Health Disparities Among Hispanics With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Delay in Presentation to Rheumatologists Contributes to Later Diagnosis and Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate referral and treatment delays by ethnicity/race in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated at an academic rheumatology center. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all RA patients evaluated at an outpatient clinic between 2011 and 2016 to identify newly diagnosed and naive-to-treatment patients. We determined the durations between symptom onset and first rheumatology visit and time to initiate treatment. Data extraction included referral source, demographics, treatment, and laboratory tests. Routine use of a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire allowed us to calculate baseline RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data 3) scores. Comparisons between self-reported ethnicity/race groups were performed. We used logistic regression models to analyze associations between baseline variables and early referral. RESULTS: Data from 152 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive RA patients were included in the study; 35% were white, 37% black, 20% Hispanic, and 8% other. The range in median time to first rheumatology visit was 6 to 8 months for all patient groups, except Hispanic. This group had a median time of 22.7 months (p = 0.01). The referral pattern was considerably variable between-groups; 40% of Hispanic patients were self-referred (p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant between-group differences for time to treatment initiation according to ethnicity/race. RAPID3 scores (p = 0.04) and erythrocyte sedimentation rates (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the black and Hispanic groups. A high C-reactive protein value at baseline was associated with earlier referral. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant delay in initial presentation to a rheumatologist that was associated with a higher disease severity at presentation, especially for Hispanic patients.

RheuMetric A Physician Checklist to Record Patient Levels of Inflammation, Damage and Distress as Quantitative Data Rather than as Narrative Impressions.

BACKGROUND: A physician global estimate of patient status (DOCGL) was designed to quantitate inflammatory activity but may be influenced by the presence of damage and distress. Therefore, three additional 0 to 10 visual analog scales (VAS) have been developed on a RheuMetric checklist to record physician estimates of inflammation (DOCINF), damage (DOCDAM), and distress (DOCSTR) (such as fibromyalgia and somatization). We analyzed patient scores on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and four RheuMetric physician estimates inpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoarthritis (OA), and fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: All patients with all diagnoses seen by Rush University Medical Center rheumatologists complete an MDHAQ and have four RheuMetric 0 to 10 VAS estimates for DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCSTR assigned by the rheumatologist at each visit. A random visit of 205 patients with RA (N = 50), OA (N = 67), SLE (N = 66), and FM (N = 32) was analyzed for mean MDHAQ scores, RheuMetric estimates, and Spearman correlations. RESULTS: Mean MDHAQ scores and DOCGL were highest for FM, followed by OA, RA, and SLE. Highest estimates and highest correlations with DOCGL were seen for DOCINF in RA, for DOCDAM in OA, and for DOCSTR in FM. DOCDAM estimates were higher than DOCINF in RA and SLE, suggesting that damage may be as severe a clinical problem as inflammation. DOCGL was correlated significantly with patient global estimate (PATGL) in RA, SLE, and OA, but not in FM. CONCLUSIONS: Physician estimates for inflammation, damage,and distress differ in different rheumatic diagnoses. Many patients have inflammation and damage or distress, or all three problems, reflecting challenges of rheumatology care.