Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865009

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The study aims to investigate the relationship among social support, health behavior self-efficacy, anxiety, and the physical activity (PA) levels of lung cancer survivors, and to analyze whether health behavior self-efficacy and anxiety mediate the relationship between social support and PA levels. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 1128 lung cancer survivors from 16 Chinese hospitals, we collected demographic data and administered the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Scale (SRAHP), Anxiety Scale (AS), and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). SPSS 25.0 was used for descriptive analyses, while the structural equation model in SPSS AMOS 24.0 was used to identify the direct, indirect, and total effects among variables. RESULTS: There were significant correlations among SSRS, SRAHP, AS, and PA (P < 0.01). Model outcomes revealed a positive association between social support and health behavior self-efficacy (ß = 0.732, P < 0.001). Health behavior self-efficacy positively correlated with PA levels (ß = 0.228, P < 0.001) and negatively with anxiety (ß=-0.252, P = 0.001). Moreover, health behavior self-efficacy was found to partially mediate the relationship between social support and PA (ß = 0.174, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This study revealed a positive correlation between social support and health behavior self-efficacy, and between health behavior self-efficacy and PA levels among lung cancer survivors. Additionally, health behavior self-efficacy mediated the relationship between social support and PA levels. In future clinical practice, medical and nursing staff should assess social support and health behavior self-efficacy in lung cancer survivors to inform personalized PA interventions.

2.
Ann Palliat Med ; 12(3): 561-570, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37211785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unplanned extubation is a common adverse event and an important indicator of quality and safety of care. It is well recognized that the incidence of unplanned extubation of nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes is higher than that of other devices. Theory and previous research have suggested that cognitive bias in conscious patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes may lead to unplanned extubation, and that social support, anxiety, and hope are influencing factors of cognitive bias. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of social support, anxiety, and hope levels on cognitive bias in patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 438 patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes were selected from 16 hospitals in Suzhou from December 2019 to March 2022 by convenience sampling method. The participants were assessed using the General Information Questionnaire, Perceived Social Support Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Herth Hope Index, and Cognitive Bias Questionnaire for patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes. The structural equation model was established with AMOS 22.0 software. RESULTS: The cognitive bias score of patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes was 2.82±0.61. Patients' perceived levels of social support and hope were negatively correlated with their cognitive bias (r=-0.395 and -0.427, respectively, P<0.05), and anxiety was positively correlated with cognitive bias (r=0.446, P<0.05). Structural equation model analysis showed that anxiety had a direct positive effect on cognitive bias, with an effect value of 0.35 (P<0.001), and hope level had a direct negative effect on cognitive bias with an effect value of -0.33 (P<0.001). Social support had a direct negative effect on cognitive bias and was also shown to indirectly affect cognitive bias through anxiety and hope levels. The effect values were -0.22, -0.12, and -0.19 (P<0.001), for social support, anxiety, and hope, respectively. Social support, anxiety, and hope explained 46.2% of the total variation in cognitive bias. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate cognitive bias is noted in patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes, and social support significantly affects cognitive bias. Anxiety and hope level play a mediating role in social support and cognitive bias. Positive psychological intervention and the obtention of positive support could improve the cognitive bias of patients with nasogastric/nasoenteric tubes.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade , Ansiedade , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Ansiedade/etiologia , Apoio Social , Cognição
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...