Validating a blood donation awareness tool created using general practitioner and patient acceptability and preferences.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to develop an awareness raising tool for GPs to reach out their patients in order to increase blood donation. The main objective was to create and validate a tool to raise awareness about blood donation that meets acceptability and preference criteria and is applicable in general practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in three phases. 1. Tool creation: A stakeholder meeting co-developed three potential tools to raise awareness about blood donation: a consulting room poster, a waiting room poster and a lapel badge for the doctor. Three GPs pilot-tested each tool for one day during their regular consultations. Then, once the pilot was completed each GP assessed acceptability and preference using a semi-structured interview, and patients were also interviewed. 2. Consensual tool selection: An appropriate tool was selected based on pilot data using nominal group technique and expert review. 3. The tool was validated for its acceptability in practice via a quantitative questionnaire distributed electronically to GPs. RESULTS: The consensual tool selected by the nominal group was a combination of elements from all three tools trialled in the pilot, reported to be non-intrusive and convenient for both GPs and patients. Patient responses indicated a high level of acceptability and indicated a strong preference for self-generated discussion of the topic with their GP. In the validation step, 217 responses to the quantitative questionnaire were received: 74.5% of responses fulfilled the acceptability criteria for using this combined tool in general practice. Furthermore, 93.1% of GPs indicated they would use the tool in the proposed format for the purpose of raising awareness. DISCUSSION: The validation of our blood donation awareness tool for use in general practice justifies its evaluation on a larger scale as part of a wider blood donation awareness campaign.

Male contraception: What do women think?

INTRODUCTION: Women currently bear the most responsibility in contraception, with a wide choice of methods, while only a few existing male contraceptives are available. However, it has been shown that men are willing to get involved in birth control and to control their own fertility. Our research was focused on female population and a survey was carried out to explore women's perceptions of male contraception. METHODS: An observational quantitative cross-sectional study using a self-administered-questionnaire was carried out between November 2019 and February 2020. All women aged from 16-years-old to menopause completing the questionnaire were included. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted, qualitative variables were expressed as counts and frequency. RESULTS: In total, 379 interpretable completed questionnaires were included. Among the women, 69.7% were in favour of letting men deal with contraception, without referring to a specific method. After having been made aware of the medical information concerning existing male contraceptives and those in development, the proportion of women in favour dropped to 46.7%. The most acceptable method for a majority of women was the male pill, which is still being developed. The majority (78.4%) of the women in our survey felt insufficiently informed about male contraception. DISCUSSION: In our study, women seemed to want to share contraceptive responsibility with men, but the lack of information and of acceptable contraception methods available remained an obstacle. Although larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these results, the development of a wider range of male contraception methods seems to be what both men and women have long been expecting.

Suspicious liver nodule in chronic liver disease: Usefulness of a second biopsy.

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of a second biopsy when the first one was inconclusive in patients with a liver nodule found during the follow-up for chronic liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 381 patients (544 nodules) included in a prospective study designed to evaluate the accuracy of imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic liver disease, 254 nodules were biopsied. The following histological results were considered as conclusive: HCC, dysplastic or regenerative nodule, and other identified tumors (benign or malignant). For nodules with inconclusive results (e.g. fibrosis or no definite focal lesion), a second biopsy was suggested, but was not mandatory. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients (194 men, 48 women; mean age, 61.9±9.5 [SD]; range: 40.2-89.0years) with 254 nodules underwent a first biopsy. Mean nodule diameter was 19.2±5.4mm (range: 10-33mm). The first biopsy was conclusive in 189/254 nodules (74.4%): 157 HCCs (83.1%), 11 regenerative nodules (5.8%), 10 dysplastic nodules (5.3%), 3 cholangiocarcinomas (1.6%), and 8 other tumors (4.2%). Among the 65 nodules for which the first biopsy was inconclusive, a second biopsy was performed for 17 nodules in 16 patients within 6 months of the first one. It was conclusive in 13/17 nodules (76.5%): 10 HCCs (76.9%), 2 dysplastic nodules (15.4%), and 1 other tumor (7.7%). In 4/17 nodules (23.5%), no definitive diagnosis could be provided. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield of a second biopsy of a suspicious lesion suggestive of HCC in chronic liver disease is not decreased compared to the first one. Repeated biopsy after a first negative one could be an alternative option to the follow-up of patients with chronic liver disease.