Application and validation of a surgical risk calculator in a liver surgery cohort of patients in Veracruz, Mexico.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple models have tried to predict the morbidity and mortality of liver resections (HR). This study aims to determine the efficacy and validity of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator in a cohort of patients undergoing HR in Veracruz, Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing HR between 2005 and 2019. To estimate the performance of the calculator, the observed results were compared with the average risk predicted by the calculator, using ROC curve, Brier score and Z test. RESULTS: 67 patients were evaluated, mean age 51.9 years of age, 50.7% female. The majority of resections (56.7%) were for malignancy and 62.1% were partial hepatectomies (up to 3 liver segments). The morbidity was 25.4% and the mortality 4.5%. There was a good prediction in the complications (serious complication: C = 0.725 statistic, Brier score 0.26, p = 0.006 and any statistical complication C = 0.731, Brier score 0.33, p = 0.005) and mortality (C = 0.922 statistic, Brier score 0.005, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the ACS-NSQIP calculator in patients undergoing HR has good discrimination power and good predictive ability. Prediction of postoperative risks achieves a preoperative planning of the appropriate procedure.

OBJETIVO: Múltiples modelos han intentado predecir la morbilidad y mortalidad de las resecciones hepáticas (RH). Este estudio tiene por objetivo determinar la eficacia y validez de la calculadora de riesgo quirúrgico del American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) en una cohorte de pacientes sometidos a RH en Veracruz, México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a RH entre 2005 y 2019. Se compararon los resultados observados con la media del riesgo previsto por la calculadora, mediante Curva ROC, score de Brier y prueba Z. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 67 pacientes, con 51.9 años de edad media, un 50.7% de sexo femenino. La mayoría de las resecciones (56.7%) fueron por patología maligna y el 62.1% fueron hepatectomías parciales. La morbilidad fue del 25.4% y la mortalidad del 4.5%. Hubo una predicción buena en las complicaciones (complicación seria, estadística: C: 0.725, score Brier: 0.26, p = 0.006 y cualquier complicación, estadística: C: 0.731, score Brier: 0.33, p = 0.005) y la mortalidad (estadística C: 0.922, score Brier: 0.005, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONES: La aplicación de la calculadora ACS-NSQIP en pacientes sometidos a RH tiene buen poder de discriminación y buena habilidad predictiva. Predecir riesgos postoperatorios logra una adecuada planeación preoperatoria del procedimiento.

Differences in Post-Cholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury Care: A Comparative Analysis of 2 Different Health-Care Public Institutions in a Low- and Middle-Income Country: Southeast Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Mexican health system structure allows us to study the differences in bile duct injury (BDI) management. The study aimed to assess the differences in patients with complex BDI in 2 different public sector institutions using a new proposed standard terminology. METHODS: Retrospective review (2008-2019) in 2 public institutions (IMSS/SESVER). Bismuth-Strasberg E injuries with hepaticojejunostomy were included. Data are presented in a tabular reporting system. The outcomes were percent of patients attaining primary patency, loss of primary patency, and actuarial primary patency rate. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (IMSS: n = 37; SESVER: n = 41) without differences in demographic and preoperative assessment were studied. BDI occurred mostly in outside hospitals. Open cholecystectomy was the most common index operation in SESVER (73%, p = 0.02). IMSS had more surgeries (p = 0.007) and repair attempts (p = 0.06) prior to referral. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was more commonly used in IMSS patients. Biliary stents (45%) and cholangitis (29%) were more common in IMSS (p < 0.05). IMSS patients had longer follow-up than SESVER (p < 0.05). No differences in primary patency rates (IMSS: 89%, SESVER: 97%) and actuarial patency rates were noted. DISCUSSION: Despite differences in referral, preoperative, and operative events, good BDI repair outcomes can be achieved. Longer follow-up is needed to monitor these outcomes.

[Hepatocellular carcinoma originated in the caudate lobe. Surgical strategy for resection. A propos of a case]. / Hepatocarcinoma originado en el lóbulo caudado. Estrategia quirúrgica para su resección. A propósito de un caso.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma originating from the caudate lobe has a worse prognosis than other hepatocellular carcinoma in another segment of the liver. An isolated caudate lobe resection of the liver represents a significant technical challenge. Caudate lobe resection can be performed along with a lobectomy or as an isolated liver resection. There are very few reports about isolated caudate lobe liver resection. We report a case of successful isolated resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in the caudate lobe with excellent long-term survival. CLINICAL CASE: A 74 years old female with 8cm mass lesion in the caudate lobe without clinical or biochemical evidence of liver cirrhosis, serum alpha-fetoprotein 3.7 U/l, and negative hepatitis serology was evaluated for surgery. Complete resection of the lesion in 270minutes with Pringle maneuver for 13minutes was satisfactorily performed. Patient was discharged ten days after surgery without complications. Patient is currently asymptomatic, without deterioration of liver function and 48 month tumor free survival after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Isolated caudate lobe resection is an uncommon but technically possible procedure. In order to achieve a successful resection, one must have a detailed knowledge of complete liver anatomy. Tumor free margins must be obtained to provide long survival for these patients who have a malignancy in this anatomic location.