CHaMP: A Model for Building a Center to Support Health Care Worker Well-Being After Experiencing an Adverse Event.

BACKGROUND: With an already distressed health care workforce demonstrating high levels of burnout, depression, and suicide, access to behavioral health care, particularly after an adverse event, is critical. Unfortunately, clinicians identify multiple barriers to seeking behavioral support. In 2022 the National Academy of Medicine, in its National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being, established "Support Mental Health and Reduce Stigma" as one of its seven priority areas. FRAMEWORK: The authors developed a program called CHaMP (Center for Healthy Minds and Practice) guided by a multidisciplinary task force that developed the vision, plan, and algorithms to improve crisis response; build a peer support program; and remove barriers to accessing mental health care by establishing an on-campus behavioral health support center. This program was implemented using Kotter's 8-step Model of Change. RESULTS: Within the first months of establishing this program, the support team responded to multiple activations of the crisis response plan, built a peer support program, and provided counseling services to 631 employees. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CHaMP played a central role in the support of all employees. CONCLUSION: This program and its implementation based on Kotter's 8-Step Model of Change was a powerful and practical methodology to design and implement interventions to address system and individual factors that affect clinician well-being and resilience after an adverse event.

Child Psychiatry Consultation Clinic for Pediatricians: Long-Term Outcomes.

There is an urgent need for new clinical models to improve access to child mental health care. Pediatricians are tasked to care for youth with mild to moderate mental health problems, but require additional training. This article describes an outpatient child psychiatry consultation clinic (CPC) designed to empower pediatricians to care for youth with depression, anxiety, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Over a 2-year period, 40 primary care physicians (PCPs) referred 159 patients to the CPC. The most common primary diagnoses of patients seen for consultation were generalized anxiety disorder (35%), major depressive disorder (24%), and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (20%). Most patients (89%) had at least 2 psychiatric diagnoses. Nearly four fifths (79%) of these patients successfully returned to their PCP for ongoing care. PCPs reported that the CPC enhanced their skills and improved access to mental health care. Similar models are needed to facilitate early intervention for the millions of youth with mental health problems.

Post-Parkland Shooting: Development and Assessment of Experiential Training in Adolescent Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for Primary Care Providers.

Primary care pediatric providers (PCPs) could facilitate early intervention for youth impacted by trauma, yet lack appropriate training. Experiential training for PCPs following a school shooting helped improve PCP confidence and practices in caring for youth with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Impact of Experiential Training With Standardized Patients on Screening and Diagnosis of Adolescent Depression in Primary Care.

PURPOSE: Primary care providers (PCPs) report inadequate training in depression care. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term impact of PCP training with standardized patients on screening and diagnosis of adolescent depression in primary care. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical and billing records for adolescent (aged 12-18 years) well-visits assessed the frequency of screening and new diagnoses of depression. Twenty-five PCPs participated in training. The study included all adolescent well-visits in the 12 months before and after PCP training. Adolescents with a previous diagnosis of depression were excluded from the sample. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to assess associations with screening. Odds ratios were used to describe the magnitude of associations. RESULTS: The analysis included 7,108 well-visits for adolescents (mean age 14.5 years, standard deviation 1.7 years; gender: 52% male; race: 65% white, 13% black, 22% other races; ethnicity: 25% Hispanic; insurance: 67% commercial). Depression screening rate increased significantly after training from 51% to 80% of adolescents seen at well-visits (adjusted odds ratio 40.8, 95% confidence interval 32.6-51.0, p < .0001). Although the likelihood of being screened for depression increased post-training, there was variation based on patient's insurance. A significantly greater percentage of adolescents were newly diagnosed with depression after training (2.22% vs. .89%, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: PCPs who participated in experiential training using standardized patients were more likely to screen for and diagnose adolescent depression in the 12 months after training. Future studies are needed to examine the effects of PCP training on patient outcomes.

The Brief Early Childhood Screening Assessment: Preliminary Validity in Pediatric Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: Brief, well-validated instruments are needed to facilitate screening for early childhood behavioral and emotional problems (BEPs). The objectives of this study were to empirically reduce the length of the Early Childhood Screening Assessment (ECSA) and to assess the validity and reliability of this shorter tool. METHODS: Using caregiver ECSA responses for 2467 children aged 36 to 60 months seen in primary care, individual ECSA items were ranked on a scale ranging from "absolutely retain" to "absolutely delete." Items were deleted sequentially beginning with "absolutely delete" and going up the item prioritization list, resulting in 35 shorter versions of the ECSA. A separate primary care sample (n = 69) of mothers of children aged 18 to 60 months was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each shorter ECSA version using psychiatric diagnosis on the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment as the gold standard. The version with the optimal balance of sensitivity, specificity, and length was selected as the Brief ECSA. Associations between Brief ECSA scores and other pertinent measures were evaluated to estimate reliability and validity. RESULTS: A 22-item measure reflected the best combination of brevity, sensitivity and specificity. A cutoff score of 9 or higher on the 22-item Brief ECSA demonstrated acceptable sensitivity (89%) and specificity (85%) for predicting a psychiatric diagnosis. Brief ECSA scores correlated significantly and in expected directions with scores on pertinent measures and with demographic variables. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the Brief ECSA has sound psychometric properties for identifying young children with BEPs in primary care.

Feasibility of Screening for Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Primary Care Using the Early Childhood Screening Assessment.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening young children for behavioral and emotional problems (BEP) during primary care visits. Because of time constraints, few primary care providers (PCPs) use standardized screening tools to detect BEP. The Early Childhood Screening Assessment (ECSA) is a brief screening tool developed specifically to meet the needs of pediatric primary care providers (PCPs). The ECSA has established psychometric properties, but the feasibility and acceptability of the ECSA have not been established. This study examines the degree to which PCPs would incorporate ECSA screening and how PCPs value the ECSA as a tool to detect children with BEP. Twenty-seven pediatric PCPs were trained to implement ECSA screening. Six months after training, 96% of PCPs reported that the ECSA was practical for use at well-visits, 70% were still screening and 89% agreed that it helped detect more cases of BEP than by routine history-taking alone.

Collaborative Care: a Pilot Study of a Child Psychiatry Outpatient Consultation Model for Primary Care Providers.

A Child Psychiatry Consultation Model (CPCM) offering primary care providers (PCPs) expedited access to outpatient child psychiatric consultation regarding management in primary care would allow more children to access mental health services. Yet, little is known about outpatient CPCMs. This pilot study describes an outpatient CPCM for 22 PCPs in a large Northeast Florida county. PCPs referred 81 patients, of which 60 were appropriate for collaborative management and 49 were subsequently seen for outpatient psychiatric consultation. The most common psychiatric diagnoses following consultation were anxiety (57%), ADHD (53%), and depression (39%). Over half (57%) of the patients seen for consultation were discharged to their PCP with appropriate treatment recommendations, and only a small minority (10%) of patients required long-term care by a psychiatrist. This CPCM helped child psychiatrists collaborate with PCPs to deliver mental health services for youth. The CPCM should be considered for adaptation and dissemination.

Primary care provider training in screening, assessment, and treatment of adolescent depression.

OBJECTIVE: Adolescent depression is underrecognized and undertreated. Primary care providers (PCP) require training to successfully identify adolescents with depression. We examined the effects of a PCP training program in the screening, assessment, and treatment of adolescent depression (SAT-D) on adolescents' reports of PCP screening for adolescent depression at annual well visits and PCP SAT-D confidence and knowledge. METHODS: PCP (n = 31) attended one SAT-D training program consisting of a 60-minute SAT-D seminar and a 60-minute standardized patient session where PCP practiced SAT-D skills. A pre-post design evaluated effects of training on PCP depression screening practices as reported by 3 groups of adolescent patients at well visits (n = 582 before, n = 525 at 2 to 8 months after training, n = 208 at 18 to 24 months after training). A generalized linear mixed effects logistic regression controlled for provider and patient demographics that may have influenced depression screening. PCP SAT-D self-reported confidence and objectively tested knowledge were assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and at 4 to 6 months after training. RESULTS: On the basis of the regression analysis, PCP screening for adolescent depression increased significantly from pretraining (49%) to 2 to 8 months after training (68%, odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 2.10-3.68) and 18 to 24 months after training (74%, odds ratio 3.17, 95% confidence interval 2.16-4.67; both P < .0001). PCP SAT-D confidence and knowledge also significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: PCP SAT-D training resulted in significant increases in primary care screening for adolescent depression that were maintained up to 24 months after training. Future studies should determine if changes in PCP screening improve identification of adolescent depression and patient outcomes for adolescents with depression.

Use of a standardized patient paradigm to enhance proficiency in risk assessment for adolescent depression and suicide.

PURPOSE: Although routine adolescent depression and suicide risk assessment (ADSRA) is recommended, primary care physician (PCP) ADSRA training is needed for successful ADSRA implementation. This study examined the effect of an intervention using standardized patients (SPs) on PCP ADSRA confidence, knowledge, and practices. METHODS: The intervention consisted of a 60-minute seminar followed by a 60-minute SP session to practice ADSRA skills in simulated clinical situations. INTERVENTION: PCPs (n = 46) completed pre- and postintervention assessments. Untrained PCPs interested in the intervention (n = 58) also completed assessments. Assessments evaluated ADSRA self-reported confidence and practices and objectively assessed knowledge. The main outcomes were (1) changes in pre-/postintervention PCP ADSRA confidence and knowledge, and (2) ADSRA practices in untrained versus postintervention PCPs. RESULTS: Compared with untrained PCPs, PCPs 5-10 months postintervention were more likely to screen most adolescents for depression (40% vs. 22%, p = .05), to use a depression screening tool (50% vs. 19%, p = .001), to have diagnosed at least one adolescent with depression in the past 3 months (96% vs. 78%, p = .013), and to have screened depressed adolescents for suicide risk factors, including access to weapons (51% vs. 25%; p = .007) or an impulsive violence history (27% vs. 11%; p = .037). PCP confidence and knowledge about depression assessment and treatment also significantly improved postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of an SP intervention to improve PCP ADSRA confidence, knowledge, and practices. Widespread implementation of similar educational efforts has the potential to dramatically improve adolescent morbidity and mortality.

Teaching pediatric residents to assess adolescent suicide risk with a standardized patient module.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a suicide risk assessment (SRA) training module incorporating standardized patients (SPs) would enhance pediatric resident SRA performance. METHODS: We conducted an educational survey of pediatric residents regarding SRA (N = 80). In addition, we tested the performance of a SRA training module among pediatric interns who received SRA practice with SPs simulating suicidality scenarios, with (n = 6) or without (n = 6) SRA lecture, or SRA lecture only (n = 12) and control interns (n = 10). We examined postintervention confidence in SRA and self-reported and objectively measured knowledge of suicidal risk factors. RESULTS: Resident confidence and knowledge regarding SRA were low, compared with assessment of medical illness. Interns in the SP plus lecture group had significantly greater confidence in screening adolescents for suicide risk factors and assessing suicidal adolescents (screening, 4.2 +/- 0.4; assessing, 4.2 +/- 0.4), compared with subjects in either the lecture-only (screening, 2.9 +/- 0.8; P = .005; assessing, 2.9 +/- 1.1; P = .01) or control (screening, 3.1 +/- 0.7; P = .025; assessing, 2.6 +/- 0.8; P = .003) group. In addition, only the SP plus lecture group demonstrated significantly greater objective knowledge of suicide risk factors (92% vs 25% correct; P = .008) than the control group. Neither the lecture-only group nor the SP-only group was significantly better than the control group in terms of knowledge or confidence relevant to SRA. CONCLUSION: This SRA training module was significantly more effective than lecture alone in enhancing pediatric intern knowledge and confidence in SRA.