Multicenter study. Nursing professionals' perception of training needs in pain assessment in pediatric patients with cognitive dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cognitive dysfunction are at greater risk of pain than typically developing children. Pain assessment in these patients is complex and could generate uncertainty in health professionals about what the key aspects are. AIM: To determine the training needs perceived by nursing professionals regarding acute pain assessment in pediatric patients with cognitive dysfunction. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study was performed using a survey addressed to nursing professionals who work in pediatrics during the months of August and September 2022. RESULTS: 163 responses were obtained. Most of the professionals who responded were female (92.6%, n = 151), with a mean age of 38.98 ±â€¯10.40 years. The most frequent work unit was the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), in 36% (n = 58). Most of the participants reported not having previously received training on pain assessment in pediatric patients with cognitive disabilities (85.9%, n = 139). However, 70.4% (n = 114) considered it "very necessary" for the development of their work to receive specific training on this topic. Knowing how to assess acute pain in this population (85.3%, n = 139) and knowing the clinical and behavioral manifestations of pain in this type of patient (84.7%, n = 138) were the aspects that obtained higher scores. CONCLUSION: This research notes more than 90% of participants consider "quite necessary" and "strong necessary" to be training in pediatric cognitive dysfunction patients pain assessment. Furthermore, work experience, academic education and to be pediatric specialist obtain statistical significance data.

Specificity and sensibility of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale for assessing pain, grade of sedation and withdrawal syndrome in the critically ill paediatric patient. Multicentre COSAIP study (Phase 1).

AIM: The main aim of this investigation was to analyse the specificity and sensibility of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale (CBS-S) in assessing grade of pain, sedation, and withdrawal syndrome in paediatric critical care patients. METHOD: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multicentre study conducted in Level III Intensive Care Areas of 5 children's university hospitals. Grade of sedation was assessed using the Spanish version of the CBS-S and the Bispectral Index on sedation, once per shift over one day. Grade of withdrawal was determined using the CBS-S and the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1, once per shift over three days. RESULTS: A total of 261 critically ill paediatric patients with a median age of 5.07 years (P25:0.9-P75:11.7) were included in this study. In terms of the predictive capacity of the CBS-S, it obtained a Receiver Operation Curve of .84 (sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 76%) in relation to pain; .62 (sensitivity of 21% and specificity of 78%) in relation to sedation grade, and .73% (sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 74%) in determining withdrawal syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale could be a useful, sensible and easy scale to assess the degree of pain, sedation and pharmacological withdrawal of critically ill paediatric patients.

Especificidad y sensibilidad de la COMFORT Behavior Scale-Versión española para valorar el dolor, el grado de sedación y síndrome de abstinencia en el paciente crítico pediátrico. Estudio multicéntrico COSAIP (Fase 1) / Specificity and sensibility of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale for assessing pain, grade of sedation and withdrawal syndrome in the critically ill paediatric patient. Multicentre COSAIP study (Phase 1)

Objetivo: El objetivo principal de la investigación fue analizar la especificidad y sensibilidad de la escala COMFORT Behavior Scale-Versión española (CBS-ES) en la determinación del grado de dolor, sedación y síndrome de abstinencia.Método: Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional, analítico y transversal y multicéntrico en unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricas de 5 hospitales españoles. Se valoró el grado de sedación del paciente crítico pediátrico de forma simultánea empleando para ello la CBS-ES y registrando los valores del Bispectral Index Sedation, una vez por turno durante un día. El grado de abstinencia se determinó una vez por turno, durante 3 días, empleando de forma simultánea la CBS-ES y la Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1.Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 261 pacientes críticos pediátricos con una mediana de 1,61 años (P25: 0,35-P75: 6,55). Por lo que a la capacidad predictiva de la CBS-ES se refiere se obtuvo un área bajo la curva de 0,84 (sensibilidad del 81% y especificidad del 76%) con relación al dolor; de 0,62 (sensibilidad del 27% y especificidad del 78%) en el caso de la sedación, y de 0,73 (sensibilidad del 40% y especificidad del 74%) en el del síndrome de abstinencia.Conclusiones: Se ha podido contrastar que la CBS-ES podría ser un instrumento sensible, útil y fácil de emplear para valorar el grado de dolor, sedación y síndrome de abstinencia farmacológico del paciente crítico pediátrico.

Aim: The main aim of this investigation was to analyse the specificity and sensibility of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale (CBS-S) in assessing grade of pain, sedation, and withdrawal syndrome in paediatric critical care patients.Method: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multicentre study conducted in Level III Intensive Care Areas of 5 children's university hospitals. Grade of sedation was assessed using the Spanish version of the CBS-S and the Bispectral Index on sedation, once per shift over one day. Grade of withdrawal was determined using the CBS-S and the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1, once per shift over three days.Results: A total of 261 critically ill paediatric patients with a median age of 5.07 years (P25:0.9-P75:11.7) were included in this study. In terms of the predictive capacity of the CBS-S, it obtained a Receiver Operation Curve of .84 (sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 76%) in relation to pain; .62 (sensitivity of 21% and specificity of 78%) in relation to sedation grade, and .73% (sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 74%) in determining withdrawal syndrome.Conclusions: The Spanish version of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale could be a useful, sensible and easy scale to assess the degree of pain, sedation and pharmacological withdrawal of critically ill paediatric patients.

Grado de sedación del paciente crítico pediátrico y variables sociodemográficas y clínicas correlacionadas. Estudio multicéntrico COSAIP / Grade of sedation in the critically ill paediatric patient and its correlation with sociodemographic and clinical variables. Multicentre COSAIP study

Objetivos Determinar los niveles de sedación del paciente crítico pediátrico mediante el Biespectral Index Sensor (BIS) y analizar la relación entre el grado de sedación y las variables sociodemográficas y clínicas del paciente. Métodos Estudio observacional, analítico, transversal y multicéntrico de mayo de 2018 a enero de 2020 desarrollado en 5unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricas del territorio español. Se registraron como variables sociodemográficas y clínicas el sexo, la edad, motivo de ingreso, si el paciente tenía enfermedad crónica, el tipo y número de fármacos que se le estaban administrando y la duración de la estancia. Además, se anotaron los valores del BIS una vez por turno, mañana y noche, durante 24 h. Resultados Se incluyó en el estudio a un total de 261 pacientes, de los cuales el 53,64% eran del sexo masculino, con una edad mediana de 1,61 años (0,35-6,55). El 70,11% (n=183) estaban analgosedados y monitorizados con el sensor BIS. Se observó una mediana en las puntuaciones globales de BIS de 51,24±14,96 en el turno de mañana y de 50,75±15,55 en el de noche. No se detectó significación estadística al comparar los niveles de BIS y las diversas variables sociodemográficas y clínicas del paciente crítico pediátrico. Conclusiones A pesar de las limitaciones inherentes al sensor BIS, los estudios existentes y el que aquí se presenta muestran que el BIS es un instrumento útil para monitorizar el grado de sedación en el paciente crítico pediátrico. Se requieren más investigaciones que objetiven qué variables relacionadas con el paciente tienen más peso en al grado de analgosedación y que contrasten clínicamente la eficacia de escalas como, por ejemplo, la COMFORT Behavior Scale versión española. (AU)

Aims To determine the grade of sedation in the critically ill paediatric patient using Biespectral Index Sensor (BIS) and to analyse its relationship with sociodemographic and clinical patient variables. Methods Observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multicentre study performed from May 2018 to January 2020 in 5 Spanish paediatric critical care units. Sex, age, reason for admission, presence of a chronic pathology, type and number of drugs and length of stay were the sociodemographic and clinical variables registered. Furthermore, the grade of sedation was assessed using BIS, 11per shift over 24hours. Results A total of 261 paediatric patients, 53.64% of whom were male, with a median age of 1.61 years (0.35-6.55), were included in the study. Of the patients, 70.11% (n=183) were under analgosedation and monitored using the BIS sensor. A median of BIS values of 51.24±14.96 during the morning and 50.75±15.55 during the night were observed. When comparing BIS values and sociodemographic and clinical paediatric variables no statistical significance was detected. Conclusions Despite the limitations of the BIS, investigations and the present study show that BIS could be a useful instrument to assess grade of sedation in critically ill paediatric patients. However, further investigations which determine the sociodemographic and clinical variables involved in the grade of paediatric analgosedation, as well as studies that contrast the efficacy of clinical scales like the COMFORT Behaviour Scale-Spanish version, are required. (AU)

Grade of sedation in the critically ill pediatric patient and its correlation with sociodemographic and clinical variables. Multicentre COSAIP study.

AIMS: To determine the grade of sedation in the critically ill paediatric patient using Biespectral Index Sensor (BIS) and to analyse its relationship with sociodemographic and clinical patient variables. METHODS: Observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multicentre study performed from May 2018 to January 2020 in 5 Spanish paediatric critical care units. Sex, age, reason for admission, presence of a chronic pathology, type and number of drugs and length of stay were the sociodemographic and clinical variables registered. Furthermore, the grade of sedation was assessed using BIS, once per shift over 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 261 paediatric patients, 53.64% of whom were male, with a median age of 1.61 years (0.35-6.55), were included in the study. Of the patients, 70.11% (n = 183) were under analgosedation and monitored using the BIS sensor. A median of BIS values of 51.24 ±â€¯14.96 during the morning and 50.75 ±â€¯15.55 during the night were observed. When comparing BIS values and sociodemographic and clinical paediatric variables no statistical significance was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of the BIS, investigations and the present study show that BIS could be a useful instrument to assess grade of sedation in critically ill paediatric patients. However, further investigations which determine the sociodemographic and clinical variables involved in the grade of paediatric analgosedation, as well as studies that contrast the efficacy of clinical scales like the COMFORT Behaviour Scale-Spanish version, are required.

Specificity and sensibility of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale for assessing pain, grade of sedation and withdrawal syndrome in the critically ill paediatric patient. Multicentre COSAIP study (Phase 1). / Especificidad y sensibilidad de la COMFORT Behavior Scale-Versión española para valorar el dolor, el grado de sedación y síndrome de abstinencia en el paciente crítico pediátrico. Estudio multicéntrico COSAIP (Fase 1).

AIM: The main aim of this investigation was to analyse the specificity and sensibility of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale (CBS-S) in assessing grade of pain, sedation, and withdrawal syndrome in paediatric critical care patients. METHOD: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multicentre study conducted in Level III Intensive Care Areas of 5 children's university hospitals. Grade of sedation was assessed using the Spanish version of the CBS-S and the Bispectral Index on sedation, once per shift over one day. Grade of withdrawal was determined using the CBS-S and the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1, once per shift over three days. RESULTS: A total of 261 critically ill paediatric patients with a median age of 5.07 years (P25:0.9-P75:11.7) were included in this study. In terms of the predictive capacity of the CBS-S, it obtained a Receiver Operation Curve of .84 (sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 76%) in relation to pain; .62 (sensitivity of 21% and specificity of 78%) in relation to sedation grade, and .73% (sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 74%) in determining withdrawal syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the COMFORT Behaviour Scale could be a useful, sensible and easy scale to assess the degree of pain, sedation and pharmacological withdrawal of critically ill paediatric patients.

Grade of sedation in the critically ill paediatric patient and its correlation with sociodemographic and clinical variables. Multicentre COSAIP study. / Grado de sedación del paciente crítico pediátrico y variables sociodemográficas y clínicas correlacionadas. Estudio multicéntrico COSAIP.

AIMS: To determine the grade of sedation in the critically ill paediatric patient using Biespectral Index Sensor (BIS) and to analyse its relationship with sociodemographic and clinical patient variables. METHODS: Observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multicentre study performed from May 2018 to January 2020 in 5 Spanish paediatric critical care units. Sex, age, reason for admission, presence of a chronic pathology, type and number of drugs and length of stay were the sociodemographic and clinical variables registered. Furthermore, the grade of sedation was assessed using BIS, 11per shift over 24hours. RESULTS: A total of 261 paediatric patients, 53.64% of whom were male, with a median age of 1.61 years (0.35-6.55), were included in the study. Of the patients, 70.11% (n=183) were under analgosedation and monitored using the BIS sensor. A median of BIS values of 51.24±14.96 during the morning and 50.75±15.55 during the night were observed. When comparing BIS values and sociodemographic and clinical paediatric variables no statistical significance was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of the BIS, investigations and the present study show that BIS could be a useful instrument to assess grade of sedation in critically ill paediatric patients. However, further investigations which determine the sociodemographic and clinical variables involved in the grade of paediatric analgosedation, as well as studies that contrast the efficacy of clinical scales like the COMFORT Behaviour Scale-Spanish version, are required.

Adaptación transcultural y características de la versión española de la escala COMFORT Behavior Scale en el paciente crítico pediátrico / Transcultural adaptation and characteristics of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale in pediatric critical care patients

OBJETIVOS: Determinar las propiedades métricas de la escala COMFORT Behavior Scale desarrollada por van Dijk et al. (2000) en el contexto del paciente crítico pediátrico. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional, psicométrico y prospectivo. LUGAR DE ESTUDIO: Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de un hospital pediátrico y universitario de tercer nivel asistencial. PACIENTES: Un total de 311 niños con una mediana de edad de 5,07 años (0,9-11,7). INTERVENCIONES: Ninguna. PRINCIPALES VARIABLES Y RESULTADOS: La escala fue administrada de forma simultánea por 2enfermeros a 311 pacientes ingresados en una unidad de críticos de 18 camas de un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel asistencial. La versión española de la COMFORT Behavior Scale obtuvo un alfa de Cronbach de 0,715 y está compuesta por 3factores, con 2ítems cada uno: 1) alerta y movimiento físico; 2) calma/agitación y respuesta respiratoria/llanto, y 3) tono muscular y tensión facial. CONCLUSIONES: La escala COMFORT B logró ser adaptada al idioma español y mostró ser válida para determinar y cuantificar el grado de confort en un grupo de niños ingresados en una unidad de cuidados pediátricos española

OBJECTIVES: To determine the measurement properties of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale developed by van Dijk et al. (2000) in pediatric critical care patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational and psychometric study. SETTING: Level III Intensive Care Area at a university's children hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 311 children with median age of 5.07 years (IQR = 0.9-11.7). INTERVENTIONS: None. PRINCIPAL VARIABLES AND RESULTS: To determine the measurement properties the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale was simultaneous administered by 2nurses to 311 patients admitted to an eighteen-bed critical care unit of a third level pediatric hospital. The Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale obtained a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.715 and it is a tool made up of 3factors with 2items: 1) alertness and physical movement; 2) calmness/agitation and respiratory response/crying, and 3) muscle tone and facial tension. CONCLUSIONS: The COMFORT B was adapted to Spanish and it has shown to be a valid an reliable tool to assess comfort in a group of children admitted to an Spanish Intensive Care Unit

Transcultural adaptation and characteristics of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale in pediatric critical care patients. / Adaptación transcultural y características de la versión española de la escala COMFORT Behavior Scale en el paciente crítico pediátrico.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the measurement properties of the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale developed by van Dijk et al. (2000) in pediatric critical care patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational and psychometric study. SETTING: Level III Intensive Care Area at a university's children hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 311 children with median age of 5.07 years (IQR = 0.9-11.7). INTERVENTIONS: None. PRINCIPAL VARIABLES AND RESULTS: To determine the measurement properties the Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale was simultaneous administered by 2nurses to 311 patients admitted to an eighteen-bed critical care unit of a third level pediatric hospital. The Spanish version of the COMFORT Behavior Scale obtained a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.715 and it is a tool made up of 3factors with 2items: 1) alertness and physical movement; 2) calmness/agitation and respiratory response/crying, and 3) muscle tone and facial tension. CONCLUSIONS: The COMFORT B was adapted to Spanish and it has shown to be a valid an reliable tool to assess comfort in a group of children admitted to an Spanish Intensive Care Unit.

Diez cuestiones que debería considerar antes de enviar un artículo a una revista científica / Ten questions you should consider before submitting an article to a scientific journal

Investigar implica no solo conocer los métodos y diseños de investigación, sino que comporta comprender las estrategias para la difusión y publicación de los resultados en las revistas científicas. Se considera que una investigación termina cuando está publicada y es divulgada entre la comunidad científica. La publicación de un manuscrito no es sencilla, puesto que conlleva pasar por un riguroso proceso editorial evaluador para garantizar la calidad científica de dicha propuesta. El objetivo de este artículo es comunicar a los autores potenciales los principales errores o deficiencias que normalmente y de forma general justifican la decisión de no aceptar un artículo científico por parte de los revisores de revistas científicas. A partir de la experiencia de las autoras como revisoras de revistas nacionales e internacionales del ámbito de la enfermería y las ciencias de la salud, se identifican un total de 10 tipos o grupos, que versan sobre los errores de formulación, las incongruencias entre diferentes partes del texto, la falta de estructuración, un lenguaje poco preciso, las lagunas respecto a información y la detección de imprecisiones relevantes. La identificación y el análisis de estas cuestiones permiten prevenirlas, siendo de gran utilidad a los futuros investigadores a la hora de difundir los resultados de sus trabajos a la comunidad científica. En definitiva, la mejor estrategia de difusión es aquella que asegura la calidad científica del trabajo y que no escatima esfuerzos para prevenir dichos errores o deficiencias que los revisores suelen detectar en los artículos evaluados

Investigating involves not only knowing the research methods and designs; it involves knowing the strategies for disseminating and publishing the results in scientific journals. An investigation is considered complete when it is published and is disclosed to the scientific community. The publication of a manuscript is not simple, since it involves examination by a rigorous editorial process evaluator to ensure the scientific quality of the proposal. The objective of this article is to communicate to potential authors the main errors or deficiencies that typically and routinely explain the decision by the referees of scientific journals not to accept a scientific article. Based on the experience of the authors as referees of national and international journals in the field of nursing and health sciences, we have identified a total of 10 types or groups, which cover formulation errors, inconsistencies between different parts of the text, lack of structuring, imprecise language, information gaps, and the detection of relevant inaccuracies. The identification and analysis of these issues enables their prevention, and is of great use to future researchers in the dissemination of the results of their work to the scientific community. In short, the best publishing strategy is one that ensures the scientific quality of the work and spares no effort in avoiding the errors or deficiencies that referees routinely detect in the articles they evaluate

Validez de contenido de una escala de confort crítico pediátrico mediante una metodología mixta / Validity of contents of a paediatric critical comfort scale using mixed methodology

Introducción: La enfermedad crítica en el paciente pediátrico incluye desde una patología aguda en un niño sano a una agudización de una enfermedad crónica, hecho que ha conllevado centrar su atención clínica en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos. El rol del/la enfermero/a pediátrico/a se centra también en promover el confort en estos pacientes críticos. Por este motivo, es necesario disponer de instrumentos de medida que permitan un correcto sensado del grado de confort. Objetivo: Describir el proceso de validación de contenido de una escala de confort crítico pediátrico mediante el empleo de una metodología mixta. Material y métodos: Se realizó una adaptación transcultural del inglés al español mediante el método de traducción-retraducción de la Comfort Behavior Scale. Posteriormente, se validó el contenido de la misma mediante una metodología mixta. Esta segunda etapa se dividió en una fase cuantitativa empleando un cuestionario ad hoc donde se valoró la relevancia/pertinencia y el redactado de cada dominio/ítem de la escala y en una cualitativa donde se realizaron dos reuniones con profesionales sanitarios, pacientes y un familiar siguiendo las recomendaciones de la metodología Delphi. Resultados: Todos los ítems y dominios obtuvieron un índice de validez de contenido >0,80, exceptuando el movimiento físico, en su relevancia, que obtuvo un 0,76. El índice global de validez de contenido de la escala fue de 0,87 (elevado). Durante la fase cualitativa se reformularon y/o eliminaron ítems de cada uno de los dominios de la escala para hacerla más comprensible y aplicable. Conclusiones: El empleo de una metodología mixta de validación de contenido otorga riqueza y sensibilidad evaluatoria al instrumento a diseñar (AU)

Introduction: Critical illness in paediatric patients includes acute conditions in a healthy child as well as exacerbations of chronic disease, and therefore these situations must be clinically managed in Critical Care Units. The role of the paediatric nurse is to ensure the comfort of these critically ill patients. To that end, instruments are required that correctly assess critical comfort. Objective: To describe the process for validating the content of a paediatric critical comfort scale using mixed-method research. Material and Methods: Initially, a cross-cultural adaptation of the Comfort Behavior Scale from English to Spanish using the translation and back-translation method was made. After that, its content was evaluated using mixed method research. This second step was divided into a quantitative stage in which an ad hoc questionnaire was used in order to assess each scale's item relevance and wording and a qualitative stage with two meetings with health professionals, patients and a family member following the Delphi Method recommendations. Results: All scale items obtained a content validity index >0.80, except physical movement in its relevance, which obtained 0.76. Global content scale validity was 0.87 (high). During the qualitative stage, items from each of the scale domains were reformulated or eliminated in order to make the scale more comprehensible and applicable. Conclusions: The use of a mixed-method research methodology during the scale content validity phase allows the design of a richer and more assessment-sensitive instrument (AU)

Ten questions you should consider before submitting an article to a scientific journal. / Diez cuestiones que debería considerar antes de enviar un artículo a una revista científica.

Investigating involves not only knowing the research methods and designs; it involves knowing the strategies for disseminating and publishing the results in scientific journals. An investigation is considered complete when it is published and is disclosed to the scientific community. The publication of a manuscript is not simple, since it involves examination by a rigorous editorial process evaluator to ensure the scientific quality of the proposal. The objective of this article is to communicate to potential authors the main errors or deficiencies that typically and routinely explain the decision by the referees of scientific journals not to accept a scientific article. Based on the experience of the authors as referees of national and international journals in the field of nursing and health sciences, we have identified a total of 10 types or groups, which cover formulation errors, inconsistencies between different parts of the text, lack of structuring, imprecise language, information gaps, and the detection of relevant inaccuracies. The identification and analysis of these issues enables their prevention, and is of great use to future researchers in the dissemination of the results of their work to the scientific community. In short, the best publishing strategy is one that ensures the scientific quality of the work and spares no effort in avoiding the errors or deficiencies that referees routinely detect in the articles they evaluate.

Validity of contents of a paediatric critical comfort scale using mixed methodology. / Validez de contenido de una escala de confort crítico pediátrico mediante una metodología mixta.

INTRODUCTION: Critical illness in paediatric patients includes acute conditions in a healthy child as well as exacerbations of chronic disease, and therefore these situations must be clinically managed in Critical Care Units. The role of the paediatric nurse is to ensure the comfort of these critically ill patients. To that end, instruments are required that correctly assess critical comfort. OBJECTIVE: To describe the process for validating the content of a paediatric critical comfort scale using mixed-method research. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Initially, a cross-cultural adaptation of the Comfort Behavior Scale from English to Spanish using the translation and back-translation method was made. After that, its content was evaluated using mixed method research. This second step was divided into a quantitative stage in which an ad hoc questionnaire was used in order to assess each scale's item relevance and wording and a qualitative stage with two meetings with health professionals, patients and a family member following the Delphi Method recommendations. RESULTS: All scale items obtained a content validity index >0.80, except physical movement in its relevance, which obtained 0.76. Global content scale validity was 0.87 (high). During the qualitative stage, items from each of the scale domains were reformulated or eliminated in order to make the scale more comprehensible and applicable. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a mixed-method research methodology during the scale content validity phase allows the design of a richer and more assessment-sensitive instrument.

Reliability and validity of the Positive Mental Health Questionnaire in a sample of Spanish university students.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: In general, the current studies of positive mental health use questionnaires or parts thereof. However, while these questionnaires evaluate aspects of positive mental health, they fail to measure the construct itself. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The widespread use and the lack of specific questionnaires for evaluating the positive mental health construct justify the need to measure the robustness of the Positive Mental Health Questionnaire. Also six factors are proposed to measure positive mental health. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The availability of a good questionnaire to measure positive mental health in university students is useful not only to promote mental health but also to strengthen the curricula of future professionals. ABSTRACT: Introduction Nursing has a relevant role in managing mental health. It is important to identify and thereafter to enhance positive aspects of mental health among university nursing students. Aim The aim of the present study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Questionnaire (PMHQ) in terms of reliability and validity using confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of university students. Method A cross-sectional study was carried out in a sample of 1091 students at 4 nursing schools in Catalonia, Spain. The reliability of the PMHQ was measured by means of Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and the test-retest stability was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the validity of the factorial structure. Results Cronbach's alpha coefficient was satisfactory (>0.70) for four of the six subscales or dimensions and ranged from 0.54 to 0.79. ICC analysis was satisfactory for the six subscales or dimensions. The hypothesis was confirmed in the analysis of the correlations between subclasses and the overall scale, with the strongest correlations being found between the majority of the subscales and the overall scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model proposed for the factors fit the data satisfactorily. Discussion This scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating positive mental health in university students. Implications for Practice A good questionnaire to measure positive mental health in university students is useful not only to promote mental health but also to strengthen the curricula of future professionals.

[The nursing profession regarding limitation of life support treatment in the intensive care units. Technical and practical features]. / La enfermera frente a la limitación del tratamiento de soporte vital en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Aspectos técnicos y prácticos a considerar.

The scientific and technical developments in medicine in the recent decades have greatly helped to increase life expectancy and quality of life of many patients. In hospitals, this technological scenario has clearly influenced patient care, for example, in the Intensive Medicine Departments, leading to new clinical perspectives and has made the growing complexity of giving treatment and making decisions more evident. In some cases, it is difficult to predict how beneficial intensive medical care can be when there is no reasonable prospect of improving the patient's health, prolonging their life in situations with poor prognosis or dramatically reducing their quality of life. The clinical diagnosis of irreversibility, through indicators of severity and principles of beneficence, autonomy and justice in the professional conduct are the elements that give rise to the consideration of withholding and withdrawing treatment in the critical patient. However, there are other factors that need to be taken into consideration and that are analyzed by professional ethics and bioethics. It is from this approach that any decision involving withholding and withdrawing treatment should be taken so that these decisions can be considered estimable form an ethical point of view. The nursing professional in intensive care units is expected to actively participate in decision making by contributing with their humanizing vision and care ethics. They should be aware of their contribution in the medical team behaving, representing and encouraging the requirements of bioethics.

La enfermera frente a la limitación del tratamiento de soporte vital en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Aspectos técnicos y prácticos a considerar / The nursing profession regarding limitation of life support treatment in the Intensive Care Units. Technical and practical features

Los avances científicos y técnicos de las últimas décadas en el campo sanitario han ayudadoa aumentar la supervivencia de muchos enfermos mejorando su calidad de vida. Enel ámbito hospitalario, este escenario tecnológico ha influenciado de manera clara laatención de los pacientes, como en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva, planteándosenuevas perspectivas clínicas y evidenciándose la creciente complejidad del abordaje terapéuticoy la toma de decisiones. En ocasiones es difícil prever el grado de beneficio quepuede comportar la Medicina Intensiva cuando no hay expectativas razonables de mejoradel estado de salud, prolongando la vida en situaciones con un pronóstico nefasto o grandeterioro de la calidad de vida. El diagnóstico clínico de irreversibilidad, a través de indicadoresde gravedad, y los principios de beneficencia, autonomía y justicia en la actuaciónprofesional son los elementos que originan la situación de considerar la limitacióndel tratamiento de soporte vital (LTSV) en el enfermo crítico. Sin embargo, hay otrosfactores que deben considerarse y que son analizados por la bioética y la ética profesional.A través de este prisma deberían tomarse las decisiones de LTSV para que estas seajustaran a lo estimable desde un punto de vista ético.Se espera de la enfermera de intensivos que participe de forma activa en la toma dedecisiones aportando la visión humanizadora de los cuidados y la ética del cuidar. Estadebe ser consciente de su aportación en el seno del equipo, actuando, representando yfomentando los requerimientos que defiende el diálogo bioético(AU)

The scientific and technical developments in medicine in the recent decades have greatlyhelped to increase life expectancy and quality of life of many patients. In hospitals, thistechnological scenario has clearly influenced patient care, for example, in the IntensiveMedicine Departments, leading to new clinical perspectives and has made the growingcomplexity of giving treatment and making decisions more evident. In some cases, it isdifficult to predict how beneficial intensive medical care can be when there is noreasonable prospect of improving the patient’s health, prolonging their life in situationswith poor prognosis or dramatically reducing their quality of life. The clinical diagnosisof irreversibility, through indicators of severity and principles of beneficence, autonomyand justice in the professional conduct are the elements that give rise to the considerationof withholding and withdrawing treatment in the critical patient. However, there areother factors that need to be taken into consideration and that are analyzed byprofessional ethics and bioethics. It is from this approach that any decision involvingwithholding and withdrawing treatment should be taken so that these decisions can beconsidered estimable form an ethical point of view.The nursing professional in intensive care units is expected to actively participate indecision making by contributing with their humanizing vision and care ethics. They shouldbe aware of their contribution in the medical team behaving, representing and encouragingthe requirements of bioethics(AU)