Leveraging Patient Engagement Through Collaboration for Improved Global Health Outcomes in Sarcoma.

In the dynamic landscape of oncology, collaborative efforts between the medical community and patient advocacy groups are pivotal in shaping standards of care and advancing research. Nowhere is this collaboration more evident than in sarcoma, a group of rare cancers posing unique challenges to diagnosis, management, and treatment, which profoundly affect patient outcomes. Here, we explore the vital role of patient-centric collaboration in improving global health outcomes in sarcoma, emphasizing the transformative power of collective action and shared expertise. Challenges in sarcoma care, including diagnostic complexities, disparities in access to care, and genomic tumor heterogeneity, underscore the urgent need for collaborative solutions. Initiatives like the Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) and The Life Raft Group (LRG) exemplify successful models of collaborative research and patient advocacy, driving advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and disease understanding. Stakeholders across disciplines are uniting to improve sarcoma care and outcomes through the development of clinical practice guidelines, continuous medical education, patient registries, virtual tumor boards, and consortium-driven research endeavors, all of which foster the growth of global collaborative groups. The success of these collaborative efforts serves as a model for other rare diseases, highlighting the potential of collective action to drive progress and innovation in health care.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients with Molecular Testing Exhibit Superior Survival Compared to Patients without Testing: Results from the Life Raft Group (LRG) Registry.

Mutational testing for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) patients remains underutilized. In this retrospective analysis, the target population (n = 1556) reported: 904 had molecular testing ("Tested") vs. 652 without testing ("Untested"). Overall survival (OS) was 14.7 vs. 12.7 years (p < 0.00001), in metastatic patients 1st line OS was 8.9 vs. 5.9 years in the Tested vs. Untested group (n = 416 vs. n = 254), respectively. From 1st - 3rd-line, no difference has been (self-)reported for progression-free survival (PFS). Dropout to/for further lines of treatment was 15% for patients with a Tested mutation vs. 47% in Untested patients.