Randomised comparison of percutaneous left ventricular assist device with open-chest cardiac massage and with surgical assist device during ischaemic cardiac arrest.

AIMS: A percutaneous left ventricular assist device can maintain blood flow to vital organs during ventricular fibrillation and may improve outcomes in ischaemic cardiac arrest. We compared haemodynamic and clinical effects of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device with a larger device deployed via endovascular prosthesis and with open-chest cardiac massage during ischaemic cardiac arrest. METHODS: Eighteen swine were randomised into three groups. After thoracotomy, coronary ischaemia and ventricular fibrillation was induced. Cardiac output was measured with transit-time flowmetry. Tissue perfusion was measured with microspheres. Defibrillation was performed after 20 min. RESULTS: Cardiac output with cardiac massage was 1129 mL min⁻¹ vs. 1169 mL min⁻¹ with the percutaneous- and 570 mL min⁻¹ with the surgical device (P < 0.05 surgical vs. others). End-tidal CO2 was 3.3 kPa with cardiac massage vs. 3.2 kPa with the percutaneous- and 2.3 kPa with the surgical device (P < 0.05 surgical vs. others). Subepicardial perfusion was 0.33 mL min⁻¹ g⁻¹ with cardiac massage vs. 0.62 mL min⁻¹ g⁻¹ with both devices (P < 0.05 devices vs. massage), cerebral perfusion was comparable between groups (all reported values after 3 min cardiac arrest, all P<0.05 vs. baseline, all P = NS for 3 min vs. 15 min). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 5/6 subjects with cardiac massage vs. 6/6 with the percutaneous- and 4/6 with the surgical device (P = NS). CONCLUSION: The percutaneous device improved myocardial perfusion, maintained cerebral perfusion and systemic circulation with similar rates of successful defibrillation vs. cardiac massage. Increased delivery was not obtained with the surgical device during cardiac arrest.

An anaesthetic protocol in the young domestic pig allowing neuromuscular blockade for studies of cardiac function following cardioplegic arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade should, for ethical reasons, not be allowed in animal experiments unless the use is strongly motivated. Beforehand, the anaesthetic protocol must be documented without muscle relaxation in the species studied. Documentation is difficult to obtain from the scientific literature. When focusing on cardiac function over time, in particular, the ideal anaesthetic protocol should cause no or minor alterations in cardiac variables. METHODS: We intended to document an anaesthetic protocol involving ventilation with N(2)O combined with loading doses and continuous infusions of pentobarbital, fentanyl and midazolam in seven pigs by applying potentially painful stimuli every 15 min for 7 h. Subsequently, left ventricular global and regional function was studied with conductance catheter and strain rate imaging by echocardiography in eight pigs with pancuronium included. RESULTS: Pigs without pancuronium were completely immobilized and unresponsive to potentially painful stimuli and sternotomy, with no accumulation or degradation of anaesthetic agents. With pancuronium included, left ventricular preload gradually decreased together with reduction of cardiac index from 3.52 +/- 0.14 at 2 h to 2.84 +/- 0.11 L min(-1). m(-2) (+/-SEM) after 7 h of observation. Preload recruitable stroke work decreased after 7 h, whereas peak systolic strain in the anterior left ventricular wall and load-independent indices of diastolic function were not significantly altered. CONCLUSION: In specific experimental protocols, the anaesthetic protocol described could allow the use of muscular paralysis in young domestic pigs, for instance when involving hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, cardioplegic arrest and reperfusion.

[Surgical treatment of obesity. Is gastric wrapping an alternative?]. / Kirurgisk behandling av overvekt. Er gastric wrapping et alternativ?

To remedy the disabling side effects of gastric banding, a group of eleven patients were re-operated with gastric wrapping. Encouraging results led us to perform primary gastric wrapping straight away in fourteen additional patients. There were few serious complications. A comparison of the performance of the two groups is based on observations four years later. In the first group, a mean body-mass-index (BMI) of 41 +/- 4 SD was noted before banding, 32 +/- 8 SD at conversion to wrap and 31 +/- 9 SD at control. The mean BMI in the second group was reduced from 40 +/- 5 SD to 32 +/- 6 SD after primary gastric wrapping. Radiographic control showed a shortening of the wraps in both groups, with pouch formation in half of the cases, uncorrelated to weight loss. It appears that gastric wrapping can be a useful revisional procedure in patients who do not tolerate gastric banding. Primary gastric wrapping produces results comparable to those of gastric banding. Modifications in our version of gastric wrapping are discussed with reference to the original method and other surgical approaches.