Adjuvant Auger Electron-Emitting Radioimmunotherapy with [111In]In-DOTA-Panitumumab in a Mouse Model of Local Recurrence and Metastatic Progression of Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a high risk for recurrence and metastasis. We studied the effectiveness of Auger electron (AE) radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab conjugated with DOTA complexed to 111In ([111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab) for preventing metastatic progression after local treatment of 231/LM2-4 Luc+ human TNBC tumors in the mammary fat pad of NRG mice. Prior to RIT, the primary tumor was resected, and tumor margins were treated with X-irradiation (XRT; 5 days × 6 Gy/d). RIT was administered 1 day post-XRT by intravenous injection of 26 MBq (15 µg) or 2 × 10 MBq (15 µg each) separated by 7 d. These treatments were compared to tumor resection with or without XRT combined with DOTA-panitumumab (15 µg) or irrelevant [111In]In-DOTA-IgG2 (24 MBq; 15 µg), and efficacy was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The effect of [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab (23 MBq; 15 µg) after tumor resection without local XRT was also studied. Tumor resection followed by XRT and RIT with 26 MBq [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab significantly increased the median survival to 35 d compared to tumor resection with or without XRT (23-24 d; P < 0.0001). Local treatment with tumor resection and XRT followed by 2 × 10 MBq of [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab, DOTA-panitumumab, or [111In]In-DOTA-IgG2 did not significantly improve median survival (26 days for all treatments). RIT alone with [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab postresection of the tumor without XRT increased median survival to 29 days, though this was not significant. Despite significantly improved survival in mice treated with tumor resection, XRT, and RIT with [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab, all mice eventually succumbed to advanced metastatic disease by 45 d post-tumor resection. SPECT/CT with [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab, PET/MRI with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-panitumumab F(ab')2, and PET/CT with [18F]FDG were used to detect recurrent and metastatic disease. Uptake of [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab at 4 d p.i. in the MFP tumor was 26.8 ± 9.7% ID/g and in metastatic lymph nodes (LN), lungs, and liver was 34.2 ± 26.9% ID/g, 17.5 ± 6.0% ID/g, and 9.4 ± 2.4%ID/g, respectively, while uptake in the lungs (6.0 ± 0.9% ID/g) and liver (5.2 ± 2.9% ID/g) of non-tumor-bearing NRG was significantly lower (P < 0.05). Radiation-absorbed doses in metastatic LN, lungs, and liver were 9.7 ± 6.1, 6.4 ± 2.1, and 10.9 ± 2.7 Gy, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrated that RIT with [111In]In-DOTA-panitumumab combined with tumor resection and XRT significantly improved the survival of mice with recurrent TNBC. However, the aggressive nature of 231/LM2-4 Luc+ tumors in NRG mice may have contributed to the tumor recurrence and progression observed.

Panitumumab-DOTA-111In: An Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeted Theranostic for SPECT/CT Imaging and Meitner-Auger Electron Radioimmunotherapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) are overexpressed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and are an attractive target for the development of theranostic radiopharmaceuticals. We studied anti-EGFR panitumumab labeled with 111In (panitumumab-DOTA-111In) for SPECT/CT imaging and Meitner-Auger electron (MAE) radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of TNBC. Panitumumab-DOTA-111In was bound, internalized, and routed to the nucleus in MCF7, MDA-MB-231/Luc, and MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer (BC) cells dependent on the EGFR expression level (1.5 × 104, 1.7 × 105, or 1.3 × 106 EGFR/cell, respectively). The absorbed dose in the nuclei of MCF7, MDA-MB-231/Luc, and MDA-MB-468 cells incubated with 4.4 MBq of panitumumab-DOTA-111In (20 nM) was 1.20 ± 0.02, 2.2 ± 0.1, and 25 ± 2 Gy, respectively. The surviving fraction (SF) of MDA-MB-231/Luc cells treated with panitumumab-DOTA-111In (10-300 nM; 1.5 MBq/µg) was reduced as the absorbed dose in the cell increased, with clonogenic survival reduced to an SF = 0.12 ± 0.05 at 300 nM corresponding to 12.7 Gy. The SFs of MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231/Luc, and MCF7 cells treated with panitumumab-DOTA-111In (20 nM; 1.7 MBq/µg) were <0.01, 0.56 ± 0.05, and 0.67 ± 0.04, respectively. Unlabeled panitumumab had no effect on SF, and irrelevant IgG-DOTA-111In only modestly reduced the SF of MDA-MB-231/Luc cells but not MCF7 or MDA-MB-468 cells. The cytotoxicity of panitumumab-DOTA-111In was mediated by increased DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), cell cycle arrest at G2/M-phase and apoptosis measured by immunofluorescence detection by flow cytometry. MDA-MB-231/Luc tumors in the mammary fat pad (MFP) of NRG mice were clearly imaged with panitumumab-DOTA-111In by microSPECT/CT at 4 days postinjection (p.i.), and biodistribution studies revealed high tumor uptake [18 ± 2% injected dose/g (% ID/g] and lower normal tissue uptake (<10% ID/g). Administration of up to 24 MBq (15 µg) of panitumumab-DOTA-111In to healthy NRG mice caused no major hematological, renal, or hepatic toxicity with no decrease in body weight. Treatment of NOD SCID mice with MDA-MB-231 tumors with panitumumab-DOTA-111In (22 MBq; 15 µg) slowed tumor growth. The mean time for tumors to reach a volume of ≥500 mm3 was 61 ± 5 days for RIT with panitumumab-DOTA-111In compared to 42 ± 6 days for mice treated with irrelevant IgG2-DOTA-111In (P < 0.0001) and 35 ± 3 days for mice receiving 0.9% NaCl (P < 0.0001). However, tumors regrew at later time points. The median survival of mice treated with panitumumab-DOTA-111In was 70 days versus 46 days for IgG2-DOTA-111In (P < 0.0001) or 40 days for 0.9% NaCl (P < 0.0001). We conclude that panitumumab-DOTA-111In is a promising theranostic agent for TNBC. Increasing the administered amount of panitumumab-DOTA-111In and/or combination with radiosensitizing PARP inhibitors used for treatment of patients with TNBC may provide a more durable response to RIT.

Changing Surface Polyethylene Glycol Architecture Affects Elongated Nanoparticle Penetration into Multicellular Tumor Spheroids.

Nanoparticles (NPs) designed for biomedical applications are coated with protein-repellent polymers. Here, we examine the penetration of rodlike NPs with narrow size distributions (Ln = 170 nm, wn = 12 nm) into multicellular tumor spheroids prepared from two human cancer cell lines. Two types of NPs with different core materials [polyferrocenylsilane and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC)] were coated with a dense brush of poly(oligoethyleneglycol methacrylate) (POEGMA), while a second CNC NP sample was coated with a linear polyethylene glycol (PEG) brush. While the core material had little influence, the coating material was strikingly important, with POEGMA-coated NPs penetrating much more deeply into the tumor spheroids than the NPs coated with linear PEG. Localization experiments using 111In-labeled POEGMA-coated CNC NPs showed that most of the radioactivity remained in the interstitial space (ca. 78%) with little cell uptake (ca. 6%). Hence, the deep penetration of these nanorods into tumor spheroids is associated with an interstitial diffusion pathway through the extracellular matrix and not cellular transcytosis.

Imaging of HER2-Positive Tumors in NOD/SCID Mice with Pertuzumab Fab-Hexahistidine Peptide Immunoconjugates Labeled with [99mTc]-(I)-Tricarbonyl Complex.

PURPOSE: Molecular imaging of tumor HER2 expression may allow patient selection for HER2-targeted therapies. Our aim was to introduce hexahistidine (His6) peptides into pertuzumab Fab to enable labeling with the [99mTc(CO)3(H2O)3]+ complex and study these radioimmunoconjugates for microSPECT/CT imaging of HER2-positive tumor xenografts in mice. PROCEDURES: Fab were produced by papain digestion of pertuzumab and reacted with sulfo-SMCC for conjugation to His6-containing peptides (CGYGGHHHHHH). His6-peptide conjugation was measured by a radiometric assay. His6-pertuzumab Fab were labeled at 0.4-1.0 MBq/µg with [99mTc(CO)3(H2O)3]+ for 1 h at 37 °C. HER2 immunoreactivity was assessed in a direct (saturation) binding assay using HER2-overexpressing SK-BR-3 human breast cancer (BC) cells. MicroSPECT/CT and biodistribution studies were performed in NOD/SCID mice with HER2-positive s.c. SK-OV-3 human ovarian cancer, or MDA-MB-361 or MDA-MB-231 human BC xenografts at 4 or 24 h post i.v. injection of [99mTc]His6-pertuzumab Fab (29-49 MBq, 70 µg). The specificity of tumor uptake was assessed by comparison to irrelevant [99mTc]Fab 3913 in SK-OV-3 tumor-bearing mice. RESULTS: SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated cleavage of pertuzumab to produce Fab, which eluted as a single peak with a retention time of 13.8 min on SE-HPLC. Fab were conjugated to 2.1 ± 0.5 His6 peptides and labeled with [99mTc(CO)3(H2O)3]+ to a radiochemical purity of 92-97 % at 0.4-0.8 MBq/µg. [99mTc]His6-pertuzumab Fab exhibited saturable and specific binding to SK-BR-3 cells with a KD = 51.3 ± 5.2 × 10-9 M and Bmax = 3.5 ± 0.1 × 106 receptors/cell. SK-OV-3 tumors were imaged at 4 and 24 h p.i [99mTc]His6-pertuzumab Fab. Tumor uptake at 24 h p.i. was 4.1 ± 0.6 %ID/g, which was 13-fold significantly greater than [99mTc]Fab 3913 (0.3 ± 0.0 %ID/g; P < 0.01). MicroSPECT/CT imaged HER2-overexpressing MDA-MB-361 tumors but not MDA-MB-231 tumors with low HER2 expression. Tumor uptake was 5.2-fold significantly greater at 24 h p.i. in MDA-MB-361 than MDA-MB-231 tumors (3.2 ± 0.1 %ID/g vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 %ID/g; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MicroSPECT/CT with [99mTc]His6-pertuzumab Fab imaged tumors in NOD/SCID mice that exhibited intermediate or high HER2 expression, but not tumors with low HER2. [99mTc]His6-pertuzumab Fab is promising for SPECT imaging of tumor HER2 expression.

Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review.

BACKGROUND: Auger electrons (AEs) are very low energy electrons that are emitted by radionuclides that decay by electron capture (e.g. 111In, 67Ga, 99mTc, 195mPt, 125I and 123I). This energy is deposited over nanometre-micrometre distances, resulting in high linear energy transfer (LET) that is potent for causing lethal damage in cancer cells. Thus, AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents have great potential for treatment of cancer. In this review, we describe the radiobiological properties of AEs, their radiation dosimetry, radiolabelling methods, and preclinical and clinical studies that have been performed to investigate AEs for cancer treatment. RESULTS: AEs are most lethal to cancer cells when emitted near the cell nucleus and especially when incorporated into DNA (e.g. 125I-IUdR). AEs cause DNA damage both directly and indirectly via water radiolysis. AEs can also kill targeted cancer cells by damaging the cell membrane, and kill non-targeted cells through a cross-dose or bystander effect. The radiation dosimetry of AEs considers both organ doses and cellular doses. The Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) schema may be applied. Radiolabelling methods for complexing AE-emitters to biomolecules (antibodies and peptides) and nanoparticles include radioiodination (125I and 123I) or radiometal chelation (111In, 67Ga, 99mTc). Cancer cells exposed in vitro to AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents exhibit decreased clonogenic survival correlated at least in part with unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) detected by immunofluorescence for γH2AX, and chromosomal aberrations. Preclinical studies of AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents have shown strong tumour growth inhibition in vivo in tumour xenograft mouse models. Minimal normal tissue toxicity was found due to the restricted toxicity of AEs mostly on tumour cells targeted by the radiotherapeutic agents. Clinical studies of AEs for cancer treatment have been limited but some encouraging results were obtained in early studies using 111In-DTPA-octreotide and 125I-IUdR, in which tumour remissions were achieved in several patients at administered amounts that caused low normal tissue toxicity, as well as promising improvements in the survival of glioblastoma patients with 125I-mAb 425, with minimal normal tissue toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Proof-of-principle for AE radiotherapy of cancer has been shown preclinically, and clinically in a limited number of studies. The recent introduction of many biologically-targeted therapies for cancer creates new opportunities to design novel AE-emitting agents for cancer treatment. Pierre Auger did not conceive of the application of AEs for targeted cancer treatment, but this is a tremendously exciting future that we and many other scientists in this field envision.