High-grade neuroendocrine head and neck cancer: Case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: High-grade neuroendocrine cancers (NEC) of the head and neck (HN) are rare and aggressive, accounting for ≤1 % of all HN cancers, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of ≤20 %. This case series examines clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients diagnosed at a regional UK HN cancer centre over the last 23 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for all patients diagnosed with NEC HN from 1st January 2000 until 1st March 2023 at Velindre Cancer Centre. RESULTS: During the study period, 19 cases of NEC HN were identified, primarily affecting males (n = 15, 79 %). Median age of 67 years (range: 44-86). At diagnosis, 32 % of patients (n = 6) were smokers. The most common primary tumour sites were larynx (n = 5, 26.3 %) and sinonasal (n = 5, 26.3 %). Most patients presented with advanced loco-regional disease or distant metastasis, with stage IVA (n = 6, 32 %) and stage IVC (n = 6, 32 %) being the most common. The key pathology marker was synaptophysin, present in 100 % of the tested patients (n = 15). In the study, of the 12 patients with non-metastatic disease, 10 received a combination of treatments that included radiotherapy (RT). Some of these patients also received chemotherapy (CT) at the same time as their radiotherapy. Surgery alone was used in two patients with stage II disease. Seven subjects had complete responses, and one achieved a partial response. Among the seven metastatic patients, three received CT, and one underwent palliative RT, all achieving a partial response. In all cases, the CT used was carboplatin and etoposide. After a median follow-up of 11 months (range: 1-96), the median OS was 27 months for the overall population, 51 months for those treated radically, and three months for metastatic patients with palliative treatment. The 1-year OS for all patients was 54.3 %, the 2-year OS was 46.5 %, and the 5-year OS was 23.3 %. Among patients treated radically, these rates were 65.3 %, 52.2 %, and 26.1 %, respectively. For patients treated palliatively, the 1-year OS was 33.3 %. CONCLUSION: This case series contributes preliminary observations on the characteristics and management of non-metastatic NEC HN, suggesting potential benefits from multimodality treatment strategies. Given the small cohort size, these observations should be interpreted cautiously and seen as a foundation for further research.

Randomized Phase 3 Trial of the Hypoxia Modifier Nimorazole Added to Radiation Therapy With Benefit Assessed in Hypoxic Head and Neck Cancers Determined Using a Gene Signature (NIMRAD).

PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia is an adverse prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We assessed whether patients with hypoxic HNSCC benefited from the addition of nimorazole to definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: NIMRAD was a phase 3, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-anonymized trial of patients with HNSCC unsuitable for concurrent platinum chemotherapy or cetuximab with definitive IMRT (NCT01950689). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive IMRT (65 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) plus nimorazole (1.2 g/m2 daily, before IMRT) or placebo. The primary endpoint was freedom from locoregional progression (FFLRP) in patients with hypoxic tumors, defined as greater than or equal to the median tumor hypoxia score of the first 50 patients analyzed (≥0.079), using a validated 26-gene signature. The planned sample size was 340 patients, allowing for signature generation in 85% and an assumed hazard ratio (HR) of 0.50 for nimorazole effectiveness in the hypoxic group and requiring 66 locoregional failures to have 80% power in a 2-tail log-rank test at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized by 19 centers in the United Kingdom from May 2014 to May 2019, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (95% CI, 2.9-3.4). Hypoxia scores were available for 286 (85%). The median patient age was 73 years (range, 44-88; IQR, 70-76). There were 36 (25.9%) locoregional failures in the hypoxic group, in which nimorazole + IMRT did not improve FFLRP (adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.36-1.44; P = .35) or overall survival (adjusted HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.53-1.72; P = .88) compared with placebo + IMRT. Similarly, nimorazole + IMRT did not improve FFLRP or overall survival in the whole population. In total (N = 338), 73% of patients allocated nimorazole adhered to the drug for ≥50% of IMRT fractions. Nimorazole + IMRT caused more acute nausea compared with placebo + IMRT (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 G1+2: 56.6% vs 42.4%, G3: 10.1% vs 5.3%, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of the hypoxia modifier nimorazole to IMRT for locally advanced HNSCC in older and less fit patients did not improve locoregional control or survival.

Whole blood-based measurement of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells reveals asymptomatic infection and vaccine immunogenicity in healthy subjects and patients with solid-organ cancers.

Accurate assessment of SARS-CoV-2 immunity is critical in evaluating vaccine efficacy and devising public health policies. Whilst the exact nature of effective immunity remains incompletely defined, SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses are a critical feature that will likely form a key correlate of protection against COVID-19. Here, we developed and optimized a high-throughput whole blood-based assay to determine the T-cell response associated with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination amongst 231 healthy donors and 68 cancer patients. Following overnight in vitro stimulation with SARS-CoV-2-specific peptides, blood plasma samples were analysed for TH 1-type cytokines. Highly significant differential IFN-γ+ /IL-2+ SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were seen amongst previously infected COVID-19-positive healthy donors in comparison with unknown / naïve individuals (p < 0·0001). IFN-γ production was more effective at identifying asymptomatic donors, demonstrating higher sensitivity (96·0% vs. 83·3%) but lower specificity (84·4% vs. 92·5%) than measurement of IL-2. A single COVID-19 vaccine dose induced IFN-γ and/or IL-2 SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses in 116 of 128 (90·6%) healthy donors, reducing significantly to 27 of 56 (48·2%) when measured in cancer patients (p < 0·0001). A second dose was sufficient to boost T-cell responses in the majority (90·6%) of cancer patients, albeit IFN-γ+ responses were still significantly lower overall than those induced in healthy donors (p = 0·034). Three-month post-vaccination T-cell responses also declined at a faster rate in cancer patients. Overall, this cost-effective standardizable test ensures accurate and comparable assessments of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses amenable to widespread population immunity testing, and identifies individuals at greater need of booster vaccinations.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiotherapy services in England, UK: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer outcomes is of increasing concern. However, the extent to which key treatment modalities have been affected is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on radiotherapy activity in England. METHODS: In this population-based study, data relating to all radiotherapy delivered for cancer in the English NHS, between Feb 4, 2019, and June 28, 2020, were extracted from the National Radiotherapy Dataset. Changes in mean weekly radiotherapy courses, attendances (reflecting fractions), and fractionation patterns following the start of the UK lockdown were compared with corresponding months in 2019 overall, for specific diagnoses, and across age groups. The significance of changes in radiotherapy activity during lockdown was examined using interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis. FINDINGS: In 2020, mean weekly radiotherapy courses fell by 19·9% in April, 6·2% in May, and 11·6% in June compared with corresponding months in 2019. A relatively greater fall was observed for attendances (29·1% in April, 31·4% in May, and 31·5% in June). These changes were significant on ITS analysis (p<0·0001). A greater reduction in treatment courses between 2019 and 2020 was seen for patients aged 70 years or older compared with those aged younger than 70 years (34·4% vs 7·3% in April). By diagnosis, the largest reduction from 2019 to 2020 in treatment courses was for prostate cancer (77·0% in April) and non-melanoma skin cancer (72·4% in April). Conversely, radiotherapy courses in April, 2020, compared with April, 2019, increased by 41·2% in oesophageal cancer, 64·2% in bladder cancer, and 36·3% in rectal cancer. Increased use of ultra-hypofractionated (26 Gy in five fractions) breast radiotherapy as a percentage of all courses (0·2% in April, 2019, to 60·6% in April, 2020; ITS p<0·0001) contributed to the substantial reduction in attendances. INTERPRETATION: Radiotherapy activity fell significantly, but use of hypofractionated regimens rapidly increased in the English NHS during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. An increase in treatments for some cancers suggests that radiotherapy compensated for reduced surgical activity. These data will assist health-care providers in understanding the indirect consequences of the pandemic and the role of radiotherapy services in minimising these consequences. FUNDING: None.

Sensitivity of human papillomavirus­positive and ­negative oropharyngeal cancer cell lines to ionizing irradiation.

Human papillomavirus­positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased in incidence and has a much better prognosis than HPV­negative (HPV­) OPSCC with radiotherapy alone, but exactly why is unknown. The present study therefore aimed to further examine the sensitivity and possible changes in gene expression of several HPV+ and HPV­ OPSCC, including various novel cell lines, upon ionizing irradiation (IR). Previously established HPV+ UM­SCC­47, UPCI­SCC­90, CU­OP­2, CU­OP­3 and HPV­ UM­SCC­4, UM­SCC­6, UM­SCC­74a, UM­SCC­19 and newly established CU­OP­17 and CU­OP­20, characterised here, were subjected to 0­6 Gy. Surviving fractions of each cell line were tested by clonogenic assays, and irregularities in cell cycle responses were examined by flow cytometry, while changes in gene expression were followed by mRNA sequencing. HPV+ OPSCC cell lines showed greater variation in sensitivity to ionizing irradiation (IR) and tended to be more sensitive than HPV­ OPSCC cell lines. However, their IR sensitivity was not correlated to the proportion of cells in G2 arrest, and HPV­ cell lines generally showed lower increases in G2 after IR. Upon IR with 2 Gy, mRNA sequencing revealed an increase in minor HPV integration sites in HPV+ cell lines, and some changes in gene expression in OPSCC cell lines, but not primarily those associated with DNA repair. To conclude, HPV+ OPSCC cell lines showed greater variation in their sensitivity to IR, with some that were radioresistant, but overall the HPV+ OPSCC group still tended to be more sensitive to IR than the HPV­ OPSCC group. In addition, HPV+ OPSCC lines were more frequently in G2 as compared to HPV­ cell lines, but the increase in G2 arrest upon IR in HPV+ OPSCC was not correlated to sensitivity to IR. Increases in minor HPV integration sites and changes in gene expression were also demonstrated after irradiation with 2 Gy.

Practice recommendations for risk-adapted head and neck cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: An ASTRO-ESTRO consensus statement.

PURPOSE: Because of the unprecedented disruption of health care services caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) identified an urgent need to issue practice recommendations for radiation oncologists treating head and neck cancer (HNC) in a time of limited resources and heightened risk for patients and staff. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A panel of international experts from ASTRO, ESTRO, and select Asia-Pacific countries completed a modified rapid Delphi process. Topics and questions were presented to the group, and subsequent questions were developed from iterative feedback. Each survey was open online for 24 hours, and successive rounds started within 24 hours of the previous round. The chosen cutoffs for strong agreement (≥80%) and agreement (≥66%) were extrapolated from the RAND methodology. Two pandemic scenarios, early (risk mitigation) and late (severely reduced radiation therapy resources), were evaluated. The panel developed treatment recommendations for 5 HNC cases. RESULTS: In total, 29 of 31 of those invited (94%) accepted, and after a replacement 30 of 30 completed all 3 surveys (100% response rate). There was agreement or strong agreement across a number of practice areas, including treatment prioritization, whether to delay initiation or interrupt radiation therapy for intercurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection, approaches to treatment (radiation dose-fractionation schedules and use of chemotherapy in each pandemic scenario), management of surgical cases in event of operating room closures, and recommended adjustments to outpatient clinic appointments and supportive care. CONCLUSIONS: This urgent practice recommendation was issued in the knowledge of the very difficult circumstances in which our patients find themselves at present, navigating strained health care systems functioning with limited resources and at heightened risk to their health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this consensus statement is to ensure high-quality HNC treatments continue, to save lives and for symptomatic benefit.

Practice Recommendations for Risk-Adapted Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An ASTRO-ESTRO Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: Because of the unprecedented disruption of health care services caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) identified an urgent need to issue practice recommendations for radiation oncologists treating head and neck cancer (HNC) in a time of limited resources and heightened risk for patients and staff. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A panel of international experts from ASTRO, ESTRO, and select Asia-Pacific countries completed a modified rapid Delphi process. Topics and questions were presented to the group, and subsequent questions were developed from iterative feedback. Each survey was open online for 24 hours, and successive rounds started within 24 hours of the previous round. The chosen cutoffs for strong agreement (≥80%) and agreement (≥66%) were extrapolated from the RAND methodology. Two pandemic scenarios, early (risk mitigation) and late (severely reduced radiation therapy resources), were evaluated. The panel developed treatment recommendations for 5 HNC cases. RESULTS: In total, 29 of 31 of those invited (94%) accepted, and after a replacement 30 of 30 completed all 3 surveys (100% response rate). There was agreement or strong agreement across a number of practice areas, including treatment prioritization, whether to delay initiation or interrupt radiation therapy for intercurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection, approaches to treatment (radiation dose-fractionation schedules and use of chemotherapy in each pandemic scenario), management of surgical cases in event of operating room closures, and recommended adjustments to outpatient clinic appointments and supportive care. CONCLUSIONS: This urgent practice recommendation was issued in the knowledge of the very difficult circumstances in which our patients find themselves at present, navigating strained health care systems functioning with limited resources and at heightened risk to their health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this consensus statement is to ensure high-quality HNC treatments continue, to save lives and for symptomatic benefit.

Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The impact of radiotherapy (RT) quality assurance (QA) has been demonstrated by numerous studies and is particularly important for head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment due to the complexity of RT target volumes in this region and the multiple adjacent organs at risk. The RT planning process includes many critical steps including interpretation of diagnostic imaging, image fusion, target volume delineation (tumor, lymph nodes, and organs at risk), and planning. Each step has become highly complex, and precise and rigorous QA throughout the planning process is essential. The ultimate aim is to precisely deliver radiation dose to the target, maximizing the tumor dose and minimizing the dose to surrounding organs at risk, in order to improve the therapeutic index. It is imperative that RT QA programs should systematically control all aspects of the RT planning pathway and include regular end-to-end tests and external audits. However, comprehensive QA should not be limited to RT and should, where possible, also be implemented for surgery, systemic therapy, pathology, as well as other aspects involved in the interdisciplinary treatment of HNC.

Organ Preservation and Late Functional Outcome in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Rationale of EORTC 1420, the "Best of" Trial.

Dysphagia represents one of the most serious adverse events after curative-intent treatments with a tremendous impact on quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers. Novel surgical and radiation therapy techniques have been developed to better preserve swallowing function, while not negatively influencing local control and/or overall survival. This review focuses on the current literature of swallowing outcomes after curative treatment strategies. Available results from recent studies relevant to this topic are presented, demonstrating the potential role of new treatment modalities for early- and intermediate-stage oropharyngeal cancers. Based on this, we present the rationale and design of the currently active EORTC 1420 "Best of" trial, and highlight the potential of this study to help prioritizing either surgery- or radiation-based treatment modalities for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer in the future.

Deintensification of Adjuvant Treatment After Transoral Surgery in Patients With Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Conception of the PATHOS Study and Its Development.

PATHOS is a phase II/III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of risk-stratified, reduced intensity adjuvant treatment in patients undergoing transoral surgery (TOS) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The study opened in the UK in October 2015 and, after successful recruitment into the phase II, transitioned into phase III in the autumn of 2018. PATHOS aims to establish whether the de-intensification of adjuvant treatment in patients with favorable prognosis HPV-positive OPSCC will confer improved swallowing outcomes, whilst maintaining high rates of cure. In this article, we will outline the rationale for the study and how it aims to answer fundamentally important questions about the safety, effectiveness and functional outcomes of minimally invasive TOS techniques followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in this patient population.

Machine-learned target volume delineation of 18F-FDG PET images after one cycle of induction chemotherapy.

Biological tumour volume (GTVPET) delineation on 18F-FDG PET acquired during induction chemotherapy (ICT) is challenging due to the reduced metabolic uptake and volume of the GTVPET. Automatic segmentation algorithms applied to 18F-FDG PET (PET-AS) imaging have been used for GTVPET delineation on 18F-FDG PET imaging acquired before ICT. However, their role has not been investigated in 18F-FDG PET imaging acquired after ICT. In this study we investigate PET-AS techniques, including ATLAAS a machine learned method, for accurate delineation of the GTVPET after ICT. Twenty patients were enrolled onto a prospective phase I study (FiGaRO). PET/CT imaging was acquired at baseline and 3 weeks following 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy. The GTVPET was manually delineated by a nuclear medicine physician and clinical oncologist. The resulting GTVPET was used as the reference contour. The ATLAAS original statistical model was expanded to include images of reduced metabolic activity and the ATLAAS algorithm was re-trained on the new reference dataset. Estimated GTVPET contours were derived using sixteen PET-AS methods and compared to the GTVPET using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). The mean DSC for ATLAAS, 60% Peak Thresholding (PT60), Adaptive Thresholding (AT) and Watershed Thresholding (WT) was 0.72, 0.61, 0.63 and 0.60 respectively. The GTVPET generated by ATLAAS compared favourably with manually delineated volumes and in comparison, to other PET-AS methods, was more accurate for GTVPET delineation after ICT. ATLAAS would be a feasible method to reduce inter-observer variability in multi-centre trials.

A systematic review of dose-volume predictors and constraints for late bowel toxicity following pelvic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Advanced pelvic radiotherapy techniques aim to reduce late bowel toxicity which can severely impact the lives of pelvic cancer survivors. Although advanced techniques have been largely adopted worldwide, to achieve their aim, knowledge of which dose-volume parameters of which components of bowel predict late bowel toxicity is crucial to make best use of these techniques. The rectum is an extensively studied organ at risk (OAR), and dose-volume predictors of late toxicity for the rectum are established. However, for other components of bowel, there is a significant paucity of knowledge. The Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) reviews recommend dose-volume constraints for acute bowel toxicity for peritoneal cavity and bowel loops, although no constraints are recommended for late toxicity, despite its relevance to our increasing number of survivors. This systematic review aims to examine the published literature to seek dose-volume predictors and constraints of late bowel toxicity for OARs (apart from the rectum) for use in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cinahl and Pubmed. Studies were screened and included according to specific pre-defined criteria. Included studies were assessed for quality against QUANTEC-defined assessment criteria. RESULTS: 101 studies were screened to find 30 relevant studies. Eight studies related to whole bowel, 11 to small bowel, and 21 to large bowel (including 16 of the anal canal). The anal canal is an important OAR for the development of late toxicity, and we recommend an anal canal Dmean <40Gy as a constraint to reduce late incontinence. For other components of bowel (sigmoid, large bowel, intestinal cavity, bowel loops), although individual studies found statistically significant parameters and constraints these findings were not corroborated in other studies. CONCLUSIONS: The anal canal is an important OAR for the development of late bowel toxicity symptoms. Further validation of the constraints found for other components of bowel is needed. Studies that were more conclusive included those with patient-reported data, where individual symptom scores were assessed rather than an overall score, and those that followed statistical and endpoint criteria as defined by QUANTEC.

Sensitivity to inhibition of DNA repair by Olaparib in novel oropharyngeal cancer cell lines infected with Human Papillomavirus.

The incidence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing rapidly in the UK. Patients with HPV-positive OPSCC generally show superior clinical responses relative to HPV-negative patients. We hypothesised that these superior responses could be associated with defective repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB). The study aimed to determine whether defective DNA repair could be associated with sensitivity to inhibition of DNA repair using the PARP inhibitor Olaparib. Sensitivity to Olaparib, and induction and repair of DNA damage, were assessed in a panel of 8 OPSCC cell-lines, including 2 novel HPV-positive lines. Effects on cell cycle distribution and levels of PARP1 and p53 were quantified. RNA-sequencing was used to assess differences in activity of DNA repair pathways. Two HPV-positive OPSCC lines were sensitive to Olaparib at potentially therapeutic doses (0.1-0.5 µM). Two HPV-negative lines were sensitive at an intermediate dose. Four other lines, derived from HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumours, were resistant to PARP inhibition. Only one cell-line, UPCISCC90, showed results consistent with the original hypothesis i.e. that in HPV-positive cells, treatment with Olaparib would cause accumulation of DSB, resulting in cell cycle arrest. There was no evidence that HPV-positive tumours exhibit defective repair of DSB. However, the data suggest that a subset of OPSCC may be susceptible to PARP-inhibitor based therapy.

Target delineation for postoperative treatment of head and neck cancer.

Patients who undergo primary surgical resection for a Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) are stratified post-operatively, based on the presence or absence of pathological risk factors for recurrence, to estimate their risk of treatment failure. Post-operative radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy, is offered if there is a significant risk of recurrence, in order to eradicate potential microscopic residual cancer cells and ultimately improve loco-regional control and survival. This review will offer practical guidelines for delineation of the post-operative primary and nodal Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) based on a geometric expansion of the pre-operative primary and nodal Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs), as already implemented in the definitive radiotherapy setting. Nodal levels requiring elective treatment are defined for inclusion in the prophylactic CTV. Optimising patient selection for post-operative treatment is discussed as well as areas of controversy, relating to the dose prescription and extent of nodal volumes to be included in the CTV. Finally, clinical trials exploring the prospect of adjuvant treatment de-intensification after transoral surgery for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer are outlined. The aim is to improve consensus amongst clinicians and contribute towards improving outcomes for surgically treated patients with HNSCC.

Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of cochlear-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with parotid cancer (COSTAR; CRUK/08/004).

PURPOSE: About 40-60% of patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy for parotid cancer experience ipsilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce radiation dose to the cochlea. COSTAR, a phase III trial, investigated the role of cochlear-sparing IMRT (CS-IMRT) in reducing hearing loss. METHODS: Patients (pT1-4 N0-3 M0) were randomly assigned (1:1) to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or CS-IMRT by minimisation, balancing for centre and radiation dose of 60Gy or 65Gy in 30 daily fractions. The primary end-point was proportion of patients with sensorineural hearing loss in the ipsilateral cochlea of ≥10 dB bone conduction at 4000 Hz 12 months after radiotherapy compared using Fisher's exact test. Secondary end-points included hearing loss at 6 and 24 months, balance assessment, acute and late toxicity, patient-reported quality of life, time to recurrence and survival. RESULTS: From Aug 2008 to Feb 2013, 110 patients (54 3DCRT; 56 CS-IMRT) were enrolled from 22 UK centres. Median doses to the ipsilateral cochlea were 3DCRT: 56.2Gy and CS-IMRT: 35.7Gy (p < 0.0001). 67/110 (61%) patients were evaluable for the primary end-point; main reasons for non-evaluability were non-attendance at follow-up or incomplete audiology assessment. At 12 months, 14/36 (39%) 3DCRT and 11/31 (36%) CS-IMRT patients had ≥10 dB loss (p = 0.81). No statistically significant differences were observed in hearing loss at 6 or 24 months or in other secondary end-points including patient-reported hearing outcomes. CONCLUSION: CS-IMRT reduced the radiation dose below the accepted tolerance of the cochlea, but this did not lead to a reduction in the proportion of patients with clinically relevant hearing loss.

Delineation of the primary tumour Clinical Target Volumes (CTV-P) in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: AIRO, CACA, DAHANCA, EORTC, GEORCC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, HNCIG, IAG-KHT, LPRHHT, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology, PHNS, SBRT, SOMERA, SRO, SSHNO, TROG consensus guidelines.

PURPOSE: Few studies have reported large inter-observer variations in target volume selection and delineation in patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Consensus guidelines have been published for the neck nodes (see Grégoire et al., 2003, 2014), but such recommendations are lacking for primary tumour delineation. For the latter, two main schools of thoughts are prevailing, one based on geometric expansion of the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) as promoted by DAHANCA, and the other one based on anatomical expansion of the GTV using compartmentalization of head and neck anatomy. METHOD: For each anatomic location within the larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx and oral cavity, and for each T-stage, the DAHANCA proposal has been comprehensively reviewed and edited to include anatomic knowledge into the geometric Clinical Target Volume (CTV) delineation concept. A first proposal was put forward by the leading authors of this publication (VG and CG) and discussed with opinion leaders in head and neck radiation oncology from Europe, Asia, Australia/New Zealand, North America and South America to reach a worldwide consensus. RESULTS: This consensus proposes two CTVs for the primary tumour, the so called CTV-P1 and CVT-P2, corresponding to a high and lower tumour burden, and which should be associated with a high and a lower dose prescription, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implementation of these guidelines in the daily practice of radiation oncology should contribute to reduce treatment variations from clinicians to clinicians, facilitate the conduct of multi-institutional clinical trials, and contribute to improved care of patients with head and neck carcinoma.

Talking about human papillomavirus and cancer: development of consultation guides through lay and professional stakeholder coproduction using qualitative, quantitative and secondary data.

BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) cause all cervical cancer and the majority of vulvar, vaginal, anal, penile and oropharyngeal cancers. Although HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection, public awareness of this is poor. In addition, many clinicians lack adequate knowledge or confidence to discuss sexual transmission and related sensitive issues. Complex science needs to be communicated in a clear, digestible, honest and salient way. Therefore, the aim of this study was to coproduce with patients who have cancer appropriate resources to guide these highly sensitive and difficult consultations. METHODS: A matrix of evidence developed from a variety of sources, including a systematic review and telephone interviews with clinicians, supported the production of a draft list of approximately 100 potential educational messages. These were refined in face-to-face patient interviews using card-sorting techniques, and tested in cognitive debrief interviews to produce a â€Ëœfast and frugal’ knowledge tool. RESULTS: We developed three versions of a consultation guide, each comprising a clinician guidance sheet and patient information leaflet for gynaecological (cervical, vaginal, vulvar), anal or oropharyngeal cancers. That cancer could be caused by a sexually transmitted virus acquired many years previously was surprising to many and shocking to a few patients. However, they found the information clear, helpful and reassuring. Clinicians acknowledged a lack of confidence in explaining HPV, welcomed the clinician guidance sheets and considered printed information for patients particularly useful. CONCLUSION: Because of the â€Ëœshock factor’, clinicians will need to approach the discussion of HPV with sensitivity and take individual needs and preferences into account, but we provide a novel, rigorously developed and tested resource which should have broad applicability in the UK National Health Service and other health systems.