pooled effect estimates using a random effects model. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. We reported summary measures as the relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and percentage of heterogeneity (I2). We included eight randomised trials with 1175 women. Lifestyle programmes, improved pregnancy rates (RR: 1.43, CI: 95% 1.02 to 2.01; I2=60%; 8 RCTs; N=1098) but had no impact on live births (RR: 1.39, CI: 95% 0.90 to 2.14; I2=64%; 7RCTs; N=1034). Our findings suggest that women participating in lifestyle interventions had an increased risk of miscarriage (RR: 1.50, CI: 95% 1.04 to 2.16; I2=0; 6RCTs; N=543). We rated the quality of evidence for these outcomes as the moderate-to-low. Lifestyle interventions slightly increased the pregnancy rate, while it would be uncertain whether it can improve the live birth. Lifestyle interventions can increase the risk of miscarriage. More research is needed to further explore lifestyle interventions on reproductive outcomes in obese infertile women.

Weight decrease improves live birth rates in obese women undergoing IVF: a pilot study.

Obese women have lower pregnancy rates than normal-weight women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate whether a 12-week diet and exercise intervention before an IVF cycle would influence pregnancy rates in obese women. Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. They were randomly allocated to two groups: an intervention group (n = 21), who underwent an individualized diet and physical exercise programme supervised by a dietician, and a control group (n = 20), who started IVF with no previous intervention. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate after a single treatment cycle. Mean weight loss in the study group after the intervention was 5.4 kg (range 1.1-14.6 kg). The study and control groups had similar total FSH consumption, number of oocytes and embryos obtained, and number and quality of embryos transferred. There was a non-significant trend towards a higher clinical pregnancy rate after fresh embryo transfer (66.7% versus 41.2%). The intervention group had a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate (61.9% versus 30%, P = 0.045) (odds ratio for intervention group, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 13.9) The data suggest that weight loss resulted in a significantly increased cumulative live birth rate.

Pituitary response profile following metoclopramide administration in women with different forms of hyperprolactinemia.

AIMS: To test the hypothesis that macroprolactinemia is an extra-pituitary phenomenon by showing that the pituitary production of prolactin in patients with hyperprolactinemia due to macroprolactin is comparable to that in normoprolactinemic women and different from that in women with monomeric hyperprolactinemia. METHODS: Twenty-five women were studied: eight with macroprolactin hyperprolactinemia, eight with monomeric hyperprolactinemia, and nine controls. Prolactin levels were measured before and after precipitation with polyethylene glycol at baseline and at 5, 10,15, 30, and 60 min after metoclopramide administration (10 mg i.v.) in the three groups. RESULTS: The response profile of total and monomeric prolactin following the administration of metoclopramide was similar in women with monomeric hyperprolactinemia and normoprolactinemia but different in women with macroprolactinemia. The areas under the curve for total and monomeric prolactin were higher in patients with macroprolactinemia than in the other two groups (p < 0·0001). The maximal concentration of monomeric prolactin was reached before that of total prolactin in macroprolactinemic patients but the differences were not significant. DISCUSSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that prolactin secretion is comparable in women with macroprolactinemia and in normoprolactinemic women. The dynamics of the secretion suggest that the formation of prolactin complexes is an extra-pituitary process.

Hirsutism scoring in polycystic ovary syndrome: concordance between clinicians' and patients' self-scoring.

In a clinical series of 68 women with polycystic ovary syndrome in which the reason for consultation was hirsutism, the mean (standard error of the mean) hirsutism score of the modified Ferriman-Gallwey method was 15.1 (6.8), compared with 12.0 (4.4) for clinicians' scoring. In the multivariable analysis, clinicians' scoring of hirsutism was the only independent variable significantly associated with increased testosterone free index levels.

Use of letrozole in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Letrozole is the third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) most widely used in assisted reproduction. AIs induce ovulation by inhibiting estrogen production; the consequent hypoestrogenic state increases GnRH release and pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) synthesis. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed for both prospective and retrospective studies. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were performed for three comparisons: letrozole versus clomiphene citrate (CC), letrozole + FSH versus FSH in intrauterine insemination (IUI) and letrozole + FSH versus FSH in IVF. In the absence of RCTs, non-randomized studies were pooled. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Four RCTs compared the overall effect of letrozole with CC in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. The pooled result was not significant for ovulatory cycles (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.66-2.09), or for pregnancy rate per cycle (OR = 1.47; 95% CI 0.73-2.96) or for pregnancy rate per patient (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.70-2.71). In three retrospective studies which compared L + FSH with FSH in ovarian stimulation for IUI, the pooled OR was 1.15 (95% CI 0.78-1.71). A final meta-analysis included one RCT and one cohort study that compared letrozole + gonadotrophin versus gonadotrophin alone: the pooled pregnancy rate per patient was not significantly different (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 0.67-2.91). CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole is as effective as other methods of ovulation induction. Further randomized-controlled studies are warranted to define more clearly the efficacy and safety of letrozole in human reproduction.