The psychological impact of gestational trophoblastic disease: a prospective observational multicentre cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term psychological consequences of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). DESIGN: A prospective observational multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide in the Netherlands. POPULATION: GTD patients. METHODS: Online questionnaires directly after diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Distress Thermometer (DT), Impact of Event Scale (IES) and Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS). RESULTS: Sixty GTD patients were included between 2017 and 2020. Anxious feelings (47%) were more commonly expressed than depressive feelings (27%). Patients experienced moderate to severe adaptation problems in 88%. Patients who already had children were less concerned about their reproductivity than were patients without children (mean score 10.4 versus 15.0, P = 0.031), and patients with children experienced lower distress levels (IES mean score 25.7 versus 34.7, P = 0.020). In addition, patients with previous pregnancy loss scored lower for distress compared with patients without pregnancy loss (IES mean score 21.1 versus 34.2, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: We recommend that physicians monitor physical complaints and the course of psychological wellbeing over time in order to provide personalised supportive care in time for patients who have high levels of distress at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: GTD patients experience increased levels of distress, anxiety and depression, suggesting the diagnosis has a substantial effect on the psychological wellbeing of patients. The impact of GTD diagnosis on intrusion and avoidance seems to be ameliorated in patients who have children or who have experienced previous pregnancy loss. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Patients with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) experience short-term psychological consequences such as distress, anxiety and depression, suggesting that the diagnosis GTD has a substantial effect on the psychological wellbeing of patients. Various patient characteristics affect the impact of GTD diagnosis.

Can the FIGO 2000 scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia be simplified? A new retrospective analysis from a nationwide dataset.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide introduction of the International Fedaration of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2000 scoring system has provided an effective means to stratify patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia to single- or multi-agent chemotherapy. However, the system is quite elaborate with an extensive set of risk factors. In this study, we re-evaluate all prognostic risk factors involved in the FIGO 2000 scoring system and examine if simplification is feasible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2012, 813 patients diagnosed with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were identified at the Trophoblastic Disease Centre in London and scored using the FIGO 2000. Multivariable analysis and stepwise logistic regression were carried out to evaluate whether the FIGO 2000 scoring system could be simplified. RESULTS: Of the eight FIGO risk factors only pre-treatment serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels exceeding 10 000 IU/l (OR = 5.0; 95% CI 2.5-10.4) and 100 000 IU/l (OR = 14.3; 95% CI 4.7-44.1), interval exceeding 7 months since antecedent pregnancy (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.0-16.2), and tumor size of over 5 cm (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.6) were identified as independently predictive for single-agent resistance. In addition, increased risk was apparent for antecedent term pregnancy (OR = 3.4; 95% CI 0.9-12.7) and the presence of five or more metastases (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 0.4-30.4), but patient numbers in these categories were relatively small. Stepwise logistic regression identified a simplified risk scoring model comprising age, pretreatment serum hCG, number of metastases, antecedent pregnancy, and interval but omitting tumor size, previous failed chemotherapy, and site of metastases. With this model only 1 out 725 patients was classified different from the FIGO 2000 system. CONCLUSION: Our simplified alternative using only five of the FIGO prognostic factors appears to be an accurate system for discriminating patients requiring single as opposed to multi-agent chemotherapy. Further work is urgently needed to validate these findings.

The added value of hysterectomy in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Despite the undoubted effectiveness of chemotherapeutic treatment in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), problems related to toxicity of chemotherapy and chemo-resistant disease have led to reconsideration of the use of hysterectomy. Aim of the present study was to evaluate indications for and outcome of hysterectomy in patients with GTN in a nation-wide cohort. METHODS: Between 1977 and 2012, we identified all patients diagnosed with GTN and treated with hysterectomy from the Dutch national databases. Demographics, clinical characteristics and follow-up were recorded retrospectively. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients (16.5% of all registered patients with GTN) underwent hysterectomy as part of their management for GTN. The majority of patients was classified as low-risk disease (74.3%), post-molar GTN (73.5%) and disease confined to the uterus (65.1%). After hysterectomy, complete remission was achieved in 66.2% of patients with localized disease and in 15.8% of patients with metastatic disease. For patients with localized disease, treated with primary hysterectomy, treatment duration was significantly shorter (mean 3.2weeks and 8.0weeks respectively, p=0.01) with lower number of administered chemotherapy cycles (mean 1.5 and 5.8 respectively, p<0.01) than patients in a matched control group. CONCLUSION: In selected cases, a hysterectomy may be an effective means to either reduce or eliminate tumor bulk. Primary hysterectomy should mainly be considered in older patients with localized disease and no desire to preserve fertility, whereas patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease may benefit from additional hysterectomy, especially when disease is localized. For patients with widespread metastatic disease, the benefit of hysterectomy lies in the removal of chemotherapy-resistant tumor bulk with subsequent effect on survival.

Trends in incidence for gestational trophoblastic disease over the last 20 years in a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) represents a heterogeneous group of disorders. Wide variations in incidence rates are reported worldwide, probably explained by a lack of centralized databases and heterogeneity in case definition. The aim of the present study was to determine the trends in incidence of GTD in the last 20 years with the use of population-based data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of GTD between 1994 and 2013 were obtained from PALGA, a nationwide archive containing all pathology reports in the Netherlands. RESULTS: In the 20-year period 6343 cases were registered with GTD, representing an overall incidence rate of 1.67 per 1000 deliveries per year. An initial rise in incidence rate was seen over the first 10 years (0.075 per year, 95% CI 0.040-0.109), followed by a stabilization from 2004 to 2013 (increase per year 0.011, 95% CI -0.017-0.040). Although partial hydatidiform mole (HM) was more common in earlier years, complete and partial HM reached comparable incidence rates of 0.68 and 0.64 per 1000 deliveries respectively from 2009 onwards. In the last decade, unspecified HM diagnosis declined significantly from 0.14 per 1000 deliveries in 2003 to 0.03 per 1000 deliveries (per year -0.011, CI -0.016-0.06), suggesting improved diagnostic analyses. CONCLUSION: After an initial rise in GTD incidence in the Netherlands rates remained steady from 2004 onwards. As pathological confirmation is currently the norm and advanced pathological techniques are now widely available, true steady incidence rates may have been reached.