RESUMO
Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad diagnóstica y pronóstica de la cardiorresonancia magnética de estrés (RMCE) en pacientes con distinto perfil de riesgo cardiovascular y la importancia del grado de hipoperfusión en la toma de decisiones clínicas. Método: Se analizaron los pacientes sometidos a RMCE con adenosina por sospecha de isquemia miocárdica. Se evaluó su precisión diagnóstica mediante los cocientes de probabilidad (CP) y su valor pronóstico mediante curvas de supervivencia y regresión de Cox. Resultados: Se estudió a 295 pacientes. El CP positivo fue 3.40 y el negativo 0.47. Se demostró una mayor utilidad de la resonancia en: pacientes sin cardiopatía isquémica conocida (CP positivo 4.85); pacientes con dolor torácico atípico (CP positivo 8.56);pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular bajo o intermedio (CP positivo 3.87), y pacientes con hipoperfusión moderada o grave (CP positivo 8.63). Se registraron 60 eventos cardiovasculares mayores. Los pacientes con resultado negativo (p = 0.001) o hipoperfusión leve (p = 0.038) presentaron una supervivencia mayor. En el análisis multivariante, un resultado moderado o grave aumentó la probabilidad de sufrir eventos (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2; IC 95% 1.26-3.92), sin diferencias entre resultado positivo leve y negativo (HR = 0.93; IC 95% 0.38-2.28). Conclusiones: La RMCE tuvo una mayor utilidad en pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular bajo o intermedio, con dolor torácico atípico, sin cardiopatía isquémica conocida y en aquellos con hipoperfusión moderada o grave. Además, el grado de hipoperfusión fue el principal factor para guiar las decisiones clínicas.
Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (stress CMR) in patients with different cardiovascular risk profile and to assess if the degree of hypoperfusion is important to guide clinical decisions. Method: We included patients submitted to adenosine stress CMR to rule out myocardial ischemia. We evaluated its diagnostic accuracy with likelihood ratio (LR) and its prognostic value with survival curves and a Cox regression model. Results: 295 patients were studied. The positive LR was 3.40 and the negative one 0.47. The maximal usefulness of the test was found in patients without previous ischemic cardiomyopathy (positive LR 4.85), patients with atypical chest pain (positive LR 8.56), patients with low or intermediate cardiovascular risk (positive LR 3.87) and those with moderate or severe hypoperfusion (positive LR 8.63). Sixty cardiovascular major events were registered. The best survival prognosis was found in patients with a negative result (p = 0.001) or mild hypoperfusion (p = 0.038). In the multivariate analysis, a moderate or severe hypoperfusion increased cardiovascular event probability (HR = 2.2; IC 95% 1.26-3.92), with no differences between a mild positive and a negative result (HR = 0.93; IC 95% 0.38-2.28). Conclusions: Stress CMR was specially useful in patients with low or intermediate cardiovascular risk, patients with atypical chest pain, patients without previous ischemic cardiomyopathy and those with moderate or severe hypoperfusion. Hypoperfusion degree was the main issue factor to guide clinical decisions.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamento farmacológico , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Prognóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Técnicas de Imagem de Sincronização CardíacaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (stress CMR) in patients with different cardiovascular risk profile and to assess if the degree of hypoperfusion is important to guide clinical decisions. METHOD: We included patients submitted to adenosine stress CMR to rule out myocardial ischemia. We evaluated its diagnostic accuracy with likelihood ratio (LR) and its prognostic value with survival curves and a Cox regression model. RESULTS: 295 patients were studied. The positive LR was 3.40 and the negative one 0.47. The maximal usefulness of the test was found in patients without previous ischemic cardiomyopathy (positive LR 4.85), patients with atypical chest pain (positive LR 8.56), patients with low or intermediate cardiovascular risk (positive LR 3.87) and those with moderate or severe hypoperfusion (positive LR 8.63). Sixty cardiovascular major events were registered. The best survival prognosis was found in patients with a negative result (p=0.001) or mild hypoperfusion (p=0.038). In the multivariate analysis, a moderate or severe hypoperfusion increased cardiovascular event probability (HR=2.2; IC 95% 1.26-3.92), with no differences between a mild positive and a negative result (HR=0.93; IC 95% 0.38-2.28). CONCLUSIONS: Stress CMR was specially useful in patients with low or intermediate cardiovascular risk, patients with atypical chest pain, patients without previous ischemic cardiomyopathy and those with moderate or severe hypoperfusion. Hypoperfusion degree was the main issue factor to guide clinical decisions.