Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy is a standard part of limb conserving therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk of recurrence. Toxic effects increase with radiation dose and volume of normal tissue irradiated. This study sought to compare dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to investigate the optimal planning technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with extremity STS who underwent preoperative radiation therapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) between 2016 and 2020 at a specialised sarcoma center were included. The original treatment techniques were sliding window IMRT or 3-dimensional conformal. VMAT plans were retrospectively generated according to the original tumor and organ-at-risk constraints. Quality assurance was performed as per departmental protocol. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dosimetric parameters (for planning target volume [PTV], in-field bone, and soft tissue structures), monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. RESULTS: Median patient age was 65 years and the majority were male (n = 14, 70%). The most common subtype was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 14, 70%), and most tumors were located on the thigh (n = 12, 60%). Median PTV was 1110 cm3 and median volume of in-field bone 236 cm3. VMAT plans had significantly lower average MU (480 vs 862 MU, P < .001) and overall treatment time (300 vs 153 seconds, P < .001). PTV coverage favored VMAT, with marginally higher mean, minimum, and maximum doses and higher conformity index. However, differences were not statistically significant. Dose to infield bone and soft tissue structures were similar or slightly lower with VMAT. CONCLUSIONS: In extremity STS, VMAT plans demonstrated a favorable trend toward tumor coverage and dose conformity compared with IMRT along with significantly lower MUs and half the overall treatment time.

In-vivo dosimetry comparison of supraclavicular junction dose for breast and chest-wall patients with and without deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH).

PURPOSE: The use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for patients with left-sided breast cancer reduces cardiac dose, with the aim of reducing the risk of major coronary events. However, this technique has not been universally adopted for patients requiring regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with one concern related to the junction dose. This study evaluates the dose received at the junction for both DIBH and free-breathing patients having tangential breast/chest wall radiation and regional nodal radiation treated with 3D-conformal or hybrid IMRT radiotherapy. METHODS: In-vivo dosimetry measurements utilizing EBT3 GafChromic™ film were performed for 19 patients during three fractions over their course of treatment. The mean junction dose and variability in junction dose were compared between the DIBH and free breathing patients. RESULTS: Our results show that for voluntary DIBH (v-DIBH) patients the junction dose is more variable between fractions. However, when comparing the average junction dose for DIBH and free breathing patients over the three measurements, the difference was small and not statistically significant. A larger difference was seen when patient measurements were analysed based on treatment linac. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the mean junction dose is not significantly compromised by the use of v-DIBH. The small possibility of a change in junction dose due to breathing technique should be weighed against the proven increased risks associated with excess cardiac dose received by free-breathing patients. If junction dose is of concern, an in-vivo study, such as this one, could allow cautious introduction of DIBH for patients requiring supraclavicular irradiation.

Assessment of voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold with CINE imaging for breast radiotherapy.

Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (DIBH) techniques for breast cancer radiation therapy (RT) have reduced cardiac dose compared to Free Breathing (FB). Recently, a voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (vDIBH) technique was established using in-room lasers and skin tattoos to monitor breath-hold. An in-house quality assessment of positional reproducibility during RT delivery with vDIBH in patients with left-sided breast cancer was evaluated. The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was used in cinematographic (CINE) mode to capture a sequence of images during beam delivery. Weekly CINE images were retrospectively assessed for 20 left-sided breast cancer patients receiving RT in vDIBH, and compared with CINE images of 20 patients treated in FB. The intra-beam motion was assessed and the distance from the beam central axis (CA) to the internal chest wall (ICW) was measured on each CINE image. These were then compared to the planned distance on digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). The maximum intra-beam motion for any one patient measurement was 0.30 cm for vDIBH and 0.20 cm for FB. The mean difference between the distance from the CA to ICW on DRR and the equivalent distance on CINE imaging (as treated) was 0.28 cm (SD 0.17) for vDIBH patients and 0.25 cm (SD 0.14) for FB patients (P = 0.458). The measured values were comparable for patients undergoing RT in vDIBH, and for those in FB. This quality assessment showed that using in-room lasers and skin tattoos to independently monitor breath-hold in vDIBH as detected by 'on-treatment' CINE imaging is safe and effective.