Prudence in end-of-life decision making: A virtue-based analysis of physician communication with patients and surrogates.

Despite significant improvements in end-of-life care over several decades, belated hospice referrals and hospital staffing patterns make challenging end-of-life conversations between strangers unsurprising, especially when the interaction is time-sensitive. Understanding how physicians perform under these circumstances is relevant to patient quality and medical education. This study is a secondary analysis of transcripts from a simulation that placed 88 intensivists, hospitalists, and ED physicians in the setting of responding to a nurse's call to evaluate a floor patient for impending respiratory collapse. A philosophical account of prudence guided the analytical approach and was operationalized through behavior-based and exemplar-based qualitative coding strategies. Exemplary performances and specific behaviors were then compared with preferred outcomes. Results indicate that exemplary performance correlated with a cluster of 3 behaviors that predicted the desired outcomes, but did not determine them: (1) directly affirming the likelihood that the patient will die in the near term; (2) explicitly soliciting the patient's preferences for care; and (3) asking what other family and friends should be involved. The current study implies that educational initiatives aimed at improving end-of-life conversations should expose clinicians both to technical competencies and to the virtues required to employ these competencies well.

Operating room time as a limited resource: ethical considerations for allocation.

Scheduling surgical procedures among operating rooms (ORs) is mistakenly regarded as merely a tedious administrative task. However, the growing demand for surgical care and finite hours in a day qualify OR time as a limited resource. Accordingly, the objective of this manuscript is to reframe the process of OR scheduling as an ethical dilemma of allocating scarce medical resources. Recommendations for ethical allocation of OR time-based on both familiar and novel ethical values-are provided for healthcare institutions and individual surgeons.

Cultures of Practice: Specialty-Specific Differences in End-of-Life Conversations.

Importance: Goals of care discussions at the end of life give opportunity to affirm the autonomy and humanity of dying patients. Best practices exist for communication around goals of care, but there is no research on differences in approach taken by different specialties engaging these conversations. Objective: To describe the communication practices of internal medicine (IM), emergency medicine (EM), and critical care (CC) physicians in a high-fidelity simulation of a terminally ill patient with stable and defined end-of-life preferences. Design, Setting, and Participants: Mixed-methods secondary analysis of transcripts obtained from a multicenter study simulating high stakes, time-limited end-of-life decision making in a cohort of 88 volunteer physicians (27 IM, 22 EM, and 39 CC) who were called to evaluate a standardized patient in extremis. The patient had clear comfort-oriented goals of care that the physician needed to elicit and use to inform treatment decisions. Discussions were coded at the level of the sentence for semantic content. Exposures: Data were analyzed by physician specialty. Main Outcome Measure: Occurrence of content codes indicative of prudent (right outcome by the right means) goals of care conversations. Data were analyzed both for number of occurrences of the code in a simulated conversation and for presence or absence of the code within a conversation. Results: There was no difference between physician types in intubation rates or intensive care unit admissions. Codes for "comfort as a goal of care," "noncurative goals of care," and "oblique references to death" emerged as significantly different between physician types. Conclusions and Relevance: This experiment shows demonstrable differences in practice patterns between physician specialties when addressing end-of-life decision making. Some of the variation likely arose from differences in setting, but these data suggest that training in goals of care conversations may benefit if it is adapted to the distinct needs and culture of each specialty.

Key Physician Behaviors that Predict Prudent, Preference Concordant Decisions at the End of Life.

BACKGROUND: This study introduces an empirical approach for studying the role of prudence in physician treatment of end-of-life (EOL) decision making. METHODS: A mixed-methods analysis of transcripts from 88 simulated patient encounters in a multicenter study on EOL decision making. Physicians in internal medicine, emergency medicine, and critical care medicine were asked to evaluate a decompensating, end-stage cancer patient. Transcripts of the encounters were coded for actor, action, and content to capture the concept of Aristotelian prudence, and then quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed to identify actions associated with preference-concordant treatment. RESULTS: Focusing on codes that describe characteristics of physician-patient interaction, the code for physicians restating patient preferences was associated with avoiding intubation. Multiple codes were associated with secondary measures of preference-concordant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Prudent actions can be identified empirically, and research focused on the virtue of prudence may provide a new avenue for assessment and training in EOL care.

Comparison Is Not a Zero-Sum Game: Exploring Advanced Measures of Healthcare Ethics Consultation.

BACKGROUND: Studies across the healthcare spectrum consistently show that sharing and comparing data across institutions improves the quality of patient care. Whether comparing data about healthcare ethics consultation (HCEC) would similarly improve quality is unknown due to the lack of research on HCEC data sharing and comparison. Methods: To explore this possibility, we analyzed data from two academic medical centers in the Central-Southern United States that both employ a shared, robust coding system for ethics consultations (N = 703 cases total over 2.5 years) using descriptive and chi-square statistics, correlation coefficients and logistic regressions. Results: Our findings relate to patient age, care location, requestor role, and ethical themes, which together contribute to an improved evidence base for explanatory analyses and quality improvement initiatives. Conclusions: We conclude it is possible to analyze and compare HCEC activities across separate institutions using a standardized approach to data gathering, that this approach is consistent with concurrent narrative case review and assessment, and that cross-institutional comparisons are meaningful. Our results suggest future comparative analyses will require additional standardization of advanced measures for describing and analyzing HCEC activities.

Building an Organizational Ethics Program on a Clinical Ethics Foundation.

Organizational ethics programs often are created to address tensions in organizational values that have been identified through repeated clinical ethics consultation requests. Clinical ethicists possess some core competencies that are suitable for the leadership of high-quality organizational ethics programs, but they may need to develop new skills to build these programs, such as familiarity with healthcare delivery science, healthcare financing, and quality improvement methodology. To this end, we suggest that clinical ethicists build organizational ethics programs incrementally and via quality improvement projects undertaken in collaboration with senior clinical leaders. Organizational ethics programs often differ from clinical ethics programs in their membership and processes, and likely will require ethicists to forge new partnerships with a wide array of organizational leaders. With attention to the ways that organizational ethics programs differ from clinical ethics programs, and investment in quality improvement methodology and formal institutional needs assessments, clinical ethics leaders can position an organizational ethics program to advocate effectively for visible and compelling alignment of leadership decision making with the values of the organization.

Barriers and Facilitators to Discussing Goals of Care among Nephrology Trainees: A Qualitative Analysis and Novel Educational Intervention.

Background: Goals of care (GOC) conversations are critical to advance care planning but occur infrequently in nephrology. National workshops have improved trainee comfort with initiating GOC conversations but lack interface with palliative subspecialists and can incur travel-related costs. We developed an educational intervention focused on GOC conversations for nephrology trainees that incorporated into routine schedules and offered feedback from palliative subspecialists. Objective: To explore barriers and facilitators to discussing GOC and uncover perceptions of GOC-related behavior change post-intervention. Design: Qualitative study. Setting/Subjects: Sixteen nephrology trainees at an academic medical center. Measurements: Analyses of semistructured interviews occurred in phases: (1) isolation of quotes; (2) development of a coding system; and (3) creation of a framework of interrelationships between quotes using an inductive/deductive approach. Results: We captured the following themes: (1) prior knowledge (ability to define GOC, knowledge of communication frameworks and prognostic data, exposure to outpatient GOC conversations; (2) attitudes related to GOC conversations (responsibility, comfort, therapeutic alliance, patient preparedness, partnership with care teams); and (3) potential change in behaviors (increased likelihood to initiate GOC conversations early, more accurate identification of patients appropriate for a GOC conversation). Conclusions: Prior knowledge of, exposure to, and attitudes toward advance care planning were key determinants of a nephrology trainees' ability to initiate timely GOC conversations. After our intervention, trainees reported increased comfort with and likelihood to initiate GOC conversations and an improved ability to identify appropriate candidates. Our intervention may be a novel, feasible way to coach nephrologists to initiate timely GOC conversations.

Framing the future: Family preparedness for care transitions of critically ill children.

INTRODUCTION: Improving family centered care in the PICU requires understanding the milestones that families need assistance preparing for as well as factors that facilitate or obstruct preparedness. We present a model of family preparedness for transitions in the PICU based on semistructured interviews with clinicians and families that is designed to improve family centered care through the reduction of failed or traumatic transitions. METHOD: We conducted semistructured interviews with 20 clinicians and 25 families in an academic PICU. Transcript analysis focused on identifying factors facilitating or obstructing family preparedness for care transitions. We analyzed interview transcripts for emergent themes and metathemes using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Family preparedness for care transitions is dependent upon both cognitive and emotional preparedness. Six metathemes form a novel model for understanding the factors influencing both components of preparedness and their interrelationship. Specifically, family preparedness is influenced by (a) individualized backgrounds, coping skills, and support systems as well as the (b) emotional context, (c) care environment, (d) course of care, (e) content of preparatory information, and (f) manner in which care is coordinated to effectively deliver information. We also describe 10 transitional categories that provide context for application of the model. DISCUSSION: Cognitive and emotional preparedness for care transitions in the PICU develops through attentiveness to six features. The conceptual model presented here will allow clinicians to support family centered care through interventions to facilitate a shared development of expectations for the future and reduce the risk of failed or traumatic transitions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

When Only Family Is Available to Interpret.

When caring for patients and families who do not speak English, medical interpreters are necessary. Sometimes, our patients' families speak languages or dialects for which no in-person or video or phone interpreter can be found. If a family member is bilingual, the members of the medical team must make a difficult choice. Is it better to use a family member as translator or to not be able to communicate at all? In this article, we present the case of a critically ill patient with complicated pathophysiology whose family speaks a rare Guatemalan dialect for which no medical interpreters can be identified.

Managing Bias in Palliative Care: Professional Hazards in Goals of Care Discussions at the End of Life.

BACKGROUND: In the setting of end-of-life care, biases can interfere with patient articulation of goals and hinder provision of patient-centered care. No studies have addressed clinician bias or bias management specific to goals of care discussions at the end of life. OBJECTIVES: To identify and determine the prevalence of palliative care clinician biases and bias management strategies in end-of-life goals of care discussions. DESIGN: A semistructured interview guide with relevant domains was developed to facilitate data collection. Participants were asked directly to identify biases and bias management strategies applicable to this setting. Two researchers developed a codebook to identify themes using a 25% transcript sample through an iterative process based on grounded theory. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using Cohen κ. It was 0.83, indicating near perfect agreement between coders. The data approach saturation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sampling of 20 palliative care clinicians in Middle Tennessee participated in interviews. RESULTS: The 20 clinicians interviewed identified 16 biases and 11 bias management strategies. The most frequently mentioned bias was a bias against aggressive treatment (n = 9), described as a clinician's assumption that most interventions at the end of life are not beneficial. The most frequently mentioned bias management strategy was self-recognition of bias (n = 17), described as acknowledging that bias is present. CONCLUSION: This is the first study identifying palliative care clinicians' biases and bias management strategies in end-of-life goals of care discussions.

Modern Death Retold.

This review essay locates Haider Warraich's Modern Death: How Medicine Changed the End of Life (2017) in the lineage of books by physician writers who give us distinctive site lines into the veiled topic of human death and dying. A skilled storyteller, Warraich recombines established narratives on mortality and modern medicine and forges new emphases that underscore the socially mediated and negotiated dimensions of contemporary dying practices.

Obstacles to Shared Expectations in a Burn Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care patients are dependent on the health care team and their family members to effect care goals that are consistent with their core values and wishes. This study aimed to identify and understand how obstacles to communication affect these two disparate groups. Ten burn intensive care unit (BICU) care team and 20 family members participated in in-depth semistructured interviews. A two-cycle coding, inductive analytical approach was used to derive three obstacle metathemes: family engagement, information exchange, and process transparency and standardization. However, care team and family members' themes within each metatheme were different. Although the thematic structure was derived inductively, our findings in retrospect appeared to be consistent with Law's four resistances associated with actor-networks. From this perspective, actor-network theory provides a plausible explanation for perceived obstacles and may, in the future, guide the development of interventions to improve shared agency across networks.

Echo calling narcissus: what exceeds the gaze of clinical ethics consultation?

Guiding our response in this essay is our view that current efforts to demarcate the role of the clinical ethicist risk reducing its complex network of authorizations to sites of power and payment. In turn, the role becomes susceptible to various ideologies-individualisms, proceduralisms, secularisms-that further divide the body from the web of significances that matter to that body, where only she, the patient, is located. The security of policy, standards, and employment will pull against and eventually sever the authorization secured by authentic moral inquiry. Instead of asking "What do I need to know?", the question animating the drive to standardize will be "What is the policy or standard?" The claims of the authors in this issue of HEC Forum confirm these suspicions.

Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African-Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation.

Elevated psychological distress has been observed among people at increased risk for familial cancer. Researchers consider religiosity and spirituality (RS) to be positive coping mechanisms associated with reduced psychological distress. Relatively little is known about the impact of RS on genomic health issues. The objectives of our study were: (1) describe the prevalence of RS and depressive symptoms and (2) explore how RS relates to psychological distress in a cohort of individuals with a > or =25% prior probability of a genetic predisposition to cancer. Participants (n = 99) were drawn from an African-American, Louisiana-based kindred with a mutation at the BRCA1 locus. This analysis reports findings from a survey assessing RS and the use of three types of religious coping styles: collaborative, self-directing, and deferring. Clinically significant depressive symptoms were relatively high (27%); with females (33%) more likely than males (17%) to report symptoms (P < 0.01). The majority of participants reported being highly religious. The most commonly employed religious problem solving style used by participants was collaborative (X=22.9; SD=5.8) versus self-directing (X=12.8; SD = 5.1) and deferring (X=19.9; SD = 6.3). We did not observe significant associations between RS indicators and psychological distress, nor did we observe appreciable differences related to gender or risk perception. Although RS beliefs and practices are important for many African-Americans, we did not find evidence that indicators of self-reported RS are associated with psychological distress prior to genetic counseling and testing.

Religious and spiritual issues in medical genetics.

This article provides an overview of a special issue on the religious and spiritual concerns that arise in the provision of genetic services. It introduces some of the challenges in defining religion and spirituality and provides contexts and summaries for the empirical and normative research that appears in the issue.