Unilateral Biportal Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminal Decompression and Discectomy: A Technical Note.

Background and Introduction: Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is a set of techniques and procedures that reduces the local tissue injury while achieving the same results through traditional open surgery. The techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and degenerative canal stenosis have evolved from tubular discectomy to endoscopic discectomy. This helps in preserving spine function. Good clinical outcomes have been reported with the use of an endoscope for degenerative lumbar disc disease. Objective: In this video abstract, we present a case lumbar foraminal stenosis in an elderly man that was treated successfully using unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery. (UBESS). Surgical Technique: A 70-year-old man presented with progressive neurogenic claudication and left L4 numbness and paresthesias. His claudication distance was 200 m. His MRI Lumbosacral spine showed severe left L4-5 foraminal stenosis due to a disc prolapse. The patient underwent a left-sided unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal decompression and discectomy at L4-5 successfully. Postoperative period was uneventful and the patient had significant relief in his symptoms. Postoperative MRI Lumbosacral spine showed no muscle damage with adequate decompression at left L4-5 level. Results: The patient had an uneventful recovery. Conclusion: Biportal percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy/decompression is an ideal alternative to the uniportal endoscopic and minimal invasive microsurgery for foraminal and paracentral disc herniations and lateral recess and foraminal stenosis.

Endoscopic Extreme Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Large Spacers: A Technical Note and Preliminary Report.

This report describes a novel endoscopic fusion technique performed with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) that is known as extreme transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (eXTLIF) and is performed with a large spacer. We also present the short-term results of this procedure. Previous studies reported that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) could achieve acceptable rates of fusion; therefore, it is often used for treating various degenerative lumbar diseases. Moreover, MIS-TLIF can be performed with a unilateral approach; hence, it is commonly performed with the UBE technique. The biportal endoscopic TLIF procedure is usually performed with a single spacer in the interbody space. It is important to insert the maximum amount of graft material into the preparation site via an autologous bone marrow transplant or any other suitable substance with spacer insertion. Because MIS-TLIF with UBE is performed in water, it might provide an inadequate environment for excellent fusion. Therefore, a modified method was used to increase the surface contact area and insert the maximum amount of bone material with a larger spacer. However, the use of a large spacer necessitates a larger spacer orifice. For this purpose, eXTLIF was performed, which inserts the spacer more laterally compared with the current TLIF position. We report the surgical method and short-term results, which have been satisfactory thus far. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):163-168.].

Water Dynamics in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Its Related Factors: An In Vivo Proportional Regression and Proficiency-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: Stable water dynamics during endoscopic spine surgery improves the surgeon's comfort and patient's outcomes. We aimed to measure the water dynamics during spinal surgery and identify the factors that facilitate stable water dynamics. METHODS: This open-label, prospective, proficiency-matched, in vivo study included patients with single-level degenerative spinal disease. After assessing their heights and balancing the matched instrument, we measured the irrigation fluid pressure in various situations. We performed multiple regression analysis based on odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and relationships (proficiency-matched) with possible instrumental and physical characteristics. The instrumental factors were the presence and length of a rigid cannulation, and the physical characteristics were body mass index (body mass index [BMI]), skin-to-dura depth, height (interaction with BMI), and body weight (interaction with BMI). RESULTS: Of the 36 patients, 29 were included. The mean pressure of the operation cavity was 16.66 ± 9.12 cm H2O (12.25 ± 6.71 mm Hg). Water pressure with the rigid cannulation (9.41 ± 2.94 cm H2O [6.92 ± 2.16 mm Hg]) was significantly lower than that without cannulation (23.43 ± 7.57 cm H2O [17.26 ± 5.57 mm Hg], P < 0.01). Water pressure correlated with cannular length (OR = -1.08, CI = -1.79, -0.37, P < 0.01) and BMI (OR = 0.56, CI = 0.12, 0.99, P < 0.01). BMI showed a proportional relationship (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During biportal endoscopy, we suggest maintaining water pressure between 4.41 cm H2O (2.41 mm Hg) and 31.00 cm H2O (22.83 mm Hg). Compared to physical characteristics, placement of the cannula and appropriate cannula length are important factors that affect water dynamics.

Modified far lateral endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has the disadvantage of the small cage size and by consequence risk for cage subsidence. We succeeded to insert a large oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) cage during biportal endoscopic TLIF. METHODS: Unilateral total facetectomy was performed to expose the exiting and traversing nerve roots. The distance between the exiting and traversing nerve roots was measured before OLIF cage insertion. We inserted an OLIF cage instead of a TLIF cage. CONCLUSION: We successfully performed modified far lateral biportal endoscopic TLIF using large OLIF cages. Modified far lateral biportal endoscopic TLIF is usually suitable for the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels.

Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results.

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive spine surgery can minimize damage to normal anatomical structures. Recently, fully endoscopic spine surgeries have been attempted for lumbar fusion surgery. In this study, the authors performed a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique as a minimally invasive surgery for lumbar fusion. The purpose of this study is to present the UBE technique of fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) and to analyze the clinical results. METHODS Patients who were to undergo single-level fusion surgery from L3-4 to L5-S1 were enrolled. Two channels (endoscopic portal and working portal) were used for endoscopic lumbar fusion surgery. All patients underwent follow-up for more than 12 months. Demographic characteristics, diagnosis, operative time, and estimated blood loss were evaluated. MRI was performed on postoperative Day 2. Clinical evaluations (visual analog scale [VAS] for the leg and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] scores) were performed preoperatively and during the follow-up period. RESULTS A total of 69 patients (24 men and 45 women) were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months. Postoperative MRI revealed optimal direct neural decompression after fully endoscopic fusion surgery. VAS and ODI scores significantly improved after the surgery. There was no postoperative neurological deterioration. CONCLUSIONS Fully endoscopic LIF using the UBE technique may represent an alternative minimally invasive LIF surgery for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Long-term follow-up and larger clinical studies are needed to validate the clinical and radiological results of this surgery.

Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Disk Herniation and Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Technical Note.

Background and Study Aims Endoscopic lumbar diskectomy through the interlaminar window is gaining recognition. Most of the literature describes these endoscopic procedures using specialized uniportal multichannel endoscopes. However, a single portal limits the motion of the instruments and obscures visualization of the operating field. To overcome this limitation, we propose a new technique that utilizes two portals to access the spinal canal. The biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression (BELD) technique uses two portals to treat difficult lumbar disk herniations and also lumbar spinal stenoses. Patients and Methods Seventeen patients were treated with BELD for 11 lumbar disk herniations and 6 lumbar spinal stenoses. Preoperative back and leg visual analog scale (VAS-B and VAS-L, respectively) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded and compared with corresponding values on final follow-up. Results There was an average follow-up of 14 months. For the disk herniation group, preoperative VAS-L (7.8750 ± 1.24) and ODI (51.73 ± 18.57) was significantly different from follow-up postoperative VAS-L (0.87 ± 0.64, p = 0.000) and ODI (9.37 ± 4.83, p = 0.001). For the stenosis group, preoperative VAS-B (6.17 ± 1.94), VAS-L(7.83 ± 1.47), and ODI (63.27 ± 7.67) were significantly different from follow-up postoperative values (2.5 ± 1.04, p = 0.022; 2.00 ± 1.67, p = 0.001; 24.00 ± 6.45, p = 0.000, respectively). One patient underwent revision microdiskectomy for incomplete decompression. Conclusions BELD can achieve a similar decompression effect as microdiskectomy and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression with a smaller incision than tubular diskectomy.