von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF-Ag): A non-invasive predictor of treatment response and serious adverse events in HCV patients with interferon triple therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was revolutionized within the last years. Interferon free antiviral regimens are not accessible without limitations. Combination of peginterferon/ribavirin with first generation direct acting antivirals is less effective and associated with serious adverse events. AIM: We have shown that vWF-Ag is associated with portal hypertension and treatment response to PEG/RBV and we evaluated if vWF-Ag is a predictive marker for treatment response and safety in patients with triple therapy. METHODS: 222 HCV-GT 1 patients and DAA based triple therapy were included in this retrospective, multicenter study. RESULTS: Median vWF-Ag levels were 167.0% [IQR: 124.0-210.0%]. Significantly higher levels were seen in patients without SVR; median 190% [IQR: 146.0-259.5%] versus SVR: 142.5% [IQR: 114.3-196.8%], p<0.001. Furthermore levels of vWF-Ag were identified as independent predictor of non SVR; (OR: 1.009; 95%CI: 1.016-1.3, p=0.005). In patients with cirrhosis elevated vWF-Ag levels were associated with increased incidence of SAEs (OR: 1.016; 95%CI: 1.004-1.028; p=0.007). Best cut off for prediction of SAEs was vWF-Ag>281.5% with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSION: Baseline vWF-Ag levels predict outcome of DAA based treatment in HCV-1 patients and identify patients with a risk of SAEs. Therefore vWF-Ag may be an additional marker for selecting patients for interferon free therapeutic regimens.

The VITRO Score (Von Willebrand Factor Antigen/Thrombocyte Ratio) as a New Marker for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Comparison to Other Non-Invasive Parameters of Fibrosis Including ELF Test.

BACKGROUND: Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), defined as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg, causes major complications. HVPG is not always available, so a non-invasive tool to diagnose CSPH would be useful. VWF-Ag can be used to diagnose. Using the VITRO score (the VWF-Ag/platelet ratio) instead of VWF-Ag itself improves the diagnostic accuracy of detecting cirrhosis/ fibrosis in HCV patients. AIM: This study tested the diagnostic accuracy of VITRO score detecting CSPH compared to HVPG measurement. METHODS: All patients underwent HVPG testing and were categorised as CSPH or no CSPH. The following patient data were determined: CPS, D'Amico stage, VITRO score, APRI and transient elastography (TE). RESULTS: The analysis included 236 patients; 170 (72%) were male, and the median age was 57.9 (35.2-76.3; 95% CI). Disease aetiology included ALD (39.4%), HCV (23.4%), NASH (12.3%), other (8.1%) and unknown (11.9%). The CPS showed 140 patients (59.3%) with CPS A; 56 (23.7%) with CPS B; and 18 (7.6%) with CPS C. 136 patients (57.6%) had compensated and 100 (42.4%) had decompensated cirrhosis; 83.9% had HVPG ≥10 mmHg. The VWF-Ag and the VITRO score increased significantly with worsening HVPG categories (P<0.0001). ROC analysis was performed for the detection of CSPH and showed AUC values of 0.92 for TE, 0.86 for VITRO score, 0.79 for VWF-Ag, 0.68 for ELF and 0.62 for APRI. CONCLUSION: The VITRO score is an easy way to diagnose CSPH independently of CPS in routine clinical work and may improve the management of patients with cirrhosis.

Performance of 2-D shear wave elastography in liver fibrosis assessment compared with serologic tests and transient elastography in clinical routine.

Liver stiffness values assessed with 2-D shear wave elastography (SWE), transient elastography (TE) and simple serologic tests were compared with respect to non-invasive assessment in a cohort of 127 consecutive patients with chronic liver diseases. The rate of reliable liver stiffness measurements was significantly higher with 2-D SWE than with TE: 99.2% versus 74.8%, p < 0.0001 (different reliability criteria used, according to current recommendations). In univariate analysis, liver stiffness measured with 2-D SWE correlated best with fibrosis stage estimated with TE (r = 0.699, p < 0.0001), followed by Forns score (r = 0.534, p < 0.0001) and King's score (r = 0.512, p < 0.0001). However, in multivariate analysis, only 2-D SWE-measured values remained correlated with fibrosis stage (p < 0.0001). The optimal 2-D SWE cutoff values for predicting significant fibrosis were 8.03 kPa for fibrosis stage ≥2 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.832) and 13.1 kPa for fibrosis stage 4 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.915), respectively. In conclusion, 2-D SWE can be used to obtain reliable liver stiffness measurements in almost all patients and performs very well in predicting the presence of liver cirrhosis.