Safety and efficacy of the AngioJet in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Appraisal Study of Rheolytic Thrombectomy (FAST).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of the AngioJet coronary device, given the uncertain risk-benefit balance of rheolytic thrombectomy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Current risk of inadequate myocardial perfusion for thrombus embolization in primary coronary interventions is not negligible. The AngioJet thrombectomy device showed promising results in terms of safety and efficacy, but failed to confirm them in a large, multicenter, randomized trial, and the risk-benefit balance is still uncertain. METHODS: The AngioJet device was employed in 116 consecutive patients with AMI and angiographic evidence of extensive thrombosis in a vessel with a reference diameter > 2.5 mm. Stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were liberally used. Epicardial and myocardial reperfusion angiographic parameters, and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e., cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) were assessed. RESULTS: The AngioJet was successfully used in all patients. Angiographic analysis showed that the AngioJet significantly improved epicardial coronary flow (p < 0.01), frame count (p < 0.01) and myocardial blush (p < 0.01), while stenting yielded significant improvements only in diameter stenosis, minimum lesion diameter and correlated vessel parameters (p < 0.01). In-hospital MACE were uncommon [9 (8%)], despite the patientsO characteristics. When compared to an AMI population with similar thrombus burden but not undergoing thrombectomy, our AngioJet population showed significant improvement of reperfusion parameters. Moreover, there was greater AngioJet benefit in the high versus moderate thrombus burden subset; laboratory and operator experience also correlated significantly with final angiographic results. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the favorable risk-benefit profile of AngioJet device use in selected patients with AMI when used in experienced laboratories and by trained operators.

The incidence and timing of major arrhythmias following successful primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefits of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) on malignant arrhythmias in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction have not yet been established. METHODS: We prospectively investigated the incidence and timing of major arrhythmias occurring during direct PTCA and within 24 hours of mechanical reperfusion in 90 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing successful direct PTCA within 12 hours of symptom onset. RESULTS: Ventricular fibrillation and complete atrioventricular block occurred exclusively during direct PTCA and both resolved in the catheterization laboratory. Holter monitoring showed that ventricular tachyarrhythmias, such as runs of more than 3 extrasystoles, were detectable only during the first 8 hours after direct PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: In our group of patients undergoing successful direct PTCA, no in-hospital life-threatening arrhythmias occurred after this procedure.

Early outcome after paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction. A clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) have been proven to prevent in-stent restenosis in patients submitted to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. No data are so far available about the safety and efficacy of PES in acute and subacute myocardial infarction. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the occurrence of in-hospital adverse events in patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction submitted to PES implantation. METHODS: From June 1 to July 31, 2003, we implanted 53 PES in 43 consecutive patients with acute (34 patients) and subacute (9 patients) myocardial infarction. RESULTS: In 65.1% of the patients the culprit lesion was located in the left anterior descending artery. Direct stenting was performed in 27.9% and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 74.4%. Before the procedure a TIMI flow 0-1 was present in 46.5% while post-procedural TIMI flow 3 was achieved in all patients. A pre-procedural TIMI thrombus grade 2 to 5 was present in 67.8%. No death, reinfarction, early post-infarction angina or any other episode referable to in-stent thrombosis were observed during hospitalization. No patient was submitted to target lesion revascularization. At short-term follow-up with a mean duration of 118 +/- 75 days from discharge no cardiac or noncardiac death, reinfarction or any other major adverse coronary events were reported in the study population and no target lesion revascularization was performed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, PES implant in patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction was safe, with an early outcome comparable to conventional standard stents and no adverse events related to acute or subacute thrombosis.