Drug-eluting, balloon-expandable, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds reduce neointimal thickness and stenosis in an animal model of percutaneous peripheral intervention.

Objective: Recanalization with balloon angioplasty and/or self-expanding stents (SES) has become the endovascular treatment of choice for symptomatic femoropopliteal occlusive disease. These strategies generate suboptimal clinical results, however, because they fail to expand the artery fully and ineffectively prevent recoil, neointimal hyperplasia, and restenosis. Balloon-expandable stents, given their greater radial force and rigid structure, represent a more effective treatment strategy, but only short lengths can be implanted safely in arteries that deform and bend with skeletal motion. The purpose of this preclinical experiment was to test the hypothesis that simultaneous implantation of a series of short, resorbable, balloon-expandable, paclitaxel-eluting scaffolds would prevent neointimal hyperplasia and stenosis compared with SES in an animal model of percutaneous femoropopliteal intervention. Methods: We extruded 6 × 60 mm Efemoral Vascular Scaffold Systems (EVSS) from copolymers of poly-L-lactic acid, coated with paclitaxel 3 µg/mm2, crimped onto a single delivery balloon, and implanted percutaneously into the iliofemoral arteries of eight Yucatan mini-swine. We implanted 7- to 8-mm × 60 mm SES into the contralateral experimental arteries. The animals were serially imaged with contrast angiography and optical coherence tomography after 30, 90, 180, 365, and 730 days. The primary end point of this study was neointimal morphometry over time. Secondary end points included acute deformation and angiographic and optical coherence tomography-derived measurements of chronic vascular response. Results: Over the 2-year study period, one SES was found to be completely occluded at 90 days; all EVSS were widely patent at all time points. Arteries treated with SES exhibited profound neointimal hyperplasia with in-stent stenosis. In contrast, arteries treated with EVSS exhibited only modest vascular responses and minimal stenosis. After 2 years, the mean neointimal thickness (0.45 ± 0.12 vs 1.31 ± 0.91 mm; P < .05) and area (8.41 ± 3.35 vs 21.86 ± 7.37 mm2; P < .05) were significantly decreased after EVSS implantation. By 2 years, all scaffolds in all EVSS-treated arteries had resorbed fully. Conclusions: In this preclinical animal model of peripheral endovascular intervention, the EVSS decreased neointimal hyperplasia and stenosis significantly compared with SES, then dissolved completely between the first and second years after implantation.

Intravascular treatment of long segments of experimental peripheral arteries with multiple, serial, balloon-expandable, resorbable scaffolds.

Symptomatic femoropopliteal occlusive disease has been increasingly treated using endovascular methods. However, restenosis, especially after implantation of permanent metallic stents, has remained common. To date, resorbable scaffolds have failed to achieve sufficient radial strength to enable the successful treatment of long, mobile, peripheral arteries. In the present nonsurvival, large animal experiment, a novel device consisting of multiple, short, serial, balloon-expandable, bioresorbable scaffolds was deployed in arteries subjected to supraphysiologic deformation. Compared with native vessels, the scaffolded arteries continued to bend (113° ± 19° vs 110° ± 20°; P = .10) and shorten (15% ± 15% vs 20% ± 14%; P = .16), unencumbered by the placement of the investigational device. The mean luminal diameter of the scaffolded arteries was preserved without kinks or occlusions in exaggerated flexion (4.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.7 ± 0.5 mm in extension vs flexion; P = .80). Arterial deformation was borne by shortening of the interscaffold spaces (2.2 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.9 ± 0.7 mm in extension vs flexion; P < .01) and the scaffolds themselves (10.7 ± 1.4 mm vs 9.9 ± 1.1 mm in extension vs flexion; P < .01). The results from the present study challenge the perceived limitations of balloon-expandable devices implanted in peripheral mobile arteries. We have presented a bioresorbable scaffold that combines sufficient radial strength to preserve the mean luminal diameter with movement and the flexibility to accommodate femoropopliteal deformation.

Novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable coronary scaffold upsized up to 0.8 mm beyond nominal diameter: An OCT and histopathology study in porcine coronary artery model.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties and healing pattern of novel sirolimus-eluting, ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous poly-L-lactic acid bioresorbable scaffolds (S-BRS) that have been postdilated by 0.55 and 0.8 mm beyond the nominal diameters within the pressure-diameter compliance chart range. BACKGROUND: Due to the inherent limitations of bioabsorbable polymeric materials, overexpansion/upsizing may be very limited for some BRS such as the benchmark Absorb BVS. The unique biomechanical properties of the novel S-BRS may allow it to be safely upsized. METHODS AND RESULTS: 12 coronary arteries of 4 healthy Yucatan mini-swine underwent implantation of a novel S-BRS. Upsizing by postdilation was performed up to 0.55mm (PLUS 0.55, n = 6) or 0.8 mm (PLUS 0.8, n = 6) in a manner maintaining consistent 1:1.1 stent-to-artery, thus ensuring not only the overexpansion of the scaffold but consistent level of arterial injury. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up was performed at 28 and 90-days follow-up. There was no statistical difference between the tested groups in terms of acute recoil. OCT analysis after 28 days showed numerically lower levels of neointimal formation in PLUS 0.8 compared to PLUS 0.55 group. These results were sustained at 90-days follow-up. There was no difference in late recoil between studied groups. No scaffold discontinuation, deformation or overlapping of the struts were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Overexpansion up to 0.8 mm of novel, high strength S-BRS is not associated with worse angiographic outcomes, neointimal formation or biomechanical issues such as scaffold discontinuation, deformation or overlapping of the struts, neither acutely nor chronically. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparative Biomechanical Behavior and Healing Profile of a Novel Thinned Wall Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Amorphous Poly-l-Lactic Acid Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical strength of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) is highly dependent on strut dimensions and polymer features. To date, the successful development of thin-walled BRS has been challenging. We compared the biomechanical behavior and vascular healing profile of a novel thin-walled (115 µm) sirolimus-eluting ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous poly-l-lactic acid-based BRS (APTITUDE, Amaranth Medical [AMA]) to Absorb (bioresorbable vascular scaffold [BVS]) using different experimental models. METHODS AND RESULTS: In vitro biomechanical testing showed no fractures in the AMA-BRS when overexpanded 1.3 mm above nominal dilatation values (≈48%) and lower number of fractures on accelerated cycle testing over time (at 21 K cycles=20.0 [19.5-20.5] in BVS versus 4.0 [3.0-4.3] in AMA-BRS). In the healing response study, 35 AMA-BRS and 23 BVS were implanted in 58 coronary arteries of 23 swine and followed-up to 180 days. Scaffold strut healing was evaluated in vivo using weekly optical coherence tomography analysis. At 14 days, the AMA-BRS demonstrated a higher percentage of embedded struts (71.0% [47.6, 89.1] compared with BVS 40.3% [20.5, 63.2]; P=0.01). At 21 days, uncovered struts were still present in the BVS group (3.8% [2.1, 10.2]). Histopathology revealed lower area stenosis (AMA-BRS, 21.0±6.1% versus BVS 31.0±4.5%; P=0.002) in the AMA-BRS at 28 days. Neointimal thickness and inflammatory scores were comparable between both devices at 180 days. CONCLUSIONS: A new generation thinned wall BRS displayed a more favorable biomechanical behavior and strut healing profile compared with BVS in normal porcine coronary arteries. This novel BRS concept has the potential to improve the clinical outcomes of current generation BRS.

Four-year polymer biocompatibility and vascular healing profile of a novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an OCT study in healthy porcine coronary arteries.

AIMS: The vascular healing profile of polymers used in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) has not been fully characterised in the absence of antiproliferative drugs. In this study, we aimed to compare the polymer biocompatibility profile and vascular healing response of a novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA BRS (FORTITUDE®; Amaranth Medical, Mountain View, CA, USA) against bare metal stent (BMS) controls in porcine coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Following device implantation, optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation was performed at 0 and 28 days, and at one, two, three and four years. A second group of animals underwent histomorphometric evaluation at 28 and 90 days. At four years, both lumen (BRS 13.19±1.50 mm2 vs. BMS 7.69±2.41 mm2) and scaffold areas (BRS 15.62±1.95 mm2 vs. BMS 8.65±2.37 mm2) were significantly greater for BRS than BMS controls. The degree of neointimal proliferation was comparable between groups. Histology up to 90 days showed comparable healing and inflammation profiles for both devices. CONCLUSIONS: At four years, the novel PLLA BRS elicited a vascular healing response comparable to BMS in healthy pigs. Expansive vascular remodelling was evident only in the BRS group, a biological phenomenon that appears to be independent of the presence of antiproliferative drugs.

Comparative Characterization of Biomechanical Behavior and Healing Profile of a Novel Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Amorphous Poly-l-Lactic Acid Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold.

BACKGROUND: Clinically available bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) rely on polymer crystallinity to achieve mechanical strength resulting in limited overexpansion capabilities and structural integrity when exposed to high-loading conditions. We aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior and vascular healing profile of a novel, sirolimus-eluting, high-molecular-weight, amorphous poly-l-lactic acid-based BRS (Amaranth BRS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In vitro biomechanical testing was performed under static and cyclic conditions. A total of 99 devices (65 Amaranth BRS versus 34 Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold [BVS]) were implanted in 99 coronary arteries of 37 swine for pharmacokinetics and healing evaluation at various time points. In the Absorb BVS, the number of fractures per scaffold seen on light microscopy was 6.0 (5.0-10.5) when overexpanded 1.0 mm above nominal values (≈34%). No fractures were observed in the Amaranth BRS group at 1.3 mm above nominal values (≈48% overexpansion). The number of fractures was higher in the Absorb BVS on accelerated cycle testing over time (at 24K cycles=5.0 [5.0-9.0] Absorb BVS versus 0.0 [0.0-0.5] Amaranth BRS). Approximately 90% of sirolimus was found to be eluted by 90 days. Optical coherence tomography analysis demonstrated lower percentages of late scaffold recoil in the Amaranth BRS at 3 months (Amaranth BRS=-10±16.1% versus Absorb BVS=10.7±13.2%; P=0.004). Histopathology analysis revealed comparable levels of vascular healing and inflammatory responses between both BRSs up to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: New-generation high-molecular-weight amorphous poly-l-lactic acid scaffolds have the potential to improve the clinical performance of BRS and provide the ideal platform for the future miniaturization of the technology.