Pre-operative corticosteroid injection within 1 month of total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection.

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid injections (CSI) may increase the risk of peri-prosthetic infections (PJI) following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our study specifically assessed the risk of PJI in patients who received CSI: (1) less than 4 weeks prior to TSA; (2) 4-8 weeks prior to TSA; and (3) 8-12 weeks prior to TSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national all-payer database was queried to identify patients who underwent TSA with a shoulder osteoarthritis diagnosis from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n = 25,422). There were four cohorts: CSI within 4 weeks of TSA (n = 214), CSI 4-8 weeks prior to TSA (n = 473), CSI 8-12 weeks prior to TSA (n = 604), and a control cohort that did not receive CSI (n = 15,486). Bivariate chi-square analyses of outcomes were performed in addition to multivariate regression. RESULTS: A significant increase in PJI risk at 1 year (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.19-3.99, p = 0.007) and 2 years (OR = 2.03, CI = 1.09-3.46, p = 0.016) in patients who received CSI within 1 month of TSA was noted. PJI risk was not significantly increased at any time point for patients who received a CSI greater than 4 weeks prior to TSA (all p ≥ 0.396). CONCLUSION: PJI risk is increased at both 1 and 2 years post-operatively in patients who received a CSI within 4 weeks of TSA. Therefore, TSA should be deferred at least 4 weeks after a patient receives a CSI to mitigate PJI risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Temporary Intramedullary Nail: Is a Long or Short Nail Better?

To our knowledge, no studies have compared postoperative outcomes between patients who received a temporary short or long intramedullary (IM) nail in the setting of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes for patients who underwent long or short IM nail insertion for treatment of periprosthetic knee infection. Specifically, we compared: (1) success rates; (2) patient reported/functional outcomes; and (3) complications between patients implanted with a short or a long IM nail following PJI of the knee. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty with a temporary long or short IM nail between November 2010 and June 2018 at our institution (n = 67). Continuous and categorical variables were assessed using t-test/Mann-Whitney U test and chi-squared test, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the effect of IM nail length on success rate while adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and race. A total of 36 patients underwent temporary treatment with a long IM nail, while 31 patients received a short IM nail. There were no differences in success rate for reimplanted patients treated with long and short IM nails (odds ratio 0.992; p = 0.847). Fewer patients with a long IM nail went on to reimplantation (52.8 vs. 83.9%; p = 0.007). There was no difference in satisfaction (7.86 vs. 7.68; p = 0.515), pain scores (3.39 vs. 4.45 points; p = 0.126), or Knee Society score outcome scores (150.61 vs. 166.26 points; p = 0.117) between long or short IM nail patients. Following reimplantation, there was no difference in the number of patients who became reinfected (15.8 vs. 11.5%; p = 0.679) or went on to amputation (0 vs. 7.7%; p = 0.210). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but serious postoperative complication following TKA. Our findings suggest that the use of long and short IM nails during two-stage exchange can have equal utility in PJI patients with severe bone defects.

National Trends for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty After the Affordable Care Act: An Analysis From 2011 to 2015.

Few studies have investigated nationwide patient trends and health care costs for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after 2014. This study uses a large validated nationwide database to retrospectively assess changes in patient and hospital demographic features, hospital costs, and hospital charges for inpatient RSA procedures before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who underwent RSA between January 2011 and December 2015, yielding 163,171 patients (63.4% female; mean age, 72 years). Categorical data were assessed with chi-square/Fisher's exact test, and continuous data were assessed with analysis of variance. There was an increased proportion of RSA recipients identifying as Hispanic (4.1% to 4.8%) and Native American (0.1% to 0.4%; P<.0001). The proportion of patients who had Medicaid (1.4% to 2.4%) and private insurance (15.1% to 16.6%) increased as well (P<.0001). A decrease in mean hospital costs occurred between 2011 and 2015 (-$256; P=.002), whereas an increase occurred in hospital charges (+$6,314; P<.001). These findings provide insight on RSA use and patient demographic trends in the United States. Additionally, these results help to capture the effects of extended health coverage and new reimbursement models on hospital costs and charges. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):97-102.].

Utilisation of calcium sulphate beads in one-stage aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects many revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients, contributing to a concomitant rise in revision costs. Means of decreasing the risk of PJI include the use of antibiotic adjuncts, such as calcium sulphate beads (CSBs). Mixed with antibiotics, the potential benefits of CSBs include dissolvability and antibiotic drug elution. However, information comparing them in aseptic revision is scarce. Therefore, this study investigated CSB utilisation for infection prevention in aseptic revision THA. Specifically, we compared (1) infection rates; (2) lengths of stay; (3) subsequent infection procedures; and (4) final surgical outcome in 1-stage aseptic revision THA patients who did received CSBs to 1-stage aseptic revision THA patients who did not. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who underwent an aseptic revision THA between January 2013 and December 2017. Patients who received CSBs (n = 48) were compared to non-CSB patients (n = 58) on the following outcomes: postoperative infections, lengths of stay (LOS), subsequent irrigation and debridements (I+Ds), and final surgical outcome, classified as successful THA reimplantation, retained antibiotic spacer, or Girdlestone procedure. Chi-square and t-testing were used to analyse the variables. RESULTS: There was no significant differences found between CSB patients and non-CSB patients in postoperative infections (p = 0.082), LOS (p = 0.179), I+Ds (p = 0.068), and final surgical outcome (p = 0.211). CONCLUSION: This study did not find any statistical difference between CSBs and standard of care in infection rates and surgical outcomes. The advantage of these beads for 1-stage aseptic revisions is questionable.

Inpatient dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: incidence and associated patient and hospital factors.

INTRODUCTION: Inpatient dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) may incur substantial financial penalties for hospitals in the United States. However, limited studies report on current incidence and variability of dislocations. We utilised a large national database to evaluate inpatient hip dislocation trends regarding: (1) yearly incidences; (2) lengths of stay (LOS); (3) demographic factors; and (4) hospital metrics. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2012 to2016 for primary THA patients (n = 1,610,155), identifying 2490 inpatient dislocations. Various patient demographics and hospital characteristics were assessed. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify dislocation risk factors. RESULTS: Dislocation rates increased from 0.11% in 2012 to 0.18% in 2016 (p < 0.001). Dislocated patients experienced significantly longer LOS (p < 0.001). Patient demographic factors associated with dislocation were sex, race, Medicaid insurance, alcohol use disorder, psychosis, hemiparesis/hemiplegia, chronic renal failure, and obesity. Spinal fusion was not associated with inpatient dislocation. Dislocations were likeliest in the South and least likely in teaching hospitals. CONCLUSION: Inpatient dislocation has increased in recent years. Optimised management and recognition of the patient and hospital factors outlined in this study may help decrease inpatient dislocation risks following THA, thus avoiding hospital reimbursement penalties for this preventable complication.

Complications Associated With Same-Day Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasties.

Same-day bilateral total knee arthroplasties (SBTKAs) are associated with shorter rehabilitation and lower cost. However, controversy surrounding the safety of SBTKAs exists. Recent studies are lacking to determine whether patient selection has brought SBTKA in line with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (UTKA). Therefore, the authors evaluated and compared patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and inpatient course between UTKA and SBTKA from 2009 to 2016. The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2009 to 2016 for UTKA and SBTKA patients. Of the 5,329,466 patients identified, 5,084,328 (95.4%) patients received UTKAs and 245,138 (4.6%) patients underwent SBTKAs. Incidence, rate, patient and hospital characteristics, health status, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, hospital charges, hospital costs, and complications were analyzed and statistically compared. The incidence (-1.4%) and rate (15.8%) of SBTKAs decreased (both P<.001). The SBTKA cohort had more patients who were younger, male, White, obese, healthier, and using private insurance (P<.001 for all). The SBTKA cohort had longer LOS, a higher proportion of discharges to skilled nursing facilities, higher cost and charges, and more complications, including deep venous thromboses/pulmonary emboli (DVT/PE) and transfusions (P<.001 for all). Conversely, SBTKA was associated with fewer myocardial infarctions (P<.001). Although improved from previous literature, SBTKA is still associated with longer LOS, higher cost and charges, and more complications, including DVT/PE and transfusions, although with a lower rate of myocardial infarction. However, studies are needed to determine whether the risk of 1 SBTKA outweighs the cumulative risk of staged UTKAs. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e407-e413.].

Wide-awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet: An Updated Review.

The wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique has become popularized for various hand/upper extremity procedures. Before surgery, patients receive local anesthetic, consisting of lidocaine with epinephrine, and remain awake for the entire procedure. The purpose of this review was to investigate the advantages, diverse application, outcomes, cost benefits, use in challenging environments, patient considerations, and contraindications associated with WALANT. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature on the WALANT technique was conducted. Search terms included: WALANT, wide-awake surgery, no tourniquet, local anesthesia, hand, wrist, cost, and safety. RESULTS: The WALANT technique has proven to be successful for common procedures such as flexor tendon repair, tendon transfer, trigger finger releases, Depuytren disease, and simple bony procedures. Recently, the use of WALANT has expanded to more extensive soft-tissue repair, fracture management, and bony manipulation. Advantages include negating preoperative evaluation and testing for anesthesia clearance, eliminating risk of monitored anesthesia care, removal of anesthesia providers and ancillary staff, significant cost savings, and less waste produced. Intraoperative evaluations can be performed through active patient participation, and postoperative recovery and monitoring time are reduced. WALANT is associated with high patient satisfaction rates and low infection rates. CONCLUSIONS: The WALANT technique has proven to be valuable to both patients and providers, optimizing patient satisfaction and providing substantial healthcare savings. As its application continues to grow, current literature suggests positive outcomes.

Comparing Outcomes for Female Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Under Global Budget Revenue.

Maryland implemented the all-payer, rater-setting Global Budget Revenue (GBR) payment model in 2014 to reduce cost and improve quality. This study assessed the effect of GBR on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes by sex. Specifically, the authors assessed (1) demographics and (2) outcomes of males and females undergoing TKA before and after GBR implementation. The Maryland State Inpatient Database was queried from 2011 to 2016. There were 71,066 TKAs (male, n=25,413; female, n=45,634). For continuous and categorical variables, t testing and chi-square analyses were used, respectively. Difference-in-difference analyses using multiple regression compared changes in sex from the pre-GBR period (2011-2013) with the post-GBR period (2014-2016). The female proportion decreased (-1.9%; P=.040). Proportionally more TKA patients were Hispanic and Asian, from high-income areas, using Medicare and Medicaid, and morbidly obese (all P<.001). The mean length of stay (LOS), charges, and costs were decreased after GBR implementation (all P<.001). More patients were discharged routine and had fewer readmissions (both P<.001). There were fewer complications, including deep venous thromboses/pulmonary emboli, urinary tract infections, and blood transfusions (all P<.001). The difference-in-difference analyses suggested more females were discharged with home health care and had longer LOS than did males (both P<.001). The GBR appears to meet its main objective of cost reduction and improvements in quality of care. However, the proportion of females receiving TKA decreased, and their LOS did not improve as much as that of males. As other states consider global budgets, more research is needed to ensure this all-payer, rate-setting, capitated system does not cause decreased access to care. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e266-e273.].

Two-Stage Exchange Using a Short Intramedullary Nail for Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infections: A Technique Worth Questioning.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are serious orthopaedic complications that pose marked burdens to both patients and health care systems. At our institution, two-stage exchange with a temporary short antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nail was utilized for the treatment of repeat PJIs in a series of compromised patients with considerable bone loss. This study reports on (1) success rates, (2) functional and pain outcomes, (3) and complications for patients receiving a temporary short intramedullary nail for the treatment of PJI. Our institutional database was queried for all repeat knee PJI patients between March 1st, 2009 and February 28th, 2015. Patients with type II/III Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defects who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty with a short antibiotic-coated intramedullary nail were included for analysis (n = 31). Treatment success was determined using the Delphi-based consensus definition of a successfully treated PJI: infection eradication (healed wound with no recurrence of infection by the same organism), no further surgical intervention for infection after reimplantation, and no PJI-related mortality. A paired t-test was performed to assess for continuous variables. A total of 26 patients went on to reimplantation, while 5 patients retained the intramedullary nail. Overall treatment success was 74.2%. Range of motion significantly decreased postoperatively (102.1 vs. 87.3 degrees; p < 0.001), while Knee Society Scores (function) significantly increased (55.6 vs. 77.7, p < 0.001). A majority of patients were full weight-bearing immediately following surgery (38.7%). Treating poor health status patients with PJI of the knee can be difficult after multiple revisions. With a success rate similar to conventional methods, our results demonstrate that two-stage exchange with a temporary short intramedullary nail may be a desirable treatment option for patients with bony defects wishing to avoid amputation or permanent arthrodesis. However, this method does not outperform other treatment modalities, and may not be suitable for all patients. Patient expectations and health status should be carefully assessed to determine if this procedure is appropriate in this complex patient population.

Management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

AIMS: Earlier studies dealing with trends in the management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) identified an increasing rate of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and a decreasing rate of joint-preserving procedures between 1992 and 2008. In an effort to assess new trends in the management of this condition, this study evaluated the annual trends of joint-preserving versus arthroplasties for patients aged < or > 50 years old, and the incidence of specific operative management techniques. METHODS: A total of 219,371 patients with ONFH were identified from a nationwide database between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2015. The mean age was 54 years (18 to 90) and 105,298 (48%) were female. The diagnosis was made using International Classification of Disease, Ninth revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) procedure codes. The percentage of patients managed using each procedure during each year was calculated and compared between years. The trends in the use of the types of procedure were also evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of joint-preserving procedures was significantly higher in patients aged < 50 years compared with those aged > 50 years (4.93% vs 1.52%; p < 0.001). For the overall cohort, rates of arthroplasty were far greater than those for joint-preserving procedures. THA was the most commonly performed procedure (291,114; 94.03%), while osteotomy (3,598; 1.16%), partial arthroplasty (9,171; 2.96%), core decompression (1,200; 0.39%), and bone graft (3,026; 0.98%) were performed markedly less frequently. The annual percentage of patients managed using a THA (93.56% to 89.52%; p < 0.001), resurfacing (1.22% to 0.19%; p < 0.001), and osteotomy (1.31% to 1.05%; p < 0.001) also decreased during the study period. CONCLUSION: We found that patients with ONFH have been most commonly managed with non-joint-preserving procedures. Our findings provide valuable insight into the current management of this condition and should increase efforts being made to save the hip joint. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):122-128.

Pain Intensity: How Press Ganey Survey Domains Correlate in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Decreasing postoperative pain for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients has been an area of continued effort for healthcare providers. These efforts have been incentivized by legislative reform, which ties reimbursement for hospitals and providers to patient perception of care. Press Ganey (PG) surveys quantify patient satisfaction, and the "pain management" domain is thought to be the best metric for assessing pain intensity. Therefore, these responses are important, as they are used to guide further improvements in healthcare delivery. This study analyzes which PG survey domains are truly associated with pain intensity in the immediate postoperative period following TKA. We queried our PG database for all primary TKA patients between November 2012 and January 2015, yielding a total of 214 patients. Multivariate regression analysis was performed utilizing pain intensity as the dependent variable. Predictor variables included body mass index (BMI), Charlson's comorbidity index, opioid consumption, and PG survey domains. Patient ratings of "communication with doctors" (B = 58.147; p = 0.001), "responsiveness of hospital staff" (B = - 62.663; p = 0.041), "communication about medicines" (B= -45.037; p < 0.001), and "hospital environment" (B = 69.342; p = 0.017) were associated with patient pain intensity. We found survey domains, other than "pain management," were associated with pain intensity. Efforts to improve outcomes and satisfaction should focus on staff education and communication. The current method for measuring patient satisfaction and reimbursement should be critically assessed and redesigned to better reflect true patient experiences.

Pain intensity in total hip arthroplasty patients: how communication influences satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: An important global measure of health care quality is patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction partially determines hospital reimbursement for procedures such as total hip arthroplasty (THA). Press Ganey (PG) survey responses assess patient satisfaction, and impact reimbursement. Current efforts to maximise repayment for THA include reducing postoperative pain. The "Pain Management" survey domain is considered a significant factor in patient ratings, but other studies have highlighted staff communication domains as determinants of satisfaction. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare PG survey responses to inpatient pain intensity. METHODS: We queried the PG database for all patients who underwent a THA between November 2012 and January 2015. This yielded a total of 302 patients. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyse patient-level demographics. A multivariate regression model was constructed utilising pain intensity as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Patients rating of "Communication with Doctors" (B = -25.534; p < 0.001) and "Communication about Medicines" (B = -31.49; p = < 0.001) domains were representative of patient pain intensity. No other factors demonstrated a significant relationship to pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction continues to be important in care quality. Surrogate markers, such as the PG survey, can guide institutions looking to improve care. Our study revealed scores for "Communication with Doctors" and "Communication about Medicines" best represented true pain intensity levels for THA recipients during the postoperative period. The "Pain Management" domain did not display a relationship to pain intensity. The current method of measuring patient satisfaction should be reassessed to better represent patient responses and outcomes.

Changes in Total Knee Arthroplasty Utilization since the Implementation of ACA: An Analysis of Patient-Hospital Demographics, Costs, and Charges.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) formed the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center which has implemented experimental reimbursement models targeted at high-demand procedures to improve care quality. However, the effect of health care reform on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures has not been explored. This study explores patient-hospital level demographics, inpatient costs, and charges related to TKA procedures between 2009 and 2015. The National Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify patients who received primary TKA between January 2009 and October 2015 (4,283,387 cases). Categorical, continuous, and ordinal data were analyzed using chi-square/Fisher's exact test, t-test/analysis of variance, or Kruskal-Wallis' test, respectively. There was an increase in proportion of TKA recipients belonging to minority groups and the lowest quartile of median income (p < 0.05). There was a 1.9% increase in recipients using Medicaid as a primary payor and volume shifts from urban nonteaching toward urban teaching hospitals. There was a reduction in mean length of stay and mean inpatient costs. There were increases in hospital charges, but reductions in rates of inpatient mortality, and other postoperative complications. TKA procedures remain the most common surgical procedure; therefore, our study assessed national trends to capture the effect of PPACA. We found an increasing proportion of TKA recipients belonging to minority and low-income groups, volume shifts to urban teaching hospitals, and lower costs of care. These findings may be useful in objectively critiquing the effects of PPACA on TKA-related care.

Rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty: a review of study designs and outcome measures.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is among the most common elective procedures performed worldwide. Recent efforts have been made to significantly improve patient outcomes, specifically with postoperative rehabilitation. Despite the many rehabilitation modalities available, the optimal rehabilitation strategy has yet to be determined. Therefore, this systematic review focuses on evaluating existing postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Specifically, this review analyses the study designs, rehabilitation methods, and outcome measures of postoperative rehabilitation protocols for TKA recipients in the past five years. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies evaluating rehabilitation protocols following primary TKA. Of the 11,013 studies identified within the last five years, 70 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After assessing for relevance and removing duplicates, a final count of 20 studies remained for analysis. Level-of-evidence was determined by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification system. Our findings demonstrated that continuous passive motion and inpatient rehabilitation may not provide additional benefit to the patient or healthcare system. However, early rehabilitation, telerehabilitation, outpatient therapy, high intensity, and high velocity exercise may be successful forms of rehabilitation. Additionally, weight-bearing biofeedback, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and balance control appear to be beneficial adjuncts to conventional rehabilitation. Postoperative rehabilitation following TKA facilitates patient recovery and improves quality of life. This systematic review analyzed the existing rehabilitation protocols from the past five years. Some studies did not accurately describe the conventional rehabilitation protocols, the duration of therapy sessions, and the timing of these sessions. As such, future studies should explicitly describe their methodology. This will allow high-quality assessments and the conception of standardized protocols.

Short-term outcomes of the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral versus direct lateral approach to primary total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most successful orthopaedic procedures, it is not without complications. As such, finding the optimal surgical approach has become an area of particular interest. In this study, we compare: (1) pain intensity; (2) opioid consumption; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) complication rates; (5) discharge destination; and (6) ambulatory function between patients who underwent THA via the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral (MS-ALA) and conventional direct lateral (DLA) approaches. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 220 consecutive patients who received primary THA using the supine MS-ALA (n = 101) or DLA (n = 119) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, LOS, discharge destination, complications, additional procedures, and time to independent ambulation. RESULTS: We demonstrated significantly lower opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 (mean differences, -32.0 and -28.4 mg, respectively; p ⩽ 0.001) and decreased pain intensity during the second 24 hours of the hospital stay (mean difference, -22.0; p < 0.001) in patients receiving the MS-ALA. Relative to the DLA cohort, patients in the MS-ALA cohort were 2.04 times more likely to be discharged to home (p = 0.028) and 1.91 times less likely to experience postoperative abductor insufficiency (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The present study is the 1st to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly pain intensity and opioid consumption, between the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral and direct lateral THA approaches. Further research should investigate the effect of surgical approach on quality and cost of care, include larger sample sizes, and involve longer-term follow-up.

Use of new interactive patient-provider software improves patient satisfaction and outcomes-a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: While a number of studies have explored patient- and provider-related factors contributing to quality of care, few studies have explored the role of technology in improving quality and optimizing patient-provider communication. This study explores the use of an interactive patient-provider software platform (IPSP) at a single institution. Specifically, we compared: (1) patient satisfaction scores, (2) complication rates, and (3) readmission rates before and after the use of an IPSP on patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients who completed a Press Ganey survey at a single institution between the years 2014 and 2017. Primary outcomes included Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores and 90-day complication and readmission rates. Mann-Whitney U testing and chi-squared analyses were conducted to assess continuous and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Analysis revealed an improvement in median Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (89 vs 97) and Hospital for Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores (9 vs 10; P < .001) between pre-IPSP and post-IPSP. There was a decrease in 90-day complication rates (17.3 vs 11.2%; P = .035) but no decrease in readmission rates (0.30 vs 0.18%, P = .322) between the 2 time points. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an IPSP proved instrumental in improving patient satisfaction and lowering 90-day complication rates at a single institution. The implementation of an IPSP may prove beneficial to arthroplasty surgeons and health-care institutions alike seeking to optimize the quality of care. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to validate the results of the present study.

Adjunctive Intravenous Diclofenac Decreases Opioid Consumption and Increases Satisfaction in the Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Population.

Despite the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), postoperative pain management remains a concern. Although the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intravenous (IV) diclofenac is a promising addition, its impact on THA outcomes has not been investigated. This study evaluates the effects of adjunctive IV diclofenac on: 1) postoperative pain intensity; 2) opioid consumption; 3) discharge destination; 4) length of stay; and 5) patient satisfaction in primary THA patients. A retrospective study was performed for patients who underwent primary THA by a single surgeon between May 1 and September 31, 2017. Patients of the study group (n=25) were treated postoperatively with IV diclofenac and the standard pain control regimen while the control group (n=88) did not receive diclofenac. Patients receiving adjunctive IV diclofenac were more likely to be discharged home than to inpatient facilities (O.R. 4.02; p=0.049). Patient satisfaction with respect to how well and how often pain was controlled (p= 0.0436 and p=0.0217, respectively) was significantly greater in the IV diclofenac group. Patients who received IV diclofenac had lower opioid consumption on postoperative days one and two (-67.2 and -129.0mg, respectively; p=0.001 for both). The growth of THA as an outpatient procedure has intensified the urgency of improving postoperative pain management. This study demonstrates that THA patients receiving adjunctive IV diclofenac were more likely to be discharged home, had reduced opioid consumption, and experienced greater satisfaction. To further investigate the optimal regimen, future studies comprising a larger cohort and comparing IV diclofenac to other NSAIDs are warranted.

Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The use of biologic therapies for the management of knee osteoarthritis has increased, despite insufficient evidence of efficacy. Our aim was to complete a systematic review and analysis of reports utilizing the highest level-of-evidence evaluating: (1) platelet-rich plasma injections (PRPs); (2) bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); (3) adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs); and (4) amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies evaluating PRP injections, BMSCs, ADSCs, and AMSCs in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Of 1009 studies identified within the last 5 years, 123 met inclusion criteria. A comprehensive analysis of all levels-of-evidence was performed, as well as separate analysis on level-of-evidence I studies. Level-of-evidence was determined by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons classification system. RESULTS: Although the majority of PRP reports demonstrated improvements in pain and/or function, others revealed no substantial improvements. Similar findings were noted for BMSCs, ADSCs, and AMSCs. Assessments of BMSC studies yielded majority with positive clinical results, although short-lived. Studies on ADSCs revealed improved clinical outcomes, but equivocal radiographic outcomes. Studies evaluating AMSCs demonstrated improvements in pain and function, and decreased radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Despite some promising early results for PRP, BMSC, ADSC, and AMSC therapies, the majority of level-of-evidence I studies have multiple problems: small sample sizes, potentially inappropriate control cohorts, short-term follow-up, and so on. Despite the limitations, there still appears to be evidence justifying their use for knee osteoarthritis management. More high-level, larger human studies utilizing standardized protocols are needed.