Impact of remote ischemic preconditioning preceding coronary artery bypass grafting on inducing neuroprotection.

BACKGROUND: Neurological complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduce quality of life, increase mortality, and inflate resource utilization. The risk of postoperative neurological complications parallels the increasing risk burden of the contemporary patient population. We evaluated the efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on inducing neuroprotection. METHODS: Seventy patients undergoing first-time CABG were randomly assigned to RIPC or a sham procedure. Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was complemented with functional connectivity MRI to gain a whole-brain global connectivity analysis. Paired neurocognitive and MRI data were acquired pre- and postoperatively. The primary end point was a composite of new ischemic brain lesions and neurocognitive impairment. Secondary end points included brain connectivity profiles, pooled ischemic volumes, and individual components of the primary outcome. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether a data set followed a normal distribution. The Fisher exact test was used to calculate the measures of association for categorical variables, whereas continuous data were tested with either the Mann-Whitney U test or the Student t test. RESULTS: There was no between-group difference in the incidence of the primary end point (9 [27%] in the RIPC group vs 8 [24%] in the control group, odds ratio, 1.17 [95% confidence interval, 0.34-4.06]; P = 1.0). Although RIPC did not reduce the incidence of brain ischemia (8/33 [24%] vs 7/33 [21%]; P = 1.0), the pooled ischemic volume was lower in the RIPC group (157 [interquartile range, 125-231] vs 777 [interquartile range, 564-965] mm3; P = .004). Postoperative neurocognition was marginally superior in the RIPC group as evidenced by a lower absolute number of abnormal neurocognitive tests in the RIPC group (7/99 [7%] vs 16/99 [16%]; odds ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.09]; P = .074). Robust reductions of functional connectivity profiles for the associative thalamus were documented in both groups, irrespective of RIPC (RIPC group, t = 3.31; P < .01; and the control group, t = 3.52; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Silent brain ischemia occurs frequently after CABG. RIPC did not reduce the incidence of the primary outcome. However, RIPC significantly reduced the pooled volume of ischemic brain lesions. Surgery adversely affected global brain connectivity, with RIPC conferring no demonstrable protection. The association of RIPC with superior neurocognitive test scores failed to cross the threshold for significance.

Impact of remote ischemic preconditioning preceding coronary artery bypass grafting on inducing neuroprotection (RIPCAGE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Neurological complications after cardiac surgery have a profound impact on postoperative survival and quality of life. The increasing importance of strategies designed to improve neurological outcomes mirrors the growing risk burden of the contemporary cardiac surgical population. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces adverse sequelae of ischemia in vulnerable organs by subjecting tissues with high ischemic tolerance to brief periods of hypoperfusion. This trial will evaluate the neuroprotective effect of RIPC in the cardiac surgical arena, by employing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurocognitive testing. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass will be screened for the study. Eligible patients will be randomized to undergo either a validated RIPC protocol or a sham procedure. The RIPC will be induced by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mmHg for 5 minutes, followed by a 5-minute reperfusion period. Three sequences of interchanging cuff inflations and deflations will be employed. Neurocognitive testing and MRI imaging will be performed preoperatively and on postoperative day 7. Paired pre- and postoperative neurocognitive and neuroimaging data will then be compared. The primary composite outcome measure will consist of new ischemic lesions on brain MRI, postprocedural impairment in brain connectivity on resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), and significant new declines in neurocognitive performance. The secondary endpoint measures will be the individual components of the primary endpoint measures, expressed as continuous variables, troponin T release on postoperative day 1 and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 months postoperatively. Major adverse cardiovascular events, including accumulating cardiovascular mortality, stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for ischemia, will form a composite endpoint measure. DISCUSSION: This trial will aim to assess whether RIPC in patients subjected to surgical myocardial revascularization employing cardiopulmonary bypass initiates a neuroprotective response. Should the results of this trial indicate that RIPC is effective in reducing the incidence of adverse neurological events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, it could impact on the current standard of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02177981.