"I Felt Like I Was a Puppet-He's the Master, and He's Playing With My Life": Newcomer Women's Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence.

This study adds to a small body of Canadian literature investigating the ways that newcomer women experience, and are impacted by, intimate partner violence (IPV). The study involved qualitative interviews with 15 newcomer women who migrated to Saskatchewan, Canada, from 12 different countries. These findings provide insight into participants' complex lived experiences and illustrate how women's status as newcomers intersected with their experiences of IPV. As well as abuse related to language ability and immigration status, participants in our study described their experiences of physical; sexual; emotional; psychological; economic; and legal abuse; as well as coercive control; isolation; surveillance, stalking, and harassment while in the relationship and after separation; challenges with shared parenting; and the imposition of patriarchal values. Perpetrators of IPV maintained control by intentionally isolating survivors, and participants were also isolated due to their status as a newcomer and their limited English-language ability and social connections.

Professional, personal and community: 3 domains of physician retention in rural communities.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to explore the professional, personal and community domains of physician retention in 4 rural communities in Alberta and to develop a preliminary framework for physician retention. METHODS: We used a qualitative, collective case study design to study 4 rural communities (cases) in Alberta that retained family physicians for 4 years or longer. Participants included physicians, staff members, spouses and community members. Data collected from interviews, documents and observations were analyzed individually, and similarities and differences across all cases were assessed. RESULTS: A range of factors that could influence physicians' decisions to stay in a particular community were described by participants. Within the professional domain, physician supply, physician dynamics, scope of practice and practice set-up were common across all communities, and innovation, and management and support emerged from some communities. The personal factors, goodness-of-fit, individual choice, and spousal and family support were present in all communities. Four community factors--appreciation, connection, active support, and physical and recreational assets--emerged across all communities, and reciprocity was present in 3 communities. From these data, we developed a preliminary retention framework. CONCLUSION: Physicians, policy-makers and community members are encouraged to consider the 3 retention domains of professional, personal and community.

Physician retention in rural Alberta: key community factors.

OBJECTIVES: As part of a larger case study exploring physician retention factors and strategies employed by rural communities, the objective of this analysis was to explore the community factors that promoted physician retention. METHODS: A qualitative, collective case study design was employed to study four rural communities (cases) in Alberta that retained family physicians for four years or longer. Participants included physicians, staff members, spouses and community members (all were patients from the communities studied). Communities were selected through a retention-specific matrix; each quadrant represented a particular community typology. Case data collected from interviews, documents and observations were analyzed, and similarities and differences among cases were assessed. RESULTS: A range of community factors that could influence physicians' decisions to stay in a particular community were described by participants. Four themes, Appreciation, Connection, Active Support and Physical/Recreational Assets, were positively related to physician retention in the four communities studied. These community factors existed to different degrees but were present in all communities. Reciprocity was a fifth factor that emerged in three of the four communities studied. CONCLUSION: Physicians, policy-makers, community members and health care professionals are encouraged to consider the community domain when planning and implementing strategies to retain rural physicians and other health care professionals. The four communities studied were able to promote retention of their primary care physicians by showing appreciation to them, building connections with them and their families, actively supporting their physicians and local health facilities, maintaining and improving local physical/recreational amenities, and nurturing reciprocal rapport with physicians.