Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children born with major congenital anomalies (CAs) have lower academic achievement compared with their peers, but the existing evidence is restricted to a number of specific CAs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate academic outcomes at ages 11 and 16 in children with major isolated structural CAs and children with Down or Turner syndromes. METHODS: This population-based cohort study linked data on approximately 11,000 school-aged children born with major CAs in 1994-2004 registered by four regional CA registries in England with education data from the National Pupil Database (NPD). The comparison group was a random sample of children without major CAs from the background population recorded in the NPD that were frequency matched (5:1) to children with CAs by birth year, sex and geographical area. RESULTS: Overall, 71.9%, 73.0% and 80.9% of children with isolated structural CAs achieved the expected attainment level at age 11 compared to 78.3%, 80.6% and 86.7% of the comparison group in English language, Mathematics and Science, respectively. Children with nervous system CAs as a whole had the lowest proportion who achieved the expected attainment at age 11. At age 16, 46.9% of children with CAs achieved the expected level compared to 52.5% of their peers. Major CAs were associated with being up to 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8%, 11%) and 12% (95% CI 9%, 14%) less likely to achieve expected levels at ages 11 and 16, respectively, after adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Although many children with isolated CAs achieved the expected academic level at ages 11 and 16, they were at higher risk of underachievement compared to their peers. These stark yet cautiously encouraging results are important for counselling parents of children with specific CAs and also highlight the possible need for special education support to reduce potential academic difficulties.

2.
Chest ; 152(1): 51-57, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27988237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite recent clinical guideline development, the best pathway of care for children with symptoms of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB) is still debated. This systematic review aims to map the research in childhood oSDB that has been conducted so far to support further guideline development, identify evidence gaps, and guide future research. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 26, 2015. All publications on childhood oSDB were included, irrespective of type and language. The annual number of publications in the field of oSDB was counted over all years; for those published since January 1, 2011 (ie, the date of the latest literature search of the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline), total and annual numbers of publications across main research themes and methodologies were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 7,637 unique records retrieved, 5,871 publications were eligible for inclusion. There was an increase in annual publications since 2000, with 46% published since 2011. Most publications (61%) focused on individual treatment modalities, incidence, or prognosis. Few publications (2.7%) focused on health service delivery, outcomes, and health economics. Observational studies composed 78.5% of publications, 2.4% were randomized controlled trials, and 0.4% used a qualitative approach as their main methodology. CONCLUSIONS: A recent surge in research activity into childhood oSDB has improved the knowledge base for this condition; however, the lack of health services, health economics, and outcomes research impacts the applicability of evidence informing current guidance and leaves important questions for future research. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: registration number CRD42015029291.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono , Criança , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Pesquisa , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/diagnóstico , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/terapia
3.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 21(4): 567-71, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25756499

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: There is evidence that health and well-being of the National Health Service (NHS) workforce affects organizational and patient outcomes. A Cochrane review of the effectiveness of clinical audit to improve quality of care has shown great variation between studies, depending on the design and intensity of support offered. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an organizational audit methodology with (1) action-planning workshops and follow-up and (2) audit feedback alone, to support the implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) workplace guidance. METHODS: Two rounds of audit using a self-administered online questionnaire were conducted. An overall implementation score was devised for each trust. Following round 1, interviews were conducted with a cohort of trusts with high scores. The interviews used a theory-based framework to identify predictors of and barriers to successful implementation. From this, the content for action-planning workshops was devised and workshops held with lower scoring trusts. The remaining trusts received only written feedback on their audit results. Changes in the implementation score between rounds 1 and 2 were compared within and between cohorts. RESULTS: The median improvement in scores between rounds 1 and 2 was statistically significant except where baseline score was high. The improvement for trusts who received workshops was very much better than those who did not (P < 0.001). This difference remained after adjustment using stratification by baseline score (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Audit, combined with action-planning workshops and follow-up, appears to be more effective in improving implementation of NICE workplace health and well-being guidance than audit with feedback alone.


Assuntos
Educação , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Guias como Assunto , Pessoal de Saúde , Saúde Ocupacional , Saúde Pública , Inglaterra , Retroalimentação , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Medicina Estatal , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care ; 34(1): 51-4, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18201408

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To measure agreement between the client's and the clinician's responses to questions regarding client history as answered on a questionnaire based on the UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC) for combined hormonal contraception (CHC). METHODS: Clients aged 18 years and over, attending a central London community contraceptive clinic requesting a repeat supply of CHC, completed a history questionnaire and an evaluation form. Clinicians then completed their copy of the same questionnaire during the consultation. Percentage agreement and the Kappa statistic were used to assess the level of client-clinician agreement. RESULTS: Data from 328 client-clinician pairs were analysed. Agreement was above 93% for all identified risk factors. There was complete agreement for thrombosis, diabetes, stroke, cancer and liver problems. Least agreement was noted in the recording of migraine and abnormal bleeding. For all risk factors except smoking, the proportion of clients reporting a risk factor was more than the proportion of clinicians reporting a risk factor. No clinically important information relevant to a particular client's use of CHC was missed and none of them would have been wrongly prescribed the CHC based just on their self-completed questionnaires. Most women (97%) were happy with this method of history taking. CONCLUSIONS: A self-completed history questionnaire is acceptable to women and can potentially replace traditional routine medical history taking for continuing CHC. Women completed the questionnaire with a high degree of reliability. There was complete client-clinician agreement on UKMEC Category 4 criteria. Overall, clients reported more risk factors than clinicians, which increases the safety of the questionnaire.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais Combinados , Anamnese/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Londres , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 46(4): 625-33, 2008 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18190281

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) remains the leading cause of opportunistic infection among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons. Previous studies of PCP that identified case-fatality risk factors involved small numbers of patients, were performed over few years, and often focused on patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify case-fatality risk factors present at or soon after hospitalization among adult HIV-infected patients admitted to University College London Hospitals (London, United Kingdom) from June 1985 through June 2006. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a review of case notes for 494 consecutive patients with 547 episodes of laboratory-confirmed PCP. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 13.5%. Mortality was 10.1% for the period from 1985 through 1989, 16.9% for the period from 1990 through June 1996, and 9.7% for the period from July 1996 through 2006 (P = .142). Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with risk of death, including increasing patient age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.23; P = .011), subsequent episode of PCP (AOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.14-4.52; P = .019), low hemoglobin level at hospital admission (AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.83; P < .001), low partial pressure of oxygen breathing room air at hospital admission (AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.81; P < .001), presence of medical comorbidity (AOR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.77-8.72; P = .001), and pulmonary Kaposi sarcoma (AOR, 6.95; 95% CI, 2.26-21.37; P = .001). Patients with a first episode of PCP were sicker (mean partial pressure of oxygen at admission +/- standard deviation, 9.3+/-2.0 kPa) than those with a second or third episode of PCP (mean partial pressure of oxygen at admission +/- standard deviation, 9.9+/-1.9 kPa; P = .008), but mortality among patients with a first episode of PCP (12.5%) was lower than mortality among patients with subsequent episodes of PCP (22.5%) (P = .019). No patient was receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy before presentation with PCP, and none began highly active antiretroviral therapy during treatment of PCP. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality risk factors for PCP were identifiable at or soon after hospitalization. The trend towards improved outcome after June 1996 occurred in the absence of highly active antiretroviral therapy.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/complicações , Pneumocystis carinii/isolamento & purificação , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...