Clinical Evaluation of the Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Specific Quantitative IgG and IgM Assays among Infected, Recovered, and Vaccinated Groups.

The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to impose a significant burden on global health infrastructure. While identification and containment of new cases remain important, laboratories must now pivot and consider an assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunity in the setting of the recent availability of multiple COVID-19 vaccines. Here, we have utilized the latest Abbott Alinity semiquantitative IgM and quantitative IgG spike protein (SP) serology assays (IgMSP and IgGSP) in combination with Abbott Alinity IgG nucleocapsid (NC) antibody test (IgGNC) to assess antibody responses in a cohort of 1,236 unique participants comprised of naive, SARS-CoV-2-infected, and vaccinated (including both naive and recovered) individuals. The IgMSP and IgGSP assays were highly specific (100%) with no cross-reactivity to archived samples collected prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, including those from individuals with seasonal coronavirus infections. Clinical sensitivity was 96% after 15 days for both IgMSP and IgGSP assays individually. When considered together, the sensitivity was 100%. A combination of NC- and SP-specific serologic assays clearly differentiated naive, SARS-CoV-2-infected, and vaccine-related immune responses. Vaccination resulted in a significant increase in IgGSP and IgMSP values, with a major rise in IgGSP following the booster (second) dose in the naive group. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2-recovered individuals had several-fold higher IgGSP responses than naive following the primary dose, with a comparatively dampened response following the booster. This work illustrates the strong clinical performance of these new serological assays and their utility in evaluating and distinguishing serological responses to infection and vaccination.

Assessment of Risk for Interference by Circulating Biotin in Samples Received for High Sensitivity Troponin-T, Thyrotropin, and for Prostate Specific Antigen Testing by Immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Biotin interference in streptavidin-based immunoassays is known and may lead to erroneous results and thus to diagnostic error. The recent increase in reports of biotin interference in immunoassay-based testing has been attributed to increased intake of biotin supplements by the public and to the high dose biotin therapy in patients with neurological and inherited disorders. Circulating biotin levels greater than 20 ng/mL are reported to exhibit interference in high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), and in prostate specific antigen (PSA) among other assays when using our Cobas® 6000 immunoassay analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, IN, USA). This study aims to examine the risk for biotin interference among our patient population. METHODS: Serum and plasma leftover samples from 183 different patients were collected following completion of hs-TnT (53 samples), TSH (45 samples), and PSA (85 samples) testing. Aliquots were stored frozen at -20°C until analysis. Biotin concentrations in these samples were measured using an ELISA (ALPCO, Salem, NH, USA) according to the manufacture's protocol. Samples with biotin levels of 20 ng/mL or greater were considered as high-risk samples (HRS) for biotin interference. RESULTS: The overall concentrations of biotin in our patients' samples ranged from 0.02 ng/mL to 11.38 ng/mL (median 0.42 ng/mL). The median and (range) biotin concentrations in hs-TnT, TSH, and PSA samples were 0.27 ng/mL (0.02 - 6.86 ng/mL), 0.39 ng/mL (0.08 - 11.38 ng/mL), and 0.47 ng/mL (0.09 - 7.73 ng/mL), respectively. Although there was no significant difference between biotin levels in samples for TSH or PSA measurement (p = 0.85), biotin in samples for PSA and for hs-TnT and in samples for TSH and hs-TnT were significantly different (p = 0.049 and 0.089), respectively. None of the samples had biotin levels greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Using representative samples with requests for hs-TnT, TSH, and PSA testing, where reliable performance for the selected assays at their lowest measurement range is required for clinical intervention, among our study population the risk was considered minimal as their circulating biotin levels were less than 20 ng/mL. However, educating clinicians and laboratory users regarding the potential of biotin interference is always recommended.