Tumor Enucleation of Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Solitary Kidney.

We describe the case of a 57 year old man with a solitary kidney after undergoing resection of a Wilm's tumor as a child and a recent left partial colectomy who presents with an incidentally found clinical T1b renal mass. The patient underwent tumor enucleation and had no change in his renal function twelve days after surgery as compared to his preoperative baseline, highlighting the additional nephron-sparing associated with tumor enucleation as compared to partial nephrectomy that includes a gross margin of normal parenchyma.

Physicians' willingness to participate in the process of lethal injection for capital punishment.

BACKGROUND: It has been found that physicians condone colleague involvement in capital punishment. Physicians' own willingness to participate has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To examine physicians' willingness to be involved in cases of capital punishment. DESIGN: Survey exploring physicians' willingness to participate in 10 aspects of capital punishment by lethal injection, 8 of which are disallowed by the American Medical Association. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 1000 randomly selected practicing physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Questions assessing willingness to be involved in and attitudes toward capital punishment. RESULTS: 41% of respondents indicated that they would perform at least one action disallowed by the American Medical Association; 25% would perform five or more disallowed actions. Perceived duty to society (P < 0.001), approval of the death penalty (P < 0.001), and approval of assisted suicide (P = 0.015) correlated with increased willingness to perform disallowed actions. Only 3% of respondents knew of any guidelines on this issue. CONCLUSIONS: Despite medical society policies, many physicians would be willing to be involved in the execution of adults. The medical profession needs to be better informed about the ethical issues involved in physician participation in capital punishment.

Physicians' experiences with patients who transgress boundaries.

BACKGROUND: Boundary violations have been discussed in the literature, but most studies report on physician transgressions of boundaries or sexual transgressions by patients. We studied the incidence of all types of boundary transgressions by patients and physicians' responses to these transgressions. METHODS: We surveyed 1,000 members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) for the number of patient transgressions of boundaries which had occurred in the previous year. Categories were created by the investigators based on the literature. Physicians picked the most important transgression, and then were asked about their response to the transgression and its effect on the patient-physician relationship. Attitudinal questions addressed the likelihood of discharging patients who transgressed boundaries. The impact of demographic variables on the incidence of transgressions was analyzed using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty (37.5%) randomly selected SGIM members responded to the survey. Almost three quarters of the respondents had patients who used their first name, while 43% encountered verbal abuse, 39% had patients who asked personal questions, 31% had patients who were overly affectionate, and 27% encountered patients who attempted to socialize. All other transgressions, including physical abuse and attempts at sexual contact, were uncommon. Only gender affected the incidence of transgressions; female physicians encountered more personal questions (P = .001), inappropriate affection (P < .005), and sexually explicit language (P < .05) than male physicians and responded more negatively to boundary transgressions. Respondents dealt with transgressions by discussion with the patient or colleagues or by ignoring the incident, but such transgressions generally had a negative impact on the relationship. Most physicians would discharge patients who engaged in physical abuse or attempts at sexual contact, but were more tolerant of verbal abuse and overly affectionate patients. CONCLUSIONS: Boundary transgressions by patients is common, but usually involves more minor infractions. Female physicians are more likely to encounter certain types of transgressions. The incidence and outcomes of such transgressions are important in assisting physicians to deal effectively with this issue.

Lying to each other: when internal medicine residents use deception with their colleagues.

BACKGROUND: While lying is morally problematic, physicians have been known to use deception with their patients and with third parties. Little is known, however, about the use of deception between physicians. OBJECTIVES: To determine the likelihood that resident physicians say they would deceive other physicians in various circumstances and to examine how variations in circumstances affect the likelihood of using deception. METHODS: Two versions of a confidential survey using vignettes were randomly distributed to all internal medicine residents at 4 teaching hospitals in 1998. Survey versions differed by introducing slight variations to each vignette in ways we hypothesized would influence respondents' willingness to deceive. The likelihood that residents say they would use deception in response to each vignette was compared between versions. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty surveys were distributed (response rate, 67%). Of those who responded, 36% indicated they were likely to use deception to avoid exchanging call, 15% would misrepresent a diagnosis in a medical record to protect patient privacy, 14% would fabricate a laboratory value to an attending physician, 6% would substitute their own urine in a drug test to protect a colleague, and 5% would lie about checking a patient's stool for blood to cover up a medical mistake. For some of the scenarios, the likelihood of deceiving was influenced by variations in the vignettes. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of internal medicine residents report they would deceive a colleague in various circumstances, and the likelihood of using deception depends on the context. While lying about clinical issues is not common, it is troubling when it occurs at any time. Medical educators should be aware of circumstances in which residents are likely to deceive, and discuss ways to eliminate incentives to lie.

Chaperone use by residents during pelvic, breast, testicular, and rectal exams.

We designed a questionnaire survey to study internal medicine residents' plans to use a chaperone during the pelvic, breast, rectal, and testicular examinations. We found chaperone use by male and female residents differed markedly, and neither group planned to use chaperones universally. When examining female patients, male residents overall were very likely to use a chaperone during a pelvic exam, but less likely for the breast exam and rectal exam. For the female resident, there was a significantly lower likelihood of using chaperones during the pelvic, breast, or rectal exams. There was a much lower rate of chaperone use during the sensitive portions of the male physical examination compared with the female examination, with somewhat higher use by female residents. We concluded that male and female residents differ significantly in their patterns of chaperone use. It would be valuable to develop guidelines for chaperone use to help residents understand the issues involved in the choices, and to protect the residents from the possible medico-legal consequences of forgoing chaperones.

Love, boundaries, and the patient-physician relationship.

Physicians often use their relationships with patients to promote specific therapeutic goals. Because of their personal histories, values, and biases, patients may react to physicians in ways that inhibit or enhance the relationship. The feelings that are aroused may induce physicians to become overly distant, engendering patient and physician dissatisfaction, or to become overly involved emotionally, which can have serious psychological and clinical consequences. We explore how a balance between clinical objectivity and bonding with the patient is optimal and achievable. The nature and origin of personal boundaries are described. Boundary transgressions on the part of the patient are discussed, and the means of preventing transgressions by both patients and physicians through medical education, the process of self-awareness, and an exploration of family-of-origin issues are proposed. Through attention to communication with patients, the physician can maintain an empathetic yet objective relationship with the patient.

Confidentiality and health insurance fraud.

BACKGROUND: Health insurance fraud committed by patients may be an increasing problem given the number of underinsured and uninsured people in the United States. Physicians recognizing acts of health insurance fraud perpetrated by patients face an ethical dilemma: should they disclose the incident to the insurance company, or protect patient confidentiality? OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' attitudes toward the reporting of patient-initiated health insurance fraud. METHODS: Three hundred seven physician members of the American College of Physicians returned a mailed questionnaire that presented 6 case vignettes (3 variables) of patients who used a relative's insurance to obtain health care in the past. For each vignette, respondents were asked whether the treating physician should report insurance fraud to the health insurance carrier. RESULTS: Sixty-three respondents (20.7%) indicated that physicians should report all the patients presented in the vignettes, while 45 (14.8%) indicated none should be reported; the rest indicated that the decisions to-report should be based on the characteristics presented, with acute vs terminal illness (P < .001), history of fraud (P < .001), and wealth of the patient (P < .001) all causing physicians to be more likely to report the patient to the health insurance carrier. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that type of practice (P = .04) and respondents' experiences with insurance fraud (P = .03) had significant effects on the willingness to report patients. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are divided about whether to report patients who have committed insurance fraud. Their decisions to report insurance fraud are influenced by their attitudes and demographic features, as well as by patient factors.

Psychiatric screening in primary care: what do patients really want?

Psychiatric disorders are common in primary care, but underdiagnosed. U.S. physician reluctance to diagnose psychiatric illnesses is partly attributable to the belief that patients do not want their primary care physician to assess mental health. Six hundred one patients in a U.S. general internal medicine practice completed the SCREENER, a self-report questionnaire which screens for 15 psychiatric disorders, and another questionnaire about the SCREENER. Patients were predominantly female, unmarried, black, high school graduates. Only 3% thought that their physician should never evaluate their mental health. More than 60% desired periodic mental health screening, and one third wanted psychiatric assessment only when a problem was suspected. Attitudes toward questionnaire screening were less positive than toward physician interview. Patients were more likely to want screening if they were female, unmarried, young, had a history of mental health treatment, reported psychiatric symptoms, or were in fair-poor subjective physical or mental health.

Classifying general medicine readmissions. Are they preventable? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies in Health Services Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmissions.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a new quality assessment method used to classify the preventability of hospitalization in terms of patient, clinician, or system factors. DESIGN: The instrument was developed in two phases. Phase 1 was a prospective comparison of admitting residents' and their attending physicians' classifications of the perceived preventability of consecutive admissions to one Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) excluding admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU). In phase 2, a panel of 10 physicians rated 811 abstracted records of readmissions from nine VAMCs. SETTING: Nine VAMCs across the United States with varying degrees of university hospital affiliation. PATIENTS: Phase 1, 156 patients admitted to the general medicine service at the Durham VAMC. Phase 2, 514 patients accounting for 811 readmissions within 6 months of a general medicine service discharge at nine VAMCs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians used a checklist to record the reason for hospitalization, the preventability of the hospitalization, and, if preventable, a reason defining preventability, which was classified in terms of system, clinician, and patient factors. In phase 2, two physician panelists assessed preventability for each chart. When two panelists disagreed on the preventability of hospitalization, a third panelist, blind to the original assessments, rated the chart. In phase 1, residents and attending physicians rated 33% and 34% of admissions as preventable (kappa = 0.41), respectively. In phase 2, 277 (34%) of 811 readmissions were deemed preventable. Intraobserver accuracy for the assessment of preventability was 96% (kappa = 0.89). interobserver accuracy was 73% (kappa = 0.43). Hospital system factors accounted for 37% of preventable readmissions, clinician factors for 38%, and patient factors for 21%. The nine hospitals differed markedly in their profile of reasons for preventable readmissions (p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Using a new method of determining the preventability of hospitalizations, we identified several factors that might avert hospitalizations. Focusing efforts to identify preventable hospitalizations may yield better methods for managing patients' total health care needs; however, the content of those efforts will vary by institution.

Suicide screening in a primary care setting at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Seven-hundred and three patients from a general medical outpatient clinic at a Veterans Affairs hospital completed the SCREENER, a brief self-report questionnaire that screens for psychiatric disorders. The authors found that 7.3% of the patients had suicidal ideation. The younger and white patients were at increased risk. The risk was increased twelvefold in those patients with subjectively fair or poor mental health, sevenfold in the patients with a history of mental health treatment, and fourfold in the patients with fair or poor perceived physical health. When major depression was controlled for, anxiety and substance abuse disorders continued to show an association with suicidal ideation. The suicidal patients made more visits to their primary care physician. Screening patients for anxiety disorders and drug abuse, as well as depression, is a better approach for identifying suicidal ideation in primary care settings than screening for depression alone and may help prevent suicide and suicide attempts.

Telling patients about the diagnosis of HIV infection.

This study used a questionnaire to examine how patients in the HIV/AIDS Clinic at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital were told of their diagnosis, by whom, and to what degree they were given emotional and educational support. Nearly 17% of patients were informed by someone not in the health professions (often military personnel), and 27% of patients were notified in a nonprivate setting. Forty-seven percent indicated they received little or no educational support at the time of diagnosis, while 39% received little or no emotional support. Educational and emotional support for patients at the time of HIV diagnosis may be lacking.

Primary care patients' reactions to mental health screening.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined whether there is empirical support for the notion that medical patients are upset by being asked questions about psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Six hundred and one patients attending a primary care clinic completed the SCREENER-a newly developed, brief self-administered questionnaire that surveys a broad range of psychopathology. In addition, they completed a second questionnaire that assessed their attitudes toward the SCREENER. RESULTS: We found a high level of acceptance by patients. The questions were judged easy to answer, and they rarely aroused significant negative affect. Fewer than 2 percent of the patients judged the questions difficult to answer, and fewer than 3 percent were "very much" embarrassed, upset, annoyed, or uncomfortable with the questions. Individuals with a history of psychiatric treatment and poorer current mental health reacted more unfavorably to the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: From the patient's perspective, it is feasible and acceptable to use self-administered questionnaires for routine screening of psychiatric problems in primary care settings.

Patients' perceptions of office medical practice: judging quality through the patients' eyes.

With increasing pressure to measure quality, patient-based assessments of medical care are becoming increasingly important. Patients offer a unique perspective for evaluating the nontechnical aspects of medical care. This study reviews the importance of utilizing patients' perceptions to measure quality of care in office settings. It also reviews the principles required to conduct a well done survey. The concept of patient perceptions differs from the more commonly measured concept of patient satisfaction, in that perceptions measure whether a patients' needs and expectations are met, in addition to satisfaction. One of the most accurate and efficient means of measuring patients' perceptions is through the use of surveys. As with all standardized data collection, creating and performing high quality surveys of patients' perceptions can be challenging. Valid and reliable patient survey data can enable practitioners to identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate to external reviewers the quality of care they provide to their patients.

Suicidal ideation among urban medical outpatients.

The prevalence of current suicidal ideation among urban primary care outpatients was assessed, and suicidal and non-suicidal patients were compared with regard to their demographic characteristics and their attitudes toward mental health screening. Twenty (3.3%) patients reported having thoughts of killing themselves. The patients who had suicidal ideation were significantly younger and more frequently divorced. Almost all (97.6%) of the patients indicated that their physicians should inquire about emotional health issues at some time, and the suicidal patients were nonsignificantly more likely to recommend inquiry about psychiatric symptoms at every visit (55.0% vs 37.0%, p < 0.11). Only half of the suicidal patients reported lifetime histories of mental health treatment. The majority (70.2%) of the patients believed that it would be easy to discuss mental health problems with their medical physicians. Among the patients who had previously received psychiatric treatment, the suicidal patients were nearly three times more likely to anticipate that it would be difficult or very difficult to talk to their physicians about psychiatric problems. In contrast, among the patients who had no history of mental health treatment, there was no association between suicidal ideation and anticipated discomfort in talking with their physicians about emotional health.

Psychiatric screening in geriatric primary care: should it be for depression alone?

Depression in the elderly is highly prevalent, associated with functional disability and increased medical costs, and treatable; however, it is infrequently recognized and treated. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research has advocated, therefore, increased case-finding efforts for depression in primary geriatric care. Anxiety, substance, and somatoform disorders in the elderly are similarly prevalent, associated with disability and cost, treatable, and also infrequently detected and treated. We believe that psychiatric case-finding in geriatric primary care should attend to these disorders, therefore, as well as to depression. In the present study, we examined whether the association between depressive and nondepressive forms of psychopathology was similar in geriatric and nongeriatric medical patients. We also examined the relationship between each type of pathology and health care utilization and global ratings of physical and mental health. In a VA hospital general medical outpatient clinic, 508 patients completed the SCREENER, which is a brief self-report questionnaire that screens for a range of psychiatric disorders, along with a self-report questionnaire regarding subjective health and medical care utilization. Of these patients, 98% were male, and the median age was 63 years. Patients aged 63 and over were compared to younger patients. In both geriatric and younger adult patients, we found substantial comorbidity between depressive and nondepressive forms of pathology. Moreover, in both age groups, there were significant associations between both depressive and nondepressive symptoms and fair-to-poor self-rated physical and mental health and increased medical care utilization. Approximately half of the cases of nondepressive disorders in the elderly were not comorbid with depression, and thus would not have been detected by screening for depression alone. Therefore, psychiatric case finding in primary care of geriatric males should be directed at anxiety, substance, and somatoform disorders, as well as at depression, for treatment resources to be triaged to maximally decrease morbidity and cost.

Screening for depression in medical patients. Is the focus too narrow?

There is growing consensus that depression is a major public health problem causing significant psychosocial morbidity and mortality which should be addressed by case-finding effects in primary care settings. A large amount of literature has examined the ability of self-report questionnaires to detect depression in medical patients and the results have been encouraging. However, studies of general population and psychiatric patient samples indicate that depression is frequently comorbid with other psychiatric disorders, and that psychiatric disorders other than depression are also associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, we believe that psychiatric screening in primary care should be broad based. We administered a newly developed, multidimensional questionnaire (the SCREENER), that simultaneously screens for a range of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders, to 508 medical outpatients attending a VA general medical clinic. Compared with nondepressed cases, the depressed patients significantly more often reported all of the nondepressive symptoms. Nine of the ten nondepressive disorders screened for by the SCREENER were significantly more frequent in the depressed group. Most patients who screened positive for depression also screened positive for at least one nondepressive disorder. Compared with patients who only screened positive for depression, those who screened positive for both depression and a nondepressive disorder rated their physical and emotional health more poorly and made more visits to the doctor. Compared with patients who did not screen positive for any disorder, those who only screened positive for a nondepressive disorder rated their physical and emotional health more poorly, and more frequently had a history of mental health treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Screening for psychiatric disorders in medical patients: a feasibility and patient acceptance study.

This study examines whether medical patients were bothered or upset by being asked to complete a questionnaire about emotional and substance use problems, and whether a newly developed, brief questionnaire that screens for several psychiatric disorders (the SCREENER) was easy for patients to complete. A consecutive series of outpatients attending the General Medical Clinic at the Philadelphia Veterans Affair Medical Center (VAMC) was approached to ask their participation in a research study requiring the completion of a brief questionnaire about their emotions, moods, thoughts, and behaviors, and a second questionnaire that asked their opinion about the first measure. Only 3.1% of the patients indicated that the questions were difficult to answer, whereas 84.6% found the questions easy or very easy to answer. Between 80% to 90% of the patients were not embarrassed, upset, annoyed, or uncomfortable by answering the questions. Individuals with a history of psychiatric treatment and poorer current mental health were the most likely to have a negative reaction to the questionnaire. Thus, the medical patients in this study reacted favorably to the completion of a broad-based questionnaire about emotional problems. The questions were judged easy to answer and rarely aroused significant negative affect.

Intern candidates who withdraw from contracts: incidence and internal medicine program directors' attitudes.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of intern candidates accepted through the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) or after the match who subsequently withdraw and the attitudes of program directors regarding this issue. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING: Four hundred fifty-four internal medicine program directors. MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaires assessing program directors' attitudes toward interns who contract for positions after having verbal or written agreements elsewhere (and the program directors who accept them), the importance of this problem, and the incidence of this problem. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-five programs (of the 221 responding) experienced intern withdrawals. Programs with larger numbers of open positions after the match had more intern withdrawals (p = 0.03). Eleven of the program directors knew of the prior commitment of the intern, and in all cases the other program director was called for permission to accept the intern. Program directors had negative feelings about both the interns who withdrew and the program directors who accepted them. Community, municipal, and Veterans Affairs hospital program directors were significantly less negative than those in university and university-affiliated hospitals toward interns who withdrew from written commitments (p = 0.001) and the program directors who accepted them (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Problems with intern candidate withdrawals from offered/matched programs affect a significant proportion of programs, especially those with larger numbers of unmatched positions. Program directors are generally disapproving.