Wave intensity analysis of maternal arterial stiffness: augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in pregnancies complicated by diabetes or hypertension.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the maternal arterial stiffness in pregnant women with diabetic disease, hypertension and those with normal pregnancies. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed involving 65 pregnant women with diabetic disease (DD group), 26 pregnant women with hypertension (RR group) and 448 women with normal pregnancies (control group). The augmentation index (AIx) and the pulse wave velocity (PWV) of the right carotid artery were assessed using non-invasive sonographic wave intensity analysis. Furthermore, the reliability of the measurements was evaluated in 21 healthy women. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, the AIx and PWV were increased in the DD group [11.0 (interquartile range, IQR 7.3, 15.2) vs. 5.7 (IQR 2.4, 9.3), P < 0.001; 5.7 (IQR 5.1, 6.4) vs. 5.2 (IQR 4.6, 6.1), P = 0.001; respectively] and the RR group [9.3 (IQR 6.6, 11.5) vs. 5.7 (IQR 2.4, 9.3), P < 0.001; 7.1 (6.3, 7.9) vs. 5.2 (IQR 4.6, 6.1), P < 0.001; respectively]. The intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients were good to excellent for the AIx (ICC: 0.91, P < 0.001 and 0.74, P < 0.002; respectively) and PWV measurements (ICC: 0.71, P < 0.004 and 0.70, P < 0.005; respectively). CONCLUSION: Pregnancies complicated by diabetic disease or hypertension are associated with increased maternal arterial stiffness. The importance of wave intensity analysis needs to be verified and larger studies are needed to establish both normal and cutoff values that may be relevant for clinical decisions.

Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate normal uterine tissue with special regard to age and the presence of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis with transvaginal elastography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study elastographic data of the uterus were obtained in 206 unselected women with transvaginal ultrasound. Women who presented without any uterine pathology in ultrasonography were included in a control group, women with uterine fibroids in a uterine fibroid group, and women with adenomyosis in an adenomyosis group. In the control group strain values were measured at two regions of interest (ROIs) placed one upon the other in the anterior inferior uterine segment during a cycle of compression. The maximum strain ratio (ROI1 / ROI2) was stored as the "age index". In all groups strain values were measured at two ROIs placed side by side in a uterine fibroid (uterine fibroid group) or adenomyosis (adenomyosis group) or healthy homogeneous tissue (control group) and adjacent healthy tissue. Maximum strain ratios (ROI3 / ROI4) were stored as the "lesion index". RESULTS: The "age index" was significantly negatively correlated with the age of the women (r = -0.49, p < 0.001). The median "lesion indices" were significantly (p < 0.001) different between the uterine fibroid, adenomyosis and control groups. Median "lesion indices" were 2.65, 0.44 and 1.19, respectively. CONCLUSION: The "age index" shows that normal uterine tissue has a certain age-dependent stiffness that increases with age. The "lesion index" allows for the assessment of the presence of a uterine fibroid or adenomyosis and helps to differentiate between both focal findings. Thus the use of elastography in addition to conventional ultrasound could help to diagnose uterine focal lesions and may be useful in preoperative planning.

Disinfection of transvaginal ultrasound probes in a clinical setting: comparative performance of automated and manual reprocessing methods.

OBJECTIVES: Transvaginal and intracavitary ultrasound probes are a possible source of cross-contamination with microorganisms and thus a risk to patients' health. Therefore appropriate methods for reprocessing are needed. This study was designed to compare the standard disinfection method for transvaginal ultrasound probes in Germany with an automated disinfection method in a clinical setting. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled clinical study of two groups. In each group, 120 microbial samples were collected from ultrasound transducers before and after disinfection with either an automated method (Trophon EPR®) or a manual method (Mikrozid Sensitive® wipes). Samples were then analyzed for microbial growth and isolates were identified to species level. RESULTS: Automated disinfection had a statistically significantly higher success rate of 91.4% (106/116) compared with 78.8% (89/113) for manual disinfection (P = 0.009). The risk of contamination was increased by 2.9-fold when disinfection was performed manually (odds ratio, 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.3)). Before disinfection, bacterial contamination was observed on 98.8% of probes. Microbial analysis revealed 36 different species of bacteria, including skin and environmental bacteria as well as pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high number of contaminated probes and bacterial species found, disinfection of the ultrasound probe's body and handle should be performed after each use to decrease the risk of cross-contamination. This study favored automated disinfection owing to its significantly higher efficacy compared with a manual method. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.