Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 35(7): 1130-1135, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31734958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A well-validated, comprehensive checklist of functional gastrointestinal (FGI) disorder (FGID) symptom severity for tracking symptom profile changes over time is lacking. We aim to develop and validate a comprehensive symptom severity checklist for FGID. METHODS: A 20-item scale, including both upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms, was generated to measure the symptom severity commonly found in FGID. Patients who experienced at least monthly symptoms of FGID with negative endoscopy findings were invited to complete the FGI-Checklist, Patient Health Questionaire-9 for assessing depressive symptoms, and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 for assessing somatic symptoms at baseline. A subset of patients who met Rome III diagnostic criteria of gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome received medication treatment for 8-12 weeks and completed the FGI-Checklist again at a follow-up visit. Exploratory factor analysis was performed for subscales formation and psychometric properties were measured. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-one patients were recruited for current study and 108 (16.8%) of them completed the FGI-Checklist again at follow-up. Exploratory factor analysis identified a five-factor solution accounting for 66.8% of the total variance. The five factors are named esophageal syndrome, reflux syndrome, functional dyspepsia syndrome, nausea and vomiting syndrome, and abdominal and bowel syndrome. The FGI-Checklist total score correlated with Patient Health Questionaire-9 and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (all P < 0.001), which demonstrated good construct validity. Good item-internal consistency was found (Cronbach's alphas: 0.69-0.87). Responsiveness for reflux syndrome subscale, functional dyspepsia syndrome subscale, and abdominal and bowel syndrome subscale after medication treatment was significant (paired-t-test: all P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The instrument, Checklist, is valid and reliable.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Gastroenteropatias/fisiopatologia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Adulto , Dispepsia , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/psicologia , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome
2.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 31(10): e13681, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31386263

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We previously published that altered expression of gastric TRPV1, BDNF, and peripheral cytokines was present in patients with functional dyspepsia. We herein examine whether genetic predisposition in altered biomarkers influences dyspeptic, sleep, and mood symptoms in patients with FD without previous infection. METHODS: Consecutive adult FD patients (Rome III) with no recent history of gastroenteritis and asymptomatic age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for upper endoscopy. Subjects with GERD and IBS as predominant symptoms, diabetes mellitus, current or previous H pylori infection, psychiatric illness, and recent use of NSAID or PPI were excluded. The genetic associations with dyspeptic symptoms, sleep quality, and mood symptoms were evaluated. Genetic polymorphisms in TRPV1, TGFB1, TNF, COMT, BDNF, IL6, IL8, IL10, and IL12 were analyzed. KEY RESULTS: Twenty-nine male FD patients and 104 female FD patients were age matched (±3 years) with 81 healthy subjects. All had postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) as predominant subtype (PDS: 130, EPS: 3). SNPs in TGFB1 showed significant associations in dyspeptic patients after age and sex adjustment [for RS4803455: in the codominant model (C/A, OR = 0.34 (0.18-0.65), P = .004); in the dominant model (genotype C/C vs C/A-A/A, OR = 0.42 (0.23-0.77), P = .004); and in the overdominant model (genotype C/C-A/A vs C/A, OR = 0.38 (0.21-0.70), P < .001)] [for RS1800469: in dominant model (genotype A/A vs A/G-G/G, OR = 0.52 (0.27-0.99), P = .043)]. A allele in RS4803455 was associated with higher HADS depression score (P = .05) and epigastric burning sensation(P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our data showed that dyspeptic patients predispose genetic difference in TGFB1 which may influence the severity of dyspepsia.


Assuntos
Dispepsia/genética , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta1/genética , Adulto , Povo Asiático/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China , Dispepsia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...