The influence of cognitive factors in relation to the patients' treatment adherence for non-specific chronic low-back pain. A case series.

INTRODUCTION: The positive effects of exercise programs in relation to chronic low-back pain have been long established and patient adherence has a fundamental role in the impact of the resulting benefits. On the other hand, cognitive factors have shown to be the predictors of poor outcomes in patient suffering from this condition to the point of possibly affecting adherence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of cognitive factors on the adherence to a home exercise program, the patient's pain intensity and their level of disability at a two-month follow-up, specifically regarding patients with non-specific chronic low-back pain (NSCLBP). METHOD: ology: Ten patients with NSLBP underwent a home exercise program. This study was undertaken to assess their adherence rate after two months. The assessment tools included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index pre-follow-up and post-follow-up (ODI1 and ODI2), the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK-11), the Pain Catastrophism Scale (PCS), the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSS) respectively. RESULTS: There were no significant associations found between adherence and the selected cognitive factors. There was an association between GSS and VAS (R = 0.68, p = 0.031). A clinically relevant improvement of 6.8 points in the mean of ODI2 in relation to ODI1 was observed. CONCLUSION: The influence of cognitive factors on adherence has not been ruled out because the study had a low sample size. Future studies should replicate the evaluation protocol in a larger population.

"I don't want to be a burden" A qualitative study of the beliefs of women with chronic low back pain in relation to their painful experience.

BACKGROUND: Women's pain is still poorly understood. Moreover, maladaptive pain beliefs contribute to the disability associated with low back pain and play a key role in the transition from acute to chronic symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To explore the beliefs of women with non-specific chronic low back pain in terms of nature of symptoms, fears associated with pain, expectations for recovery, family, social and work-related limitations, and perceived self-efficacy. DESIGN AND METHODS: A qualitative study with an interpretative approach was undertaken. Face-to-face, semi-structured individual interviews were performed. Study participants were 10 women with non-specific chronic low back pain living in the Metropolitan Region of Chile. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. A deductive process was used to code the text and categorize the data. RESULTS: Participants described maladaptive beliefs about pain, leading to fearful attitudes and low expectations for recovery. These beliefs seemed to perpetuate pain and limit engagement in daily tasks and meaningful activities. Some of these beliefs were associated with information provided by healthcare professions. Despite having maladaptive beliefs, women perceived themselves as self-effective. CONCLUSION: Women with chronic low back pain described a range of different pain beliefs across a complex categorial structure. The contents of such structure may interfere with their decisions about therapeutic options. Their beliefs were often ungrounded in scientific principles, even if the information may have been provided by healthcare providers. Physical therapists would benefit from these findings to improve communication with their patients and assess the role of beliefs in decision-making.

A single preoperative pain neuroscience education: Is it an effective strategy for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome?

Patients undergoing carpal tunnel release surgery may continue to experience pain despite the intervention. This symptom may be modulated by psychosocial factors including depression, catastrophic thinking, and kinesiophobia. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been found to be effective when combined with therapeutic exercise in patients with chronic pain, but this strategy has not been evaluated in patients with persistent hand pain. The findings of this study indicate that a single preoperative PNE session in combination with therapeutic exercise does not provide added benefits in comparison to standard preoperative care plus therapeutic exercise. Future studies should evaluate if patients with carpal tunnel release are additionally benefited by the incorporation and consequent behavioural changes of more PNE sessions to multimodal treatment.