Three-Dimensional Geometric Analysis of Viabahn VBX Bridging Stent Grafts in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the 3-dimensional flare geometry of the Gore Viabahn VBX balloon-expandable covered stent (BECS) after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) and to determine and visualize BECS-associated complications. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who underwent FEVAR between 2018 and 2022 in 3 vascular centers participating in the VBX Expand Registry. Patients with at least one visceral artery treated with the VBX and with availability of 2 post-FEVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans (follow-up [FU] 1: 0-6 months; FU2: 9-24 months) were included. The flare geometry of the VBX, including flare-to-fenestration distance, flare-to-fenestration diameter ratio, flare angle, and apposition with the target artery were assessed using a vascular workstation and dedicated CTA applied software. RESULTS: In total, 90 VBX BECS were analyzed in 43 FEVAR patients. The median CTA FU for FU1 and FU2 was 35 days (interquartile range [IQR], 29-51 days) and 14 months (IQR, 13-15 months), respectively. The mean flare-to-fenestration distance was 5.6±2.0 mm on FU1 and remained unchanged at 5.7±2.0 mm on FU2 (p=.417). The flare-to-fenestration diameter ratio was 1.19±0.17 on FU1 and remained unchanged at 1.21±0.19 (p=.206). The mean apposition length was 18.6±5.3 mm on FU1 and remained 18.6±5.3 mm (p=.550). The flare angle was 31°±15° on FU1 and changed to 33°±16° (p=.009). On FU1, the BECS-associated complication rate was 1%, and the BECS-associated reintervention rate was 0%. On FU2, the BECS-associated complication rate was 3%, and the BECS-associated reintervention rate was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The flare geometry of the VBX bridging stent did not change significantly during 14 months follow-up in this study. Three-dimensional geometric analysis of the flare may contribute to identify the origin of endoleaks and occlusions, but this should be confirmed in a larger study including enough patients and BECS to compare complicated and uncomplicated cases. CLINICAL IMPACT: The three-dimensional flare geometry of the Gore Viabahn VBX BECS was assessed on the first and second postoperative CTA scans, and geometrical changes during this period were identified. For BECS that were diagnosed with a type 3c endoleak or occlusion, the BECS geometry was analyzed to detect geometrical components that were related to the complication. Geometric analysis of the flare may help to better detect and identify the cause of such complications.

Perceptions, awareness, and implementation surrounding the assessment of frailty amongst vascular surgeons in Italy: Results from a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this survey to gain insight into the real-life application and perceptions regarding the importance of peri-operative frailty assessment amongst vascular surgeons in Italy. METHODS: Italian vascular surgeons were invited to participate in the survey using the list provided by the Italian Society for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (1050 invited participants). A dedicated link to the survey was emailed through Google Forms, and reminders were automatically sent on a bi-weekly basis for a total of 8 weeks before stopping data collection. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 225 respondents, thereby yielding an overall 21.5% response rate. While the vast majority of respondents stated they were aware of the meaning of frailty (93%) and agreed that its assessment was clinically relevant for patients undergoing vascular surgery (99%), only 44% of surveyed surgeons reported that they used a specific tool for peri-operative frailty assessment. However, most respondents indicated that routine evaluation of frailty was not performed at their institution (87%). The main limitations were identified as being the lack of confidence in choosing the best tool, followed by lack of awareness, lack of skilled operators, and lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that whilst most vascular surgeons in Italy are aware of the importance of frailty in affecting surgical outcomes across various interventions in the elective and non-elective settings, there is poor implementation of formal frailty assessment.

Endovascular aneurysm repair under local anesthesia through bilateral percutaneous femoral access is a safe strategy to improve early outcomes and reduce hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the impact of anesthetic conduct, alone and in combination with the type of femoral access, on early results after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A retrospective multicenter analysis on patients undergoing elective standard EVAR at four academic centers was performed. Patients undergoing the procedure through either local or general anesthesia were compared. Comparative subanalyses of the two groups were performed for the type of femoral access to evaluate further impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-four patients underwent elective standard EVAR, of which 207 (39.5%) under general anesthesia and 317 (60.5%) under local anesthesia. Patients who underwent general anesthesia had higher 30-day mortality rates (3.4% vs. 0.3%, P=0.005), as well as slightly worse 30-day major systemic complication rates (8.2% vs. 5.4%, P=0.195). There were no differences in terms of reinterventions (2.1% vs. 2.5%, P=0.768) and aneurysm-related mortality (0% vs. 0.4%, P=0.422) at one year. Total intervention times were significantly longer in the general anesthesia group (126 vs. 89 minutes, P=0.001), as well as the total length of hospital stay (7.6 vs. 5.3 days, P=0.007). At subanalyses, the combination of local anesthesia with bilateral percutaneous femoral access further improved 30-day outcomes and determined an additional reduction in total intervention times and ICU stays. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR performed under local anesthesia has a significantly better impact on early results when compared to general anesthesia. Combining percutaneous bilateral femoral access to local anesthesia reduced procedural times, ICU stays and consequently improved early results.

CO2 is the contrast media to choose in patients with initial Chronic Kidney Disease undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair to prevent further renal function deterioration.

OBJECTIVE: Even low quantities of iodine contrast media (ICM) could be responsible for exacerbation of a chronic kidney disease (CKD). Aim of this study was to determine whether it is more reasonable to perform endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures in patients with initial CKD using CO2 rather than ICM to prevent further kidney deterioration. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed at our institution to identify patients with preoperative CKD at initial stage (class G3a-G3b according to KDOQI-KDIGO classification) who underwent either CO2-EVAR or ICM-EVAR. Primary endpoint was renal function evaluation; secondary endpoints were technical success, perioperative complications, hospital stay, and reinterventions and overall mortality at follow-up. RESULTS: Both CO2-EVAR and ICM-EVAR groups were composed of 21 patients. There were no differences in demographics, anatomy, and comorbidities, apart from worse ASA score in CO2-EVAR group (100% vs 57.1%, p = .001). Preoperative serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were comparable (1.73 vs 1.6 mg/dl, p = .082 and 39.71 vs 43.04 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = .935). At follow-up (16.7 ± 18.1 months), CO2-EVAR was not associated with significant changes in creatinine and GFR, whereas ICM-EVAR determined a significant increase in creatinine (1.6 mg/dl vs 1.91 mg/dl, p = .04) and decrease in GFR values (43 vs 37.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = .04), determining the need for dialysis in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: ICM seems to be a determining factor in worsening renal function; therefore, an effort should be made to standardize the use of CO2 as the contrast medium of choice in patients with initial renal insufficiency undergoing EVAR.

Guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment and management of visceral and renal arteries aneurysms: a joint assessment by the Italian Societies of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE) and Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM).

The objective of these Guidelines is to provide recommendations for the classification, indication, treatment and management of patients suffering from aneurysmal pathology of the visceral and renal arteries. The methodology applied was the GRADE-SIGN version, and followed the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist. Clinical questions, structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) model, were formulated, and systematic literature reviews were carried out according to them. Selected articles were evaluated through specific methodological checklists. Considered Judgments were compiled for each clinical question in which the characteristics of the body of available evidence were evaluated in order to establish recommendations. Overall, 79 clinical practice recommendations were proposed. Indications for treatment and therapeutic options were discussed for each arterial district, as well as follow-up and medical management, in both candidate patients for conservative therapy and patients who underwent treatment. The recommendations provided by these guidelines simplify and improve decision-making processes and diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of patients with visceral and renal arteries aneurysms. Their widespread use is recommended.

Early and long-term results of surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms using a heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethilene graft.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess early and long-term results of open surgical interventions for popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) with the use of heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (HePTFE) in a single center, retrospective, non-comparative cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained dataset, including 207 open interventions for PAAs between 2002 and 2022, was performed and 170 procedures carried on with the use of a HePTFE graft were found. Perioperative results were analyzed in terms of mortality, graft thrombosis and amputation rates. Follow-up results were analyzed in terms of survival, primary and secondary patency, freedom from amputation, freedom from reintervention with life-table analysis and Kaplan Meier curves. Follow-up results were considered as primary outcomes, whereas perioperative results were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In 82 interventions (48%) the PAA was asymptomatic. In 140 cases a medial approach was used, while in 30 cases a posterior approach was preferred. The level of the distal anastomosis was the p3 tract of the popliteal artery in 89% of the cases. One perioperative death occurred; early thromboses occurred in eight cases and the overall perioperative amputation rate was 2.8%. The median duration of follow-up was 48 months (range 1-251). Estimated survival rate at 10 years was 55% (standard error, SE, 0.065). The 10-year rates of primary and secondary patency and freedom from amputation were 40.8% (SE 0.06), 47.6% (SE 0.065) and 93.4% (SE 0.04), respectively. The estimated freedom from reintervention rate at 10 years was 57% (SE 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large monocentric experience showed that open surgical repair of PAAs with HePTFE is a safe procedure, with low rates of perioperative complications, and excellent results in the long-term setting.

Results of current endovascular treatments for visceral artery aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: This single-center retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze the early and long-term results of endovascular treatment for true visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs). Moreover, a comparison with the results of our previously published historical series of open surgical procedures was performed. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2021, 78 consecutive patients were treated at our institution for true VAAs. All demographic data, procedural details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data were collected prospectively from a dedicated database. A retrospective analysis identified 72 patients who underwent endovascular surgery. Early results were analyzed in terms of technical success, conversion to open surgery, mortality, and local and systemic morbidities. Follow-up results were analyzed in terms of survival, need for open or endovascular reintervention, and freedom from complications at the level of the treated visceral artery. These results were then compared with those of our historical open surgical group (1982-2007), which included 54 interventions. RESULTS: In four cases, the planned endovascular procedure could not be completed, and the overall technical success rate was 94.5%. No deaths occurred during the hospital stay or within 30 days after surgery. Overall, the 30-day perioperative complication rate was 5.8%, with an early reintervention rate of 2.9%. The median follow-up time was 29 months (range, 1-132 months). The estimated 7-year survival rate was 88% (standard error [SE]. 0.05). The estimated 7-year aneurysm-related complication-free rate was 85.5% (SE, 0.06), with reintervention-free and aneurysm-related complication-free survival rates of 93.3% (SE, 0.04) and 75.6% (SE, 0.07), respectively. At the 7-year follow-up, the survival rate was similar between the endovascular and open groups. There was a trend toward a higher aneurysm-related complication rate in the endovascular group than in the open group (14.5% vs 6.4%; P = .07). However, no significant differences in reintervention-free and overall estimated aneurysm-related complication-free survival rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is safe and effective in patients with VAAs, with low perioperative complication rates. The long-term outcomes were satisfactory and comparable with those of the historical series of open surgical repairs. Even if there is a trend toward a higher risk of late aneurysm-related complications among endovascular patients, it does not imply an increased need for late reinterventions.

Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE).

The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.

Stability of the aneurysmatic sac post-EVAR could no longer be a reliable criterion of healing.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the impact of aneurysm sac behavior in terms of either stability or shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 1483 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR from 1999 to 2021 at our institution. 1037 patients met inclusion criteria (1037/1483, 69.9%): abdominal aortic or aorto-iliac aneurysm, elective surgery, follow-up (FU) ≥12 months. Patients who had sac stability (330/1037, 31.8%) and patients who demonstrated sac shrinkage (542/1037, 52.2%) at FU were compared; patients who presented sac increase at FU were excluded (165/1037, 16%). PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: rupture rates, need for surgical conversion, and long-term aneurysm-related mortality. Secondary endpoints: all type endoleak rates and long-term reintervention rates. RESULTS: Mean FU was 61.2 months (IQ 26-85.7 months). In terms of comorbidities, the group of patients with stable sac showed greater association with polidistrectual atherosclerotic manifestations. Estimated 12-year survival was 42.9% in the stable sac group and 65% in the shrinked group (P<0.001), although there were no significant differences in terms of freedom from aneurysm-related death (97.3% vs. 95.4% estimated at 12 years, P=0.493). Patients with sac stability had higher rates of rupture (2.1% vs. 0.6%, P=0.035) and surgical conversion (2.1% vs. 0.6%, P=0.035). The stable sac group had significantly higher rates of all type endoleak during FU (45.8% vs. 24%, P<0.001). Estimated 12-year freedom from reintervention rates were 56.2% and 83.9% respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After more than 20 years of EVAR experience it is probably time to reconsider the procedure clinical success parameters as a patient with a stable sac cannot be considered healed.

Results of the multicenter pELVIS Registry for isolated common iliac aneurysms treated by the iliac branch device.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the short- and long-term results of off-label use of iliac branch devices (IBDs) in isolated common iliac artery aneurysms compared with the manufacturer-recommended configuration with additional extension in the infrarenal aorta based on the pELVIS Registry (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation). METHODS: Between January 2005 and April 2017, 804 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with 910 IBDs owing to aneurysmal involvement of the iliac bifurcation in nine high-volume European vascular centers. Among this cohort, 231 IBDs were implanted in 207 patients to treat an isolated common iliac aneurysm; 91 IBDs (group 1) were implanted without proximal aortic extension in the infrarenal aorta, and in the remaining cases (n = 140; group 2) an aortic bifurcated stent graft was deployed proximally as stated in the instructions for use. Primary outcomes were IBD and target hypogastric artery occlusions, type I and III endoleaks, procedure-related reinterventions, and aneurysm-related deaths. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 90 cases (98.9%) in group 1 versus 137 cases (97.8%) in group 2 (P = .55). The overall aneurysm-related early reintervention rate for the two groups was 4.4% (4 of 91) and 2.1% (3 of 140), respectively (P = .33). The 30-day mortality was 1.1% in group 1 (n = 1), and 0% in group 2 (P = .21). The median postoperative follow-up in groups 1 and 2 were 34.1 months (range, 1-108 months) and 17.5 months (range, 1-90 months), respectively. The estimated rates of freedom from IBD occlusion at 60 months were 86% in group 1 and 83% in group 2 (P = .69). The estimated rates of freedom from target hypogastric artery occlusion at 60 months were 98.3% in group 1 and 91.3% in group 2 (P = .45). The estimated freedom from reintervention rates at 60 months for types I, types III, and IBD stenosis-occlusion were 78.2% in group 1 and 79.9% in group 2 (P = .79). The estimated freedom from all cause reintervention at 60 months was 64.5% in group 1 and 66.1% in group 2 (P = .44). The estimated freedom from aneurysm-related death at 60 months was 97.9% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (P = .83). CONCLUSIONS: Single IBD placement for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective treatment option, when a proper anatomic patient selection is provided. Major benefits are represented by the decrease in X ray exposure, overall procedural time, and use of contrast medium, without affecting perioperative and long-term results in comparison with more extensive procedures.