New findings on inhibitor development: from registries to clinical studies.

The high incidence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in patients with haemophilia A has encouraged debate as to whether product-type plays a role. There is debate in the literature as to whether rFVIII concentrates are associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors compared to pdFVIII products. The management of haemophilia in patients with inhibitors includes on-demand/prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents, and/or immune tolerance induction (ITI). However, these options create an economic and emotional burden on patients, their families and healthcare practitioners. Although ITI eliminates inhibitors successfully in 60-80% of cases, it is costly. Despite high costs, preliminary data from a decision analytical model have indicated that ITI is economically advantageous compared with on-demand/prophylactic treatment with bypassing agents. In patients with persistent inhibitors and those who are not candidates for ITI or have failed ITI, bleeding-related mortality and morbidity increase and quality of life decreases, compared with non-inhibitor patients. This article provides an update on the risk of inhibitor development and discusses best management approaches for patients with high-risk factors for inhibitor development.

Rate of inhibitor development in previously untreated hemophilia A patients treated with plasma-derived or recombinant factor VIII concentrates: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Different rates of inhibitor development after either plasma-derived (pdFVIII) or recombinant (rFVIII) FVIII have been suggested. However, conflicting results are reported in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the incidence rates of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with hemophilia A treated with either pdFVIII or rFVIII and to explore the influence of both study and patient characteristics. METHODS: Summary incidence rates (95% confidence interval) from all included studies for both pdFVIII and rFVIII results were recalculated and pooled. Sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the effect of study design, severity of disease and inhibitor characteristics. Meta-regression and analysis-of-variance were used to investigate the effect of covariates (testing frequency, follow-up duration and intensity of treatment). RESULTS: Two thousand and ninety-four patients (1965 treated with pdFVIII, 887 with rFVIII; median age, 9.6 months) from 24 studies were investigated and 420 patients were observed to develop inhibitors. Pooled incidence rate was 14.3% (10.4-19.4) for pdFVIII and 27.4% (23.6-31.5) for rFVIII; high responding inhibitor incidence rate was 9.3% (6.2-13.7) for pdFVIII and 17.4% (14.2-21.2) for rFVIII. In the multi-way anova study design, study period, testing frequency and median follow-up explained most of the variability, while the source of concentrate lost statistical significance. It was not possible to analyse the effect of intensity of treatment or trigger events such as surgery, and to completely exclude multiple reports of the same patient or changes of concentrate. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need for randomized controlled trials to address whether or not the risk of inhibitor in PUPs with hemophilia A differs between rFVIII and pdFVIII.

Neonatal sepsis: a challenge in hemostaseology.

Several therapeutic approaches to sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) have shown promising results in animal models. Large controlled trials in humans, however, have failed to show a clearly beneficial effect of a single drug or substance on outcome and survival so that treatment remains uncertain. As one researcher stated: ". . . sepsis is a classical example of a disease greater than the sum of its parts; it is a complex process in which intervention in one area might have only a modest effect on the final outcome." We believe that the complex pathophysiological setting of septic shock will undoubtedly require a multifaceted approach. Consequently, we attempt to arrest DIC and restore adequate tissue perfusion by intervention with heparin, AT and if possible protein C (PC) in the earliest stage of the disease, with the aim of blocking ongoing microthrombus formation and to support fibrinolysis. Growing understanding of the basic underlying mechanisms teaches us how to successfully stabilise the individual decompensated sub-systems like coagulation in septic patients. We should learn to accept these steps to reach the goal of a better outcome in terms of survival in this devastating illness.

Replacement therapy with protein C concentrate in infants and adolescents with meningococcal sepsis and purpura fulminans.

We report the effects of substitution with a virus-inactivated protein C (PC) concentrate in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in infants and children with meningococcal sepsis associated with purpura fulminans. It was a prospective open-label study. Eight pediatric and adolescent patients age 0.2 to 18.25 years with DIC associated with severe acquired PC deficiency (range 0.02 to 0.48 IU/mL; median, 0.22 IU/mL) in meningococcal septic shock and purpura fulminans were studied. Replacement therapy was initiated with a virus-inactivated PC concentrate with an initial intravenous bolus of 80 to 120 IU/kg followed by 50 IU/kg up to six times per day as an adjunctive therapeutic regimen to otherwise optimal intensive care treatment. After initial PC administration, plasma PC levels rose to normal ranges and were maintained under PC replacement therapy. Improving or even normalizing global hemostatic parameters were assessed in all patients. Markedly elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels prior to treatment, reflecting a reduced fibrinolytic potential, decreased rapidly under PC substitution. Concomitantly improving signs of purpura fulminans reflected by decreasing size of skin lesions, demonstrated a restoring microcirculation. Six of the eight patients survived. One patient required limb amputation; two patients died because of multiorgan failure. Both presented with a severely low plasma PC activity of 0.02 IU/mL on admission to the hospital. No adverse effects were observed with the PC concentrate administration. It can be concluded that the administration of PC concentrate had a marked benefit on the deranged coagulation status of patients with purpura fulminans and meningococcal septicemia. Normalization or even partial correction of hemostasis as well as improvement of microcirculation accompanied by improving signs of purpura fulminans were demonstrated in all patients.

Portal vein thrombosis in a patient with severe haemophilia A and F V G1691A mutation during continuous infusion of F VIII after intramural jejunal bleeding--successful thrombolysis under heparin therapy.

UNLABELLED: We report on a 14-year-old boy with severe haemophilia A who developed a portal vein thrombosis during continuous infusion of F VIII. For treatment of a posttraumatic intramural jejunal haematoma with extension into the mesenterium the patient received continuous infusion (CI) of a high purity F VIII concentrate, starting with an initial bolus injection of 100 IU F VIII/kg bw and followed by 4-5 IU F VIII/kg bw/h i.v. F VIII plasma activity ranged between 47 and 88%. Resorption of the haematoma was proven by abdominal ultrasonic follow-ups. After 3 weeks of CI a thrombus formation in the portal vein was detected by ultrasound and confirmed by duplex ultrasound. Subsequent to diagnosis the patient was heparinised with unfractionated heparin (UFH 300-450 IU/kg/d i.v.). In order to induce further resorption of the haematoma. F VIII concentrate was given concomitantly (50 IU/kg bw twice daily) during the initial phase of treatment. After 14 days of anticoagulant therapy with UFH, the regimen was changed to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; Fraxiparin 0.3; 2850 IU anti-X activity/d s.c.; bw 60 kg). F VIII dosage was gradually reduced with advanced resorption of the haematoma and thereafter switched to prophylaxis (40 IU/kg bw 3 times weekly). Complete lysis of the thrombus was observed after 6 months of treatment with UFH and LMWH respectively without any further complications. Thereafter LMWH was discontinued. Thrombophilic screening revealed no abnormalities except heterozygous F V G1691A. CONCLUSION: The coexistence of a common prothrombotic risk factor and haemophilia may cause severe complications, in particular if the bleeding disorder has to be corrected temporarily by administration of the concerning deficient agent.