Evaluation of oral health education programs for oral health of individuals with visual impairment: An umbrella review.

AIM: To exemplify, summarize and critically appraise the systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated different oral health education (OHE) interventions in individuals with visual impairment (VI). METHODOLOGY: Six electronic databases were searched for SRs evaluating OHE programs in individuals with VI. The internal validity of the included SRs was evaluated using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. The degree of overlap of the primary studies in the included SRs was calculated using the "corrected covered area (CCA)" approach. RESULTS: Seven SRs were included in this umbrella review that included 30 primary studies with a CCA of 26% (very high overlap). Six of the included SRs were assessed to have critically low confidence in the results, whereas only one had moderate confidence. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of various OHE methods for individuals with VI might be better than using one method alone to improve oral hygiene. There is no conclusive evidence that one OHE method is superior to others. However, the evidence of OHE in improving the outcomes related to dental trauma or caries is inconclusive. Furthermore, it appears that most of the evaluations of oral health programs come from limited parts of the world, and data from many other regions is lacking.

Levodopa Positively Affects Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced form of the disease, in which excess vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces growth of new blood vessels that leak fluid, accounting for 90% of vision loss in AMD. Dysfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium likely initiates AMD. Retinal pigment epithelial cells express a G protein-coupled receptor, GPR143, which downregulates VEGF in response to levodopa. Anti-VEGF therapy effectively treats nAMD, suggesting that excessive VEGF activity drives the pathology. METHODS: In an open-label pilot study, in patients with newly diagnosed nAMD and naïve to anti-VEGF injections (Cohort-1), the effects of carbidopa-levodopa on vision and anatomic outcomes were evaluated for 4 weeks. Then patients were followed 5 months further with ascending levodopa doses. Patients previously treated with anti-VEGF injection therapy (Cohort-2) were also treated with ascending levodopa doses and evaluated for 6 months. RESULTS: Levodopa was safe, well tolerated, and delayed anti-VEGF injection therapy while improving visual outcomes. In the first month, retinal fluid decreased by 29% (P = .02, n = 12) without anti-VEGF treatment. Through 6 months the decrease in retinal fluid was sustained, with a mean frequency of 0.38 injections/month. At month 6, mean visual acuity improved by 4.7 letters in Cohort-1 (P = .004, n = 15) and by 4.8 letters in Cohort-2 (P = .02, n = 11). Additionally, there was a 52% reduction in the need for anti-VEGF injections in Cohort-2 (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest efficacy and support the pharmacological targeting of GPR143 with levodopa for the treatment of nAMD in future studies.

First evidence for silica condensation within the solar protoplanetary disk.

Calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) and amoeboid olivine aggregates (AOAs), a refractory component of chondritic meteorites, formed in a high-temperature region of the protoplanetary disk characterized by approximately solar chemical and oxygen isotopic (Δ17O ∼ -24‰) compositions, most likely near the protosun. Here we describe a 16O-rich (Δ17O ∼ -22 ± 2‰) AOA from the carbonaceous Renazzo-type (CR) chondrite Yamato-793261 containing both (i) an ultrarefractory CAI and (ii) forsterite, low-Ca pyroxene, and silica, indicating formation by gas-solid reactions over a wide temperature range from ∼1,800 to ∼1,150 K. This AOA provides direct evidence for gas-solid condensation of silica in a CAI/AOA-forming region. In a gas of solar composition, the Mg/Si ratio exceeds 1, and, therefore, silica is not predicted to condense under equilibrium conditions, suggesting that the AOA formed in a parcel of gas with fractionated Mg/Si ratio, most likely due to condensation of forsterite grains. Thermodynamic modeling suggests that silica formed by condensation of nebular gas depleted by ∼10× in H and He that cooled at 50 K/hour at total pressure of 10-4 bar. Condensation of silica from a hot, chemically fractionated gas could explain the origin of silica identified from infrared spectroscopy of remote protostellar disks.

Coccidioidomycosis as a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia.

The early manifestations of coccidioidomycosis (valley fever) are similar to those of other causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Without specific etiologic testing, the true frequency of valley fever may be underestimated by public health statistics. Therefore, we conducted a prospective observational study of adults with recent onset of a lower respiratory tract syndrome. Valley fever was serologically confirmed in 16 (29%) of 55 persons (95% confidence interval 16%-44%). Antimicrobial medications were used in 81% of persons with valley fever. Symptomatic differences at the time of enrollment had insufficient predictive value for valley fever to guide clinicians without specific laboratory tests. Thus, valley fever is a common cause of CAP after exposure in a disease-endemic region. If CAP develops in persons who travel or reside in Coccidioides-endemic regions, diagnostic evaluation should routinely include laboratory evaluation for this organism.

Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is effective in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by valsartan monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind parallel-group randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of fixed combination valsartan 160 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (Val 160/HCTZ 12.5) once daily (o.d.) and Val 160/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (Val 160/HCTZ 25) o.d. vs Val 160 o.d. monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension not adequately controlled with valsartan monotherapy. METHOD: A total of 2002 patients whose BP was inadequately controlled with 4 weeks of Val 160 mg o.d. monotherapy were randomized to treatment for 8 weeks with Val 160 (n = 666), Val 160/HCTZ 12.5 (n = 670) or Val 160/HCTZ 25 (n = 666). RESULTS: Active treatment significantly reduced BP in all groups over the 12 weeks of the study (p < 0.001). The greatest reductions were achieved with Val 160/HCTZ 25. Reductions were 10.8, 12.8 and 14.2 mmHg (sitting diastolic blood pressure) and 15.7, 19.4 and 21.8 mmHg (sitting systolic blood pressure), for the Val 160, Val 160/HCTZ 12.5 and Val 160/HCTZ 25 groups, respectively. Responder rates were high in all groups (49%, 62% and 68%). In elderly patients (> or = 65 years) responder rates of 70% were achieved with Val 160/HCTZ 25. All treatments were well tolerated, in all patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Val 160 plus HCTZ 12.5 or HCTZ 25 provides effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients inadequately controlled after 4 weeks of monotherapy. In elderly patients a responder rate of 70% was achieved with Val 160/HCTZ 25.

A comparative trial of controlled-onset, extended-release verapamil, enalapril, and losartan on blood pressure and heart rate changes.

BACKGROUND: The excess morning risk of myocardial infarction and stroke may be attributable to the rapid rise in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate in the hours after awakening. The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was to compare once-daily, controlled-onset, extended-release (COER-24) verapamil to enalapril and losartan on BP and heart rate during the postawakening morning phase as well as throughout the 24-h period. METHODS: A total of 406 patients were randomized to an 8-week forced-titration period with one of the following: 1) COER-24 verapamil 240 mg/day titrated to 360 mg/day; 2) enalapril 10 mg/day titrated to 20 mg/day, 3) losartan 50 mg/day titrated to 100 mg/day, or 4) placebo. Office BP and heart rate and ambulatory 24-h BP monitoring was performed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. RESULTS: Each active treatment, as compared with placebo, lowered BP both during the morning hours as well as the entire 24-h period. COER-24 verapamil was more effective in lowering morning systolic (-16.6 mm Hg) and diastolic (-11.9 mm Hg) BP than either enalapril or losartan (P < .001). For the entire 24-h period, the effects of COER-24 verapamil (-11.6/-8.4 mm Hg) were comparable to enalapril (- 13.4/-8.3 mm Hg; P = NS). Losartan achieved a similar 24-h effect on systolic pressure (-9.3 mm Hg) but was less effective on diastolic pressure (-5.4 mm Hg; P = .004 v COER-verapamil). Unlike losartan or enalapril, COER-24 verapamil was the only treatment to lower the heart rate over both the 24-h period (-4.6 beats/min; P < .001) and during waking hours (-4.6 beats/min; P < .001). A blunted rate of rise in BP, heart rate, and rate-pressure product occurred during the postawakening period with COER-verapamil (P = .03) but not with either of the other treatment arms. Lastly, the decline in BP at night was similar for COER-verapamil and losartan and greater with enalapril (P = .014) CONCLUSIONS: COER-24 verapamil produces changes in BP and pulse that more closely match the normal circadian hemodynamic rhythms than either do enalapril or losartan.