Perampanel as an Add-On Therapy in Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus and Postanoxic Encephalopathy: A Real-Life Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of perampanel in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and postanoxic encephalopathy (PAE) are limited; its use in such conditions is currently off-label. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with RSE, including PAE, exhibiting electroencephalographic patterns indicative of status epilepticus who were treated at our center (January 2018 to December 2022) with assessment of clinical and electroencephalographic outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in the study, of whom 29 had nonanoxic RSE and 7 had PAE. Within the nonanoxic RSE subgroup, 45% (13 of 29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-63%) of study participants were responders, 34% (10 of 29; 95% CI 17-52%) were partial responders, and 21% (6 of 29; 95% CI 6-35%) were nonresponders. In the PAE subgroup (n = 7), no patients fully responded to perampanel; 43% (3 of 7; 95% CI 6-80%) were partial responders, and 57% (4 of 7; 95% CI 20-95%) were nonresponders. Responder and nonresponder study participants exhibited overlapping baseline characteristics. No significant differences in duration of hospitalization were observed between responders and nonresponders in both subgroups. Responders in the RSE subgroup had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 3 (interquartile range 3-4), and nonresponders had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 5 (interquartile range 5-6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations from the retrospective design and the small population size, this study suggests that perampanel use in nonanoxic RSE appears to yield promising results at moderate doses, including a tendency toward a better functional outcome at discharge, without significant adverse effects. However, in patients with PAE, the drug seems to show suboptimal performance. Perampanel appears to have promising efficacy as an add-on therapy in nonanoxic RSE. However, in patients with PAE, its efficacy seems to be lower. Further studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Predictors of seizure detection and EEG clinical impact in an italian tertiary emergency department.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epileptic seizures pose challenges in emergency departments (ED), affecting up to 10% of admitted patients. This study aimed to assess emergency electroencephalogram (EmEEG) utilization, identifying factors predicting seizure detection and its influence on clinical decisions. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1135 EmEEGs on 1017 patients at a tertiary teaching hospital between June 2022 and June 2023 was conducted. Data included demographics, medical history, EmEEG indications, neuroimaging findings, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses utilized Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression models. RESULTS: EmEEG detected status epilepticus-related seizures in 5.40% of cases, seizures without status epilepticus in 3.05%, and status epilepticus without discrete seizures in 3.74%. Epileptiform abnormalities were noted in 22.12% of EmEEGs. EmEEG influenced initial diagnoses (21.24%), antiseizure medication changes (20.85%), and discharge decisions (39.04%). Predictors for seizures/status epilepticus included previous neurosurgery, seizures in the ED, and cognitive/behavioral impairment (p < 0.001). EmEEG significantly altered initial diagnoses based on witnessed seizures, involuntary movements, epileptiform abnormalities, and 1-2 Hz generalized periodic discharges (p < 0.001). Changes in antiseizure medications correlated with seizure occurrence, neuroimaging results, epileptiform abnormalities, and EEG background slowing (p < 0.001). Factors influencing discharge decisions included previous neurosurgery, consciousness impairment, acute neuroimaging pathology, EEG focal slowing, and EEG background slowing (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The study clarifies EmEEG's role in modifying initial diagnoses, treatment approaches, and discharge decisions. The study provides insights into the nuanced impact of EmEEG in different clinical scenarios, offering valuable guidance for clinicians in selecting patients for EmEEG, particularly in conditions of limited EEG availability.

EEG Correlates in the 3 Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The 3 clinical presentations of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) reflect heterogenous neuropathology, which is difficult to be recognized in vivo. Resting-state (RS) EEG is promising for the investigation of brain electrical substrates in neurodegenerative conditions. In this study, we aim to explore EEG cortical sources in the characterization of the 3 variants of PPA. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, single-center, memory center-based cohort study. Patients with PPA and healthy controls were consecutively recruited at the Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Milan, Italy). Each participant underwent an RS 19-channel EEG. Using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography, EEG current source densities were estimated at voxel level and compared among study groups. Using an RS functional MRI-driven model of source reconstruction, linear lagged connectivity (LLC) values within language and extra-language brain networks were obtained and analyzed among groups. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with logopenic PPA variant (lvPPA; mean age = 72.7 ± 6.6; % female = 52.4), 21 patients with nonfluent/agrammatic PPA variant (nfvPPA; mean age = 71.7 ± 8.1; % female = 66.6), and 9 patients with semantic PPA variant (svPPA; mean age = 65.0 ± 6.9; % female = 44.4) were enrolled in the study, together with 21 matched healthy controls (mean age = 69.2 ± 6.5; % female = 57.1). Patients with lvPPA showed a higher delta density than healthy controls (p < 0.01) and patients with nfvPPA (p < 0.05) and svPPA (p < 0.05). Patients with lvPPA also displayed a greater theta density over the left posterior hemisphere (p < 0.01) and lower alpha2 values (p < 0.05) over the left frontotemporal regions than controls. Patients with nfvPPA showed a diffuse greater theta density than controls (p < 0.05). LLC was altered in all patients relative to controls (p < 0.05); the alteration was greater at slow frequency bands and within language networks than extra-language networks. Patients with lvPPA also showed greater LLC values at theta band than patients with nfvPPA (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: EEG findings in patients with PPA suggest that lvPPA-related pathology is associated with a characteristic disruption of the cortical electrical activity, which might help in the differential diagnosis from svPPA and nfvPPA. EEG connectivity was disrupted in all PPA variants, with distinct findings in disease-specific PPA groups. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that EEG analysis can distinguish PPA due to probable Alzheimer disease from PPA due to probable FTD from normal aging.

Expanding the spectrum of neonatal-onset AIFM1-associated disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Pathogenic variants in AIFM1 have been associated with a wide spectrum of disorders, spanning from CMT4X to mitochondrial encephalopathy. Here we present a novel phenotype and review the existing literature on AIFM1-related disorders. METHODS: We performed EEG recordings, brain MRI and MR Spectroscopy, metabolic screening, echocardiogram, clinical exome sequencing (CES) and family study. Effects of the variant were established on cultured fibroblasts from skin punch biopsy. RESULTS: The patient presented with drug-resistant, electro-clinical, multifocal seizures 6 h after birth. Brain MRI revealed prominent brain swelling of both hemispheres and widespread signal alteration in large part of the cortex and of the thalami, with sparing of the basal nuclei. CES analysis revealed the likely pathogenic variant c.5T>C; p.(Phe2Ser) in the AIFM1 gene. The affected amino acid residue is located in the mitochondrial targeting sequence. Functional studies on cultured fibroblast showed a clear reduction in AIFM1 protein amount and defective activities of respiratory chain complexes I, III and IV. No evidence of protein mislocalization or accumulation of precursor protein was observed. Riboflavin, Coenzyme Q10 and thiamine supplementation was therefore given. At 6 months of age, the patient exhibited microcephaly but did not experience any further deterioration. He is still fed orally and there is no evidence of muscle weakness or atrophy. INTERPRETATION: This is the first AIFM1 case associated with neonatal seizures and diffuse white matter involvement with relative sparing of basal ganglia, in the absence of clinical signs suggestive of myopathy or motor neuron disease.

Interstitial 6q deletion in a patient presenting with drug-resistant epilepsy and Prader-Willi like phenotype: An electroclinical description with literature review.

PURPOSE: Interstitial 6q deletions are associated with rare genetic syndromes characterized by different signs, including developmental delay, dysmorphisms, and Prader-Willi (PWS)-like features. Drug-resistant epilepsy, a relatively rare finding in this condition, is often a challenge in terms of therapeutic approach. Our aim is to present a new case of interstitial 6q deletion and to conduct a systematic review of the literature with an emphasis on the neurophysiological and clinical traits of afflicted individuals. METHODS: We report a patient with an interstitial 6q deletion. Standard electroencephalograms (EEG), video-EEG with polygraphy and MRI features are discussed. We also conducted a literature review of previously described cases. RESULTS: We describe a relatively small interstitial 6q deletion (2 Mb circa), detected by CGH-Array, not encompassing the previously described 6q22 critical region for epilepsy occurrence. The patient, a 12-year-old girl, presented with multiple absence-like episodes and startle-induced epileptic spasms since the age of 11, with partial polytherapy control. Treatment with lamotrigine induced the resolution of startle-induced phenomena. From the literature review, we identified 28 patients with overlapping deletions, often larger than our patient's mutation. Seventeen patients presented with PWS-like features. Epilepsy was reported in 4 patients, and 8 patients presented abnormal EEG findings. In our patient, the deletion included genes MCHR2, SIM1, ASCC3, and GRIK2, but, interestingly, it did not encompass the 6q22 critical region for epilepsy occurrence. The involvement of GRIK2 in the deletion may play a role. CONCLUSION: Literature data are limited, and specific EEG or epileptological phenotypes cannot yet be identified. Epilepsy, although uncommon in the syndrome, deserves a specific diagnostic workup. We speculate on the existence of an additional locus in the 6q16.1-q21 region, different from the already hypothesized q22, promoting the development of epilepsy in affected patients.