Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Syst Rev ; 10(1): 6, 2021 01 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33397453

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The growing societal and economic impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is further compounded by the present lack of disease-modifying interventions. Non-pharmacological intervention approaches, such as exercise, have the potential to be powerful approaches to improve or mitigate the symptoms of AD without added side effects or financial burden associated with drug therapies. Various forms and regiments of exercise (i.e., strength, aerobic, multicomponent) have been reported in the literature; however, conflicting evidence obscures clear interpretation of the value and impact of exercise as an intervention for older adults with AD. The primary objective of this review will be to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions for older adults with AD. In addition, this review will evaluate the evidence quality and synthesize the exercise training prescriptions for proper clinical practice guidelines and recommendations. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be carried out by an interdisciplinary collective representing clinical and research stakeholders with diverse expertise related to neurodegenerative diseases and rehabilitation medicine. Literature sources will include the following: Embase, PsychINFO, OVID Medline, and Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily. Inclusion criteria are participants with late onset AD and structured exercise interventions with prescribed duration, frequency, and intensity. The primary outcome of this study will center on improved or sustained cognitive functioning. Secondary outcomes will include institutionalization-related outcomes, ability in activities of daily living, mood and emotional well-being, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Analysis procedures to include measurement of bias, data synthesis, sensitivity analysis, and assessment of heterogeneity are described in this protocol. DISCUSSION: This review is anticipated to yield clinically meaningful insight on the specific value of exercise for older adults with AD. Improved understanding of diverse exercise intervention approaches and their specific impact on various health- and function-related outcomes is expected to guide clinicians to more frequently and accurately prescribe meaningful interventions for those affected by AD. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020175016 .


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Cognição , Terapia por Exercício , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(4): 712-716, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809752

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) when measuring an individual's satisfaction with functional mobility. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional self-report data. SETTING: Assistive technology center within an academic medical center in the Midwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with a disability that use or plan to use a mobility device (N=871). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FMA. RESULTS: All FMA items (10/10) contributed to a single unidimensional construct with good to strong fit to a unidimensional confirmatory factor model. Rasch analysis revealed that the rating scale, majority of persons (>90%), and all items fit the Rasch measurement model. The FMA demonstrated adequate reliability (person reliability=0.85) and separated persons into 3 strata: those with high, medium, and low satisfaction with functional mobility. CONCLUSIONS: The FMA is an appropriate measure for use in research and clinical settings to quantify satisfaction with functional mobility among mobility device users.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/reabilitação , Equipamentos Ortopédicos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Cadeiras de Rodas , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Mot Behav ; 49(1): 8-19, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27592596

RESUMO

Stroke remains a leading cause of disability, with survivors experiencing long-term decrements in independence and quality of life. Occupational therapists (OTs) employ numerous neurorehabilitative treatment approaches to remediate impairments that are impeding performance. OTs also use physical agent modalities to facilitate increased participation and success in therapy. One such modality is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form a noninvasive brain stimulation that can be overlaid onto task practice and delivers a constant, low intensity current into the brain. tDCS is safe, portable, and efficacious in remediating a variety of deficits, yet is not consistently incorporated into clinical practice. The authors discuss the mechanisms, safety, evidence, and potential applications of tDCS to enhance outcomes for this growing population.


Assuntos
Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua/métodos , Animais , Humanos , Córtex Motor/fisiologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...