Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Pharyngeal Flow Limitation during Sleep: Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b).

RATIONALE: Pharyngeal flow limitation during pregnancy may be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes but was previously challenging to quantify. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a novel objective measure of flow limitation identifies an increased risk of preeclampsia (primary outcome) and other adverse outcomes in a prospective cohort: Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study Monitoring Mothers-to-be. METHODS: Flow limitation severity scores (0%=fully obstructed, 100%=open airway)- quantified from breath-by-breath airflow shape-were obtained from home sleep tests during early (6-15 weeks) and mid (22-31 weeks) pregnancy. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between flow limitation (median overnight severity, both time-points averaged) and preeclampsia, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), race, ethnicity, chronic hypertension, and flow limitation during wakefulness. Secondary outcomes were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and infant birthweight. RESULTS: Of 1939 participants with flow limitation data at both time-points (age: 27.0±5.4 yr [mean±sd], BMI: 27.7±6.1 kg·m-2), 5.8% developed preeclampsia, 12.7% developed HDP, and 4.5% developed GDM. Greater flow limitation was associated with increased preeclampsia risk: adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) 2.49, 95% Confidence Interval [1.69, 3.69], per 2SD increase in severity. Findings persisted in women without sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index <5 events·hr-1). Flow limitation was associated with HDP (OR: 1.77 [1.33, 2.38]) and reduced infant birthweight (83.7 [31.8, 135.6] g), but not GDM. CONCLUSIONS: Greater flow limitation is associated with increased risk of preeclampsia, HDP, and lower infant birthweight. Flow limitation may provide an early target for mitigating the consequences of sleep disordered breathing during pregnancy.

Sleep Quality in Individuals with and without Persistent Postpartum Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare sleep quality at 1 year postpartum following a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) among individuals with persistent postpartum hypertension (HTN) compared with those with normal blood pressures (BPs). STUDY DESIGN: We combined data from the Heart Health 4 New Moms pilot randomized trial (n = 118) and the Pathways prospective cohort study (n = 36). Individuals with a singleton pregnancy complicated by gestational HTN or preeclampsia underwent a research study visit at a mean 48.7 ± 9.5 weeks postpartum with standardized BP measurement and assessment of subjective sleep quality with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Persistent postpartum HTN was defined as Stage 1 HTN or greater (mean systolic BP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean diastolic BP ≥ 80 mm Hg over three measurements at rest) or requiring antihypertensive medication. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 154 individuals with an HDP included in the analysis, 84 (55%) were normotensive at 1 year postpartum and 70 (45%) had persistent postpartum HTN. Individuals with persistent postpartum HTN were more likely to be older, self-identify as Black race, have higher prepregnancy and 1-year postpartum body mass index (BMI), be multiparous, and deliver at an earlier gestational age. The mean global PSQI score was 8.7 ± 3.7, with 81% reporting poor sleep (PSQI > 5), and scores were higher among individuals who were persistently hypertensive (9.6 ± 3.5) compared with those who were normotensive at 1 year postpartum (7.9 ± 3.6), p < 0.01. Findings were unchanged in a multivariable model adjusting for age, self-reported race, prepregnancy BMI, and parity. CONCLUSION: Following an HDP, individuals reported poor sleep quality at 1 year postpartum. Individuals with persistent postpartum HTN reported lower sleep quality, suggesting that sleep behavior may be a target for intervention to improve maternal cardiovascular health following an HDP. KEY POINTS: · After an HDP, poor sleep quality was common at 1 year postpartum.. · Those with persistent postpartum HTN reported worse sleep quality at 1 year postpartum.. · Sleep behavior may be a target for intervention to improve maternal cardiovascular health..

The effect of a neonatal sleep intervention on maternal postpartum hypertension: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In nonpregnant adults, poor sleep is associated with higher blood pressure. Poor sleep is common in the postpartum period and is often attributed to infant caretaking needs. However, its effects on cardiovascular health in individuals with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of a neonatal sleep intervention on maternal postpartum blood pressure in individuals with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-institution pilot randomized controlled trial from July 2021 to March 2022, 110 individuals with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy were randomized to receive a neonatal sleep intervention (SNOO responsive bassinet) plus usual care of safe sleep education (n=54) or usual care alone (n=56). Remote follow-up visits were conducted at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 4 months after delivery and involved blood pressure and weights, sleep and mood questionnaires, and self-reported infant and maternal sleep logs. Based on institutional data, the sample size had 80% power to detect a 4.5-mm Hg difference in the primary outcome of mean arterial pressure at 6 weeks after delivery. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the arms. At 1 week after delivery, the intervention arm had lower mean arterial pressure and less antihypertensive medication use than the control arm (99±10 vs 103±7 mm Hg [P=.04] and 23% vs 35% [P=.15], respectively). At 6 weeks after delivery, mean arterial pressure was similar between arms (93±8 vs 94±8 mm Hg; P=.54), but there was a lower rate of antihypertensive use in the intervention arm (15% vs 26%; P=.19). Scores from maternal sleep and mood questionnaires at 6 weeks after delivery and self-reported infant and maternal sleep duration at 6 weeks and 4 months after delivery were similar between arms (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The SNOO responsive bassinet as a neonatal sleep intervention did not result in improved mean arterial pressure at 6 weeks after delivery after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

The association between multidimensional sleep health and gestational weight gain.

BACKGROUND: Although poor sleep health is associated with weight gain and obesity in the non-pregnant population, research on the impact of sleep health on weight change among pregnant people using a multidimensional sleep health framework is needed. OBJECTIVES: This secondary data analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcome Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be Sleep Duration and Continuity Study (n = 745) examined associations between mid-pregnancy sleep health indicators, multidimensional sleep health and gestational weight gain (GWG). METHODS: Sleep domains (i.e. regularity, nap duration, timing, efficiency and duration) were assessed via actigraphy between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. We defined 'healthy' sleep in each domain with empirical thresholds. Multidimensional sleep health was based on sleep profiles derived from latent class analysis and composite score defined as the sum of healthy sleep domains. Total GWG, the difference between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and the last measured weight before delivery, was converted to z-scores using gestational age- and BMI-specific charts. GWG was defined as low (<-1 SD), moderate (-1 or +1 SD) and high (>+1 SD). RESULTS: Nearly 50% of the participants had a healthy sleep profile (i.e. healthy sleep in most domains), whereas others had a sleep profile defined as having varying degrees of unhealthy sleep in each domain. The individual sleep domains were associated with a 20%-30% lower risk of low or high GWG. Each additional healthy sleep indicator was associated with a 10% lower risk of low (vs. moderate), but not high, GWG. Participants with late timing, long duration and low efficiency (vs. healthy) profiles had the strongest risk of low GWG (relative risk 1.5, 95% confidence interval 0.9, 2.4). Probabilistic bias analysis suggested that most associations between individual sleep health indicators, sleep health profiles and GWG were biased towards the null. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should determine whether sleep health is an intervention target for healthy GWG.

Association between Sleep Disordered Breathing and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether objectively measured sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in a cohort of nulliparous individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the nuMom2b sleep disordered breathing substudy was performed. Individuals underwent in-home sleep studies for SDB assessment in early (6-15 weeks' gestation) and mid-pregnancy (22-31 weeks' gestation). SDB was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 events/h at either time point. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, or receipt of respiratory support, treated hyperbilirubinemia or hypoglycemia, large-for-gestational age, seizures treated with medications or confirmed by electroencephalography, confirmed sepsis, or neonatal death. Individuals were categorized into (1) early pregnancy SDB (6-15 weeks' gestation), (2) new onset mid-pregnancy SDB (22-31 weeks' gestation), and (3) no SDB. Log-binomial regression was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) representing the association. RESULTS: Among 2,106 participants, 3% (n = 75) had early pregnancy SDB and 5.7% (n = 119) developed new-onset mid-pregnancy SDB. The incidence of the primary outcome was higher in the offspring of individuals with early (29.3%) and new onset mid-pregnancy SDB (30.3%) compared with individuals with no SDB (17.8%). After adjustment for maternal age, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and body mass index, new onset mid-pregnancy SDB conferred increased risk (RR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.94), where there was no longer statistically significant association between early pregnancy SDB and the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: New onset, mid-pregnancy SDB is independently associated with neonatal morbidity. KEY POINTS: · Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a common condition impacting pregnancy with known maternal risks.. · Objectively defined SDB in pregnancy was associated with a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes.. · New onset SDB in mid pregnancy conferred statistically significant increased risk..

Care plan for individuals at risk for preeclampsia: shared approach to education, strategies for prevention, surveillance, and follow-up.

Preeclampsia is a multisystemic disorder of pregnancy that affects 250,000 pregnant individuals in the United States and approximately 10 million worldwide per annum. Preeclampsia is associated with substantial immediate morbidity and mortality but also long-term morbidity for both mother and offspring. It is now clearly established that a low dose of aspirin given daily, beginning early in pregnancy modestly reduces the occurrence of preeclampsia. Low-dose aspirin seems safe, but because there is a paucity of information about long-term effects on the infant, it is not recommended for all pregnant individuals. Thus, several expert groups have identified clinical factors that indicate sufficient risk to recommend low-dose aspirin preventive therapy. These risk factors may be complemented by biochemical and/or biophysical tests that either indicate increased probability of preeclampsia in individuals with clinical risk factors, or more importantly, identify increased likelihood in those without other evident risk. In addition, the opportunity exists to provide this population with additional care that may prevent or mitigate the short- and long-term effects of preeclampsia. Patient and provider education, increased surveillance, behavioral modification, and other approaches to improve outcomes in these individuals can improve the chance of a healthy outcome. We assembled a group with diverse, relevant expertise (clinicians, investigators, advocates, and public and private stakeholders) to develop a care plan in which providers and pregnant individuals at risk can work together to reduce the risk of preeclampsia and associated morbidities. The plan is for care of individuals at moderate to high risk for developing preeclampsia, sufficient to receive low-dose aspirin therapy, as identified by clinical and/or laboratory findings. The recommendations are presented using the GRADE methodology with the quality of evidence upon which each is based. In addition, printable appendices with concise summaries of the care plan's recommendations for patients and healthcare providers are provided. We believe that this shared approach to care will facilitate prevention of preeclampsia and its attendant short- and long-term morbidity in patients identified as at risk for development of this disorder.

The association between multidimensional sleep health and gestational weight gain: nuMoM2b Sleep Duration and Continuity Study.

Background: Although poor sleep health is associated with weight gain and obesity in the non-pregnant population, research on the impact of sleep health on weight change among pregnant people using a multidimensional sleep-health framework is needed. This study examined associations among mid-pregnancy sleep health indicators, multidimensional sleep health, and gestational weight gain (GWG). Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcome Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be Sleep Duration and Continuity Study (n=745). Indicators of individual sleep domains (i.e., regularity, nap duration, timing, efficiency, and duration) were assessed via actigraphy between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. We defined "healthy" sleep in each domain based on empirical thresholds. Multidimensional sleep health was based on sleep profiles derived from latent class analysis. Total GWG, the difference between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and the last measured weight before delivery, was converted to z-scores using gestational age- and BMI-specific charts. GWG was defined as low (<-1 SD), moderate (-1 or +1 SD), and high (>+1 SD). Results: Nearly 50% of the participants had a healthy sleep profile (i.e., healthy sleep in most domains), whereas others had a sleep profile defined as having varying degrees of poor health in each domain. While indicators of individual sleep domains were not associated with GWG, multidimensional sleep health was related to low and high GWG. Participants with a sleep profile characterized as having low efficiency, late timing, and long sleep duration (vs. healthy sleep profile) had a higher risk (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0, 3.1) of low GWG a lower risk of high GWG (RR 0.5 95% CI 0.2, 1.1) (vs. moderate GWG). Conclusions: Multidimensional sleep health was more strongly associated with GWG than individual sleep domains. Future research should determine whether sleep health is a valuable intervention target for optimizing GWG. Synopsis: Study question: What is the association between mid-pregnancy multidimensional sleep health and gestational weight gain?What's already known?: Sleep is associated with weight and weight gain outside of pregnancyWhat does this study add?: We identified patterns of sleep behaviors associated with an increased risk of low gestational weight gain.

Sleep intervention and glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Over 50% of pregnant people report poor sleep quality and insomnia, with approximately 25% reporting short sleep (<7 hours per night). Short sleep duration is associated with impaired glucose functioning, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although short sleep is associated with elevated blood glucose in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, it is not known whether education on healthy sleep habits during pregnancy can improve sleep and thus glycemic control in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We developed a sleep education program specific to pregnancy and targeted to patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of this intervention in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. STUDY DESIGN: A sleep education program specific to pregnancy, "Sleep-4-2," was developed via multidisciplinary collaboration between specialists in maternal-fetal medicine, sleep medicine, and psychiatry. The program was presented to focus groups of pregnant people and a separate group of healthcare providers to gauge acceptability of the program and to modify content. This program was then tested on a group of patients diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. Participants were randomized to a group receiving standard gestational diabetes mellitus care or a group participating in the sleep education program. Baseline demographics, sleep knowledge, and self-reported sleep quality information were obtained from all participants at enrollment and again at 35 weeks of pregnancy. Change in sleep knowledge and quality and degree of glycemic control were compared between groups. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and July 2019, 140 patients were screened and 74 were enrolled in the study and randomized. Recruitment to the study was acceptable, with >50% of eligible approached patients agreeing to participate, and retention in the intervention group was high at 94%. We did not demonstrate any difference in sleep knowledge or in the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a sleep education program specific to pregnancy for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus was feasible in the context of typical care. A definitive trial could be developed on the basis of this pilot study to evaluate whether a sleep intervention in pregnancy can improve glycemic control in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Associations between evening shift work, irregular sleep timing, and gestational diabetes in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b).

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Shift work is a risk factor for cardiometabolic disease, possibly through effects on sleep-wake rhythms. We hypothesized that evening (afternoon and night combined) and irregular (irregular/on-call or rotating combined) shift work during pregnancy is associated with increased odds of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), mediated by irregular sleep timing. METHODS: The Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) is a prospective cohort study (n = 10 038) designed to investigate risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Medical outcomes were determined with medical record abstraction and/or questionnaires; sleep midpoint was measured in a subset of participants with ≥5-day wrist actigraphy (ActiWatch). We estimated the association of evening and irregular shift work during pregnancy with preeclampsia, preterm birth, and GDM using logistic regression, adjusted for adversity (cumulative variable for poverty, education, health insurance, and partner status), smoking, self-reported race/ethnicity, and age. Finally, we explored whether the association between shiftwork and GDM was mediated by variability in sleep timing. RESULTS: Evening shift work is associated with approximately 75% increased odds of developing GDM (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.12-2.66); we did not observe associations with irregular shifts, preterm birth, or preeclampsia after adjustment. Pregnant evening shift workers were found to have approximately 45 minutes greater variability in sleep timing compared to day workers (p < .005); sleep-timing variability explained 25% of the association between evening shift work and GDM in a mediation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Evening shift work was associated with GDM, and this relationship may be mediated by variability in sleep timing.

A trial of positive airway pressure for the treatment of sleep apnea in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy remains poorly understood and studies examining the effect of treatment with positive airway pressure on pregnancy have been limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a randomized controlled trial of positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Participants with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 underwent polysomnography at 14 to 20 weeks' gestation (visit 1) and those with obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 but <50) were enrolled. In phase 1, participants were randomized to autotitrating positive airway pressure vs sham positive airway pressure; in phase 2, the sham arm was replaced with a sleep hygiene control. Participants returned at 28 to 31 weeks' gestation (visit 2). The mean arterial blood pressure, uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, endoglin, soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 levels, and placental growth factor levels were measured, as well as fasting glucose and insulin to calculate insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance). The primary outcome was a composite of the uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 to placental growth factor ratio, and the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance. For secondary analyses, each outcome variable was analyzed independently. Adherence to treatment was examined. RESULTS: A total of 241 participants completed visit 1, and 89 (37%) had an apnea-hypopnea index between 5 and 50. Of the those, 51 participants were randomized in phase 1 and 38 in phase 2. There was no significant difference in our primary outcome by treatment group. In secondary analyses, the uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index was lower in participants on autotitrating positive airway pressure when compared with sleep hygiene controls. Otherwise, there were no differences in the mean arterial blood pressure, angiogenic markers, or metabolic markers in phase 1, phase 2, or across the entire study. The overall adherence to autotitrating positive airway pressure therapy was low, but the mean use was greater in phase 2 (0.3±0.6 hours/night vs 1.3±2.3 hours/night; P=.10). For those on active therapy, fasting glucose values decreased as adherence increased. CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial of autotitrating positive airway pressure in pregnancy did not find any differences in a composite primary cardiometabolic risk profile between the treatment groups. Higher autotitrating positive airway pressure adherence was associated with lower fasting glucose levels. The use of a sham positive airway pressure control arm in phase1 may have negatively impacted adherence to active treatment.

The association between sleep-disordered breathing and maternal endothelial and metabolic markers in pregnancies complicated by obesity.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) on vascular, angiogenic and metabolic analytes in pregnancy. METHODS: Participants with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 underwent polysomnography at 14-20 weeks gestation (visit 1). Participants with SDB (defined as an apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 events/h) were then enrolled in a separate trial. SDB-negative participants returned for a polysomnogram at 28-31 weeks (visit 2) and were recategorized as persistent-negative SDB or new-onset SDB. Mean arterial blood pressure, mean uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, endoglin, soluble Feline McDonough Sarcoma-like tyrosine kinase 1, placental growth factor, and the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance were measured after each visit. Our primary outcome was a composite of uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor ratio, and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance. For secondary analyses, each outcome variable was analyzed independently. RESULTS: A total of 242 and 130 participants completed visit 1 and visit 2, respectively. Newly diagnosed SDB was present in 37% of individuals at visit 1 and 31% of individuals at visit 2. No significant differences in our composite outcome vector were observed in individuals with and without SDB at either visit. In our secondary analysis, mean arterial blood pressure (88.7 ± 7.3 mm Hg vs 85.4 ± 7.1 mm Hg, P = .04) and fasting glucose (92.4 ± 15.2 mg/dL vs 86.6 ± 11.5 mg/dL, P = .05) were higher in participants with early pregnancy SDB. These associations were not observed for new-onset SDB. No associations were observed between uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index and angiogenic markers and SDB in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: SDB in early pregnancy was not associated with our composite primary outcome but was associated with higher mean arterial blood pressure and fasting glucose. The pathophysiologic changes that occur in pregnant individuals with SDB and how they lead to an increased risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes remain poorly understood. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Sleep Disordered Breathing, Obesity and Pregnancy Study (SOAP); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02086448; Identifier: NCT02086448. CITATION: Onslow ML, Wolsk J, Wisniewski S, et al. The association between sleep-disordered breathing and maternal endothelial and metabolic markers in pregnancies complicated by obesity. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):97-109.

Common Sleep Disorders in Pregnancy.

Compared with men, women have a greater risk of sleep disorders and report higher rates of sleep disturbance. Hormonal and physiologic changes throughout the life span appear to influence a woman's ability to get a good night's sleep. Sleep disturbances are commonly reported during pregnancy, affecting more than one-half of all pregnancies and increasing as gestation progresses. The pervasiveness of sleep complaints during pregnancy may lead to a belief that these symptoms are normal or to be expected. Unfortunately, this perception may impede the accurate diagnosis of sleep disorders during this crucial time. Obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia, and restless legs syndrome are the most common sleep disorders in pregnancy. Sleep disruption in pregnancy can substantially worsen maternal quality of life and may be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This review outlines important considerations for obstetricians taking care of pregnant patients with sleep-related complaints.

Sleep-disordered Breathing in Pregnancy and after Delivery: Associations with Cardiometabolic Health.

Rationale: Knowledge gaps exist regarding health implications of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) identified in pregnancy and/or after delivery. Objectives: To determine whether SDB in pregnancy and/or after delivery is associated with hypertension (HTN) and metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods: nuMoM2b-HHS (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be Heart Health Study) (N = 4,508) followed participants initially recruited during their first pregnancy. Participants returned for a visit 2-7 years after pregnancy. This study examined a subgroup who underwent SDB assessments during their first pregnancy (n = 1,964) and a repeat SDB assessment after delivery (n = 1,222). Two SDB definitions were considered: 1) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ⩾ 5 and 2) oxygen desaturation index (ODI) ⩾ 5. Associations between SDB and incident HTN and MS were evaluated with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs). Measurements and Main Results: The aRR for MS given an AHI ⩾ 5 during pregnancy was 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.93), but no association with HTN was found. ODI ⩾ 5 in pregnancy was associated with both an increased risk for HTN (aRR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.30-3.14) and MS (aRR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.19-1.97). Participants with an AHI ⩾ 5 in pregnancy that persisted after delivery were at higher risk for both HTN (aRR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.84-7.73) and MS (aRR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.59-3.76). Similar associations were observed for persistent ODI ⩾ 5 after delivery. Conclusions: An AHI ⩾ 5 in pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of MS. An ODI ⩾ 5 in pregnancy was significantly associated with both HTN and MS. Participants with persistent elevations in AHI and ODI during pregnancy and at 2-7 years after delivery were at the highest risk for HTN and MS. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02231398).

Can We Use Home Sleep Testing for the Evaluation of Sleep Apnea in Obese Pregnant Women?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a type III home sleep testing (HST) monitor including its autoscoring algorithm, in a population of obese pregnant women. METHODS: This was an ancillary study of an ongoing prospective study of obese (BMI of ≥30) pregnant women. For the primary study, women undergo serial in-lab polysomnograms (PSG) during pregnancy. Sleep apnea was defined as an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥ 5 events/hour. A subgroup of women were asked to wear an ApneaLink HST device for 1 night, within 2 weeks of a late pregnancy PSG (≥ 28 weeks' gestation). The AHI obtained from PSG was compared to the AHI from the HST via autoscoring (HST-auto) as well as the AHI via technician scoring (HST-tech). We calculated Shrout Fleiss Fixed correlation coefficients (ICC) and looked at positive-positive and negative-negative agreement. RESULTS: 43 women were recruited and we obtained 30 valid HST. The mean PSH AHI was 3.3 (±3.2, range 0.5-16.6). Six (20%) women had a positive PSG study. ICCs were 0.78 for HST-auto versus HST-tech, 0.76 for HST-auto versus PSG, and 0.70 for HST-tech versus PSG. Categorical agreement was also strong, with 24/30 (80.0%) for HST-auto versus HST-tech, 25/30 (83.3%) for HST-auto versus PSG, and 23/30 (76.7%) for HST-tech versus PSG. CONCLUSION: In obese women evaluated in late pregnancy, we found relatively high intraclass correlation and categorical agreement among HST-auto scores, HST-tech scores, and in-lab PSG results obtained within a two-week window. These results suggest that HST may be used to screen pregnant women for OSA.

Pregnancy after periviable birth: making the case for innovative delivery of interpregnancy care.

Objective: Women who have had a spontaneous periviable delivery are at high risk for recurrent preterm delivery. The objective of our study was to determine interpregnancy interval (IPI) after periviable birth as well as percentage of women taking 17 alpha hydroxyprogesteronecaproate (17OHP-C) after periviable birth. We then examined the association between adherence with a postpartum visit after a periviable birth and IPI as well as receipt of 17OHP-C. Materials and methods: We included all women with a periviable delivery (20-26-week gestation) due to spontaneous preterm birth at Magee Women's Hospital between 2009 and 2014, who had their subsequent delivery at our institution during or before May of 2016. Information on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes was obtained from the Magee Obstetrical Medical and Infant (MOMI) database as well as chart abstraction. We calculated IPI, proportion of women who received 17OHP-C in their next pregnancy, and attendance rates with a postpartum visit. The relationship between attendance with a postpartum visit and IPI, and receipt of 17OHP-C was examined with a logistic regression. Results: During the study period, 361 women had a spontaneous periviable birth. A total of 60 women had a subsequent delivery at Magee Women's Hospital. Only 33/60 (52.5%) presented for a postpartum visit after their periviable delivery. The median IPI for the cohort was 12.5 months (interquartile range: 6.4, 17.5 months) and 21.0% (n = 13) had an IPI less than 6 months. Adherence with the postpartum visit was not associated with an IPI less than 6 months. A total of 18.33% (11 women) did not receive 17OHP-C in their subsequent pregnancy. Women who attended a postpartum visit were much more likely to receive 17OHP-C (p = .001). Conclusions: Many women with a history of a periviable birth do not optimize strategies to reduce their risk of recurrent preterm birth. While attendance with a postpartum visit was associated with greater receipt of 17OHP-C in the subsequent pregnancy, given the overall poor rate of attendance with the postpartum visit in this cohort, novel strategies to counsel women about interpregnancy health are needed.

Later sleep timing is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth in nulliparous women.

BACKGROUND: Although uterine contractions have a diurnal periodicity and increase in frequency during hours of darkness, data on the relationship between sleep duration and sleep timing patterns and preterm birth are limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the relationship of self-reported sleep duration and timing in pregnancy with preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: In the prospective Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcome Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be cohort, women completed a survey of sleep patterns at 6-13 weeks gestation (visit 1) and again at 22-29 weeks gestation (visit 3). Additionally, at 16-21 weeks gestation (visit 2), a subgroup completed a weeklong actigraphy recording of their sleep. Weekly averages of self-reported sleep duration and sleep midpoint were calculated. A priori, sleep duration of <7 hours was defined as "short," and sleep midpoint after 5 am was defined as "late." The relationships among these sleep characteristics and all preterm birth and spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks gestation were examined in univariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regressions that controlled for age and body mass index alone (model 1) and with additional covariates (race, smoking, insurance, and employment schedule) following a backward elimination process (model 2) were performed. RESULTS: Of the 10,038 women who were enrolled, sleep survey data were available on 7524 women at visit 1 and 7668 women at visit 3. The rate of short sleep duration was 17.1% at visit 1 and 20.7% at visit 3. The proportion with a late sleep midpoint was 11.6% at visit 1 and 12.2% at visit 3. There was no significant relationship between self-reported short sleep and preterm birth across all visits. However, self-reported late sleep midpoint (>5 am) was associated with preterm birth . Women with a late sleep midpoint (>5 am) in early pregnancy had a preterm birth rate of 9.5%, compared with 6.9% for women with sleep midpoint ≤5 am (P=.005). Similarly, women with a late sleep midpoint had a higher rate of spontaneous preterm birth (6.2% vs 4.4%; P=.019). Comparable results were observed for women with a late sleep midpoint at visit 3 (all preterm birth 8.9% vs 6.6%; P=.009; spontaneous preterm birth 5.9% vs 4.3%; P=.023). All adjusted analyses on self-reported sleep midpoint (models 1 and 2) maintained statistical significance (P<.05), except for visit 1, model 2 for spontaneous preterm birth (P=.07). The visit 2 objective data from the smaller subgroup (n=782) demonstrated similar trends in preterm birth rates by sleep midpoint status. CONCLUSION: Self-reported late sleep midpoint in both early and late pregnancy, but not short sleep duration, is associated with an increased rate of preterm birth.