Multimodal analysis of the biomechanical impact of knee angle on the Sit-to-Stand transition.

BACKGROUND: The Sit-to-Stand (STS) transition is one of the most used activities of daily living and vital for independence. Neurological, or physical injuries impairing functional mobility or sensory feedback often require rehabilitative programs or therapeutic interventions. Understanding the biomechanical elements of daily movements and the interaction between these elements may help inform rehabilitation protocols and optimize targeted interventions, such as stimulation protocols. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of different initial knee angle, arm facilitation and proprioceptive input on leg muscle activation patterns and balance during and after a sit-to-stand? METHODS: EMG of four lower limb muscles were recorded in 20 healthy participants as well centre-of-pressure sway amplitude and velocity, as participants stood from a seated position. Initial knee angles were set to various levels of extension (80°, 90°, 100°) and surface stability and arm facilitation were altered using a foam mat or crossing arms. Data were analysed across 3 phases of the STS transition. RESULTS: More extended knee angles resulted in greater mediolateral sway during each phase (p < .01) and had a detrimental effect on anterior-posterior sway in phases 1 and 3. EMG data suggested more extended initial knee angles also increased EMG activity of the Tibialis Anterior (p < .001) and Bicep Femoris (p < .02) within Phases 1 and 2 to assist lift and stabilisation. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings of this study outline phase-based muscle involvement as well as the compounding effects of reduced proprioceptive input and knee angle, on difficulty of the STS transition. Such results emphasising the need to take sensory and mobility issues into consideration when designing rehabilitative programs or stimulation control systems.

Contralateral Selectivity of Upper-Limb Motor Pools via Targeted Stimulation of the Cervical Spinal Cord.

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) at the cervical level may facilitate improved upper-limb function in those with incomplete tetraplegia. While clinical trials are ongoing, there is still much debate regarding the transmission pathway as well as appropriate stimulation parameters. This study aimed to explore the extent to which cervical tSCS can induce mono-synaptic reflexes in discrete upper-limb motor pools and examine the effects of altering stimulus location and intensity. METHODS: Fourteen participants with intact nervous systems completed two laboratory visits, during which posterior root-muscle reflexes (PRMRs) were evoked via a 3 × 3 cathode matrix applied over the cervical spine. An incremental recruitment curve at the C7 vertebral level was initially performed to attain resting motor threshold (RMT) in each muscle. Paired pulses (1 ms square monophasic with inter-pulse interval of 50 ms) were subsequently delivered at a frequency of 0.25 Hz at two intensities (RMT and RMT + 20%) across all nine cathode positions. Evoked responses to the 1st (PRMR1) and 2nd (PRMR2) stimuli were recorded in four upper-limb muscles. RESULTS: A significant effect of the spinal level was observed in all muscles for PRMR1, with greater responses being recorded caudally. Contralateral stimulation significantly increased PRMR1 in Biceps Brachii (p < 0.05, F = 4.9, η2 = 0.29), Flexor Carpi Radialis (p < 0.05, F = 4.9, η2 = 0.28) and Abductor Pollicis Brevis (p < 0.01, F = 8.9, η2 = 0.89). Post-activation depression (PAD) was also significantly increased with contralateral stimulation in Biceps Brachii (p = 0.001, F = 9.3, η2 = 0.44), Triceps Brachii (p < 0.05, F = 5.4, η2 = 0.31) and Flexor Carpi Radialis (p < 0.001, F = 17.4, η2 = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: A level of unilateral motor pool selectivity may be attained by altering stimulus intensity and location during cervical tSCS. Optimising these parameters may improve the efficacy of this neuromodulation method in clinical cohorts.

Postural stability is a valid and meaningful disability metric in progressive MS with potential for use in neuroprotective therapy trials.

BACKGROUND: Balance impairment is observed in up to 70% of people with MS (pwMS) and worsens with disease progression. Posturography using a force platform is the current gold standard in the measurement of balance. However, posturography has not been adequately studied or widely accepted for use as a disability outcome measure for pwMS. Importantly, the recent emergence of both successful and failed neuroprotective therapy trials in progressive MS has emphasised the need for new disability outcome measures for people with progressive MS. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical validity, reliability and feasibility of posturography as a disability metric in progressive MS. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. We recruited 73 people with progressive MS (age 18-65 years, EDSS 3.5-6.0). Participants stood in the centre of a force platform, feet comfortably apart, under various conditions: (i) eyes open (EO), (ii) eyes closed (EC) - a single task, each lasting ninety seconds; and simultaneous EO with a cognitive test: (iii) N-Back, a three-minute test whereby participants were instructed to click the mouse when two identical letters were displayed consecutively on a screen, (iv) Sustained Attention Response Task, a five-minute test whereby participants were instructed to click the mouse for every number "1″ to "9″ except "3″ - i.e., dual-tasks. Additionally, we performed a battery of validated physical and cognitive outcome measures. Posturographic data was processed using Matlab. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. We used multiple linear regression modelling to determine whether significant univariate correlations between posturography and clinical metrics were independent of covariates that may influence the associations seen. A two-tailed significance level of 0.05 was used. RESULTS: Of 73 participants, mean age 52.4 (8.5) years, mean MS disease duration 13.8 (10.3) years, median EDSS 5.0 (IQR 4.0-6.0), 44 (60.4%) were female. EO-Path-Length independently predicted upper extremity function (9-Hole-Peg-Test) with a larger effect size (adjusted R2=20.0%, p = 0.001) than that for walking measures (Timed 25-Foot Walk, adjusted R2=1.6%, p = 0.01; Two-Minute Walk Test, adjusted R2=7.2%, p = 0.002), while controlling for age, disease duration, height, weight, and sex. The addition of EO-Mediolateral-Displacement to the MS Functional Composite (MSFC) created a four-component z-score that increased the variance explained for quality of life (QOL) by 62.1%. Postural stability was significantly lower with mediolateral vs anteroposterior direction of sway, removal of vision, increased body weight, male sex, and fampridine use. Postural stability improved during dual-tasks compared to EO single task. Posturography detected significant worsening of balance over a single prolonged stance. CONCLUSION: Postural stability independently predicted a wide range of clinical metrics including upper extremity function, walking ability, cognition and QOL, therefore establishing construct and concurrent validity as a disability outcome measure for people with progressive MS. Additionally, posturography is a quantitative, non-invasive, quick-and-easy-to-administer, and highly sensitive device, demonstrating its high feasibility for use as a time- and resource-efficient disability metric in neuroprotective therapy trials for progressive MS.

Multiscale entropy derived complexity index analysis demonstrates significant mediolateral sway in persons with multiple sclerosis compared to healthy controls.

Clinical assessment of Multiple Sclerosis relies heavily on the Expanded Disability Status Scale, a non-linear rating system based on physician assessment of disease progression and walking ability. This inherently makes this method both subjective and limited in repeatability. This study developed a technically derived outcome measure of posture to compare a cohort of Multiple Sclerosis and Control subjects during an Eyes-Open and Eyes-closed task. Analysing traditional sway parameters and a multiscale entropy derived complexity index of posturography showed a significant difference in medio-lateral sway between groups during the Eyes-Open condition. This technically derived outcome measure may be of clinical benefit in the longitudinal assessment of the functional impact of balance in MS cohorts and assist in the evaluation of pharmaceutical and rehabilitation interventions.