Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
J Neurol ; 270(10): 4687-4696, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a prevalent and debilitating manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, it is not included in the widely used concept of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3). We expanded the NEDA-3 concept to NEDA-3 + by encompassing CI assessed through the Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) and evaluated the effect of teriflunomide on NEDA3 + in patients treated in a real-world setting. The value of NEDA-3 + in predicting disability progression was also assessed. METHODS: This 96-weeks observational study enrolled patients already on treatment with teriflunomide for ≥ 24 weeks. The predictiveness of NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + at 48 weeks on the change in motor disability at 96 weeks was compared through a two-sided McNemar test. RESULTS: The full analysis set (n = 128; 38% treatment naïve) featured relatively low level of disability (baseline EDSS = 1.97 ± 1.33). NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + statuses were achieved by 82.8% and 64.8% of patients, respectively at 48 weeks vs. baseline, and by 57.0% and 49.2% of patients, respectively at 96 weeks vs. baseline. All patients except one were free of disability progression at Week 96, and NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + were equally predictive. Most patients were free of relapse (87.5%), disability progression (94.5%) and new MRI activity (67.2%) comparing 96 weeks with baseline. SDMT scores were stable in patients with baseline score ˃35 and improved significantly in those with baseline score ≤ 35. Treatment persistence was high (81.0% at Week 96). CONCLUSION: Teriflunomide confirmed its real-world efficacy and was found to have a potentially beneficial effect on cognition.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Transtornos Motores , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Cognição
2.
J Inflamm Res ; 15: 3259-3267, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35673354

RESUMO

The first subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab CT-P13 has been authorized for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe in 2019. Later, in 2020, approved indications were extended also to ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The present review provides summary of the key features of SC infliximab, with particular focus on pharmacokinetic profile, clinical development program in comparison with the intravenous (IV) formulation, and the latest evidence in the literature. We conclude that SC infliximab represents a new and promising approach in the treatment of patients with RA, offering an optimized clinical profile and a more practical option in comparison to the IV formulation. Nevertheless, SC formulation can improve the use of national health systems resources (e.g., through the time of healthcare workers not having to supervise infusions) and facilitate social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, as the patient can self-inject the medicine at home without going to the hospital. The limitations of the SC infliximab are mainly due to the limited experience of use in clinical practice and the absence of long-term drug retention data.

3.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 9(4): e00816, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34232554

RESUMO

We aimed to evaluate the quality of clinical evidence that substantiated approval of cancer medicines by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the last decade. We performed a systematic review and data synthesis of EMA documents in agreement with PRISMA guidelines. We included the European Public Assessment Reports, Summaries of Product Characteristics, and published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on anti-cancer drugs approved by EMA from 2010 to 2019, and excluded drugs not indicated for targeting solid or hematological tumors and non-innovative treatments. We synthesized frequencies of approvals differentiating between unblinded and blinded RCTs with and without overall survival (OS) as a predefined primary outcome measure. We assessed the frequency of post-approval RCTs for indications without at least one RCT at the time of approval. Of 199 approvals, 159 (80%) were supported by at least one RCT, 63 (32%) by at least one RCT having OS as the primary or co-primary endpoint, 74 (37%) by at least one blinded RCT, and 30 (15%) by at least one blinded RCT having OS as the primary or co-primary endpoint. Whereas 40 approvals (20%) were not supported by any RCT and, of those, 9 (22%) were followed by a post-approval RCT. While the majority of approvals of cancer medicines approved by EMA was supported by at least one RCT, we noted substantial methodological heterogeneity of the studies. Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020206669.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Aprovação de Drogas , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Europa (Continente) , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
J Pain Res ; 13: 1777-1784, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32765053

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Acute trauma pain management in the elderly population is a challenge. Inhaled methoxyflurane represents a promising treatment option; however, data in the elderly population are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subgroup, post hoc analysis including 69 patients aged ≥65 years from a randomized, active-controlled, open-label study in the emergency setting. Key inclusion criterion was moderate-to-severe pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] score ≥ 4]) secondary to trauma in a single limb. Patients received inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1 g or ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS ≥7]). The primary endpoint was the overall change in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity from randomization to the next 3, 5, and 10 min. Secondary endpoints included time to onset of pain relief (TOPR), efficacy up to 30 min, judgment of operators and patients, and safety. RESULTS: Pain reduction over time was similar in both groups. Median TOPR was shorter for methoxyflurane (9 min; 95% CI: 7.8, 10.2 min) than SAT (15 min; 95% CI: 10.2, 19.8 min). In terms of treatment satisfaction, patients and operators rated treatment efficacy and practicality, respectively, as "Excellent" or "Very good" 5.7 times and 3.4 times more frequently than SAT. A similar rate of adverse events (methoxyflurane: 6 events; SAT: 7 events) was recorded, all non-serious. No clinically significant changes in vital signs parameters were observed, and methoxyflurane did not result in cases of bradycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with trauma pain, inhaled methoxyflurane shows similar pain relief and safety compared to SAT, offering advantages in terms of onset of effect and user's satisfaction. Although this analysis presents some methodological limitations, it provides the first specific evidence of the use of inhaled methoxyflurane in the elderly population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-001565-25; Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03585374.

5.
J Pain Res ; 13: 1547-1555, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32612382

RESUMO

Adequate treatment of trauma pain is an integral part of the management of trauma patients, not just for ethical reasons but also because undertreated pain can lead to increased morbidities and worse long-term outcomes. Trauma pain management presents challenges in the pre-hospital setting, particularly in adverse or hostile environments as well as in busy emergency departments (EDs). Inhaled methoxyflurane, administered at analgesic doses via a disposable inhaler, has recently become available in Europe for the emergency treatment of moderate to severe pain in conscious adult trauma patients. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that inhaled methoxyflurane is well tolerated and effective in providing a rapid onset of analgesia. In this paper, we discuss the rationale for methoxyflurane use in trauma pain management, data from clinical trials recently conducted in Europe, its efficacy and safety profile compared to current standard treatments, its place in therapy and organizational impact. We conclude that inhaled methoxyflurane represents an effective treatment option in the different settings where trauma patients require rapid and flexible pain resolution, with potential organizational advantages.

6.
J Pain Res ; 13: 491-502, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32184653

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of treatment for severe trauma pain in the emergency setting, but there are barriers to their use. This post hoc analysis of a previously reported trial (MEDITA) investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane versus intravenous (IV) morphine for severe trauma pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MEDITA was a Phase IIIb, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study in Italian pre-hospital units and emergency departments (EudraCT: 2017-001565-25; NCT03585374). Adult patients (N=272) with moderate-to-severe trauma pain (score ≥4 on the Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) were randomized 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1g or ketoprofen 100mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS ≥7]). Analyses were performed for the severe pain subgroup. The primary efficacy variable was the overall change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity at 3, 5 and 10min post-randomization. Non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus morphine was concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference was <1; superiority was concluded if the upper 95% CI was <0. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (methoxyflurane: 49; SAT: 44) were included in the severe pain intention-to-treat population. The reduction in VAS pain intensity over the first 10min was superior for methoxyflurane versus morphine (adjusted mean treatment difference: -5.54mm; 95% CI: -10.49, -0.59mm; p=0.029). Median time to onset of pain relief was 9min for methoxyflurane and 15min for morphine. Patients rated treatment efficacy and physicians rated treatment practicality "Excellent" or "Very good" for more methoxyflurane-treated patients (42.8% and 67.3%) than morphine-treated patients (18.1% and 22.8%). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported in 20.4% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and in 4.8% of morphine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane provided superior short-term pain relief to IV morphine in patients with severe trauma pain and offers an effective non-narcotic treatment option.

7.
Cardiol Young ; 30(3): 337-345, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31983379

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tuberous sclerosis complex is a rare genetic disorder leading to the growth of hamartomas in multiple organs, including cardiac rhabdomyomas. Children with symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyoma require frequent admissions to intensive care units, have major complications, namely, arrhythmias, cardiac outflow tract obstruction and heart failure, affecting the quality of life and taking on high healthcare cost. Currently, there is no standard pharmacological treatment for this condition, and the management includes a conservative approach and supportive care. Everolimus has shown positive effects on subependymal giant cell astrocytomas, renal angiomyolipoma and refractory seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. However, evidence supporting efficacy in symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyoma is limited to case reports. The ORACLE trial is the first randomised clinical trial assessing the efficacy of everolimus as a specific therapy for symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyoma. METHODS: ORACLE is a phase II, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre protocol trial. A total of 40 children with symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyoma secondary to tuberous sclerosis complex will be randomised to receive oral everolimus or placebo for 3 months. The primary outcome is 50% or more reduction in the tumour size related to baseline. As secondary outcomes we include the presence of arrhythmias, pericardial effusion, intracardiac obstruction, adverse events, progression of tumour reduction and effect on heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: ORACLE protocol addresses a relevant unmet need in children with tuberous sclerosis complex and cardiac rhabdomyoma. The results of the trial will potentially support the first evidence-based therapy for this condition.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Everolimo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Cardíacas/tratamento farmacológico , Rabdomioma/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Tuberosa/complicações , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Método Duplo-Cego , Everolimo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cardíacas/complicações , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Rabdomioma/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos
8.
Adv Ther ; 36(11): 3030-3046, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31612359

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain. METHODS: This was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score ≥ 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane-SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively. RESULTS: Between 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference - 5.94 mm; 95% CI - 8.83, - 3.06 mm), moderate pain (- 5.97 mm; 95% CI - 9.55, - 2.39 mm) and severe pain (- 5.54 mm; 95% CI - 10.49, - 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated "Excellent", "Very Good" or "Good" by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered with EudraCT (2017-001565-25) on 2 March 2018 and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585374) on 13 July 2018. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/dietoterapia , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Dor Aguda/etiologia , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 60(6): 718-722, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27701370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated that early recoil is frequently observed in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intra-arterial administration of iloprost (Endoprost®, Italfarmaco S.p.A., Milan, Italy) on early elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty of below-the-knee (BTK) vessels in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2015 32 patients with CLI underwent balloon angioplasty of at least one BTK vessel followed by intra-arterial administration of iloprost. Early elastic recoil was defined as residual lumen compromise >10%. Early elastic recoil was determined on the basis of minimal lumen diameter (MLD) measurements at baseline (MLDbaseline), immediately after BTK balloon angioplasty (MLDpostdilation), and 15 minutes thereafter (MLD15min). RESULTS: Patients were predominantly female (18/32, 56.2%) with a mean age of 79.6 years (range 68-87). Most of the patients were diabetics (25/32, 78.1%). An occlusion was present in 24 cases (75%). Mean BTK lesion length was 144.1 mm (range 22-320). Mean MLD measurements were 0.1 mm (range 0-0.5; MLDbaseline), 2.5 mm (range 1.9-3; MLDpostdilation), and 1.9 mm (range 0.7-3; MLD15min). Early elastic recoil was recorded in 14 patients (43.8%). The mean percentage of elastic recoil after 15 minutes was 21.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience intra-arterial administration of iloprost reduces the risk of early elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty of BTK vessels in patients with CLI. Further analyses with larger population studies and randomized trials are needed to validate this therapeutic option.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Iloprosta/administração & dosagem , Isquemia/terapia , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estado Terminal , Elasticidade , Feminino , Humanos , Iloprosta/efeitos adversos , Injeções Intra-Arteriais , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos
11.
Adv Ther ; 36(1): 244-256, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30467809

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Low-dose methoxyflurane, administered via a hand-held inhaler, has been used for short-term pain relief in emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand for over 40 years, and was recently approved in Europe for the rapid relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults. There is currently a lack of data for methoxyflurane versus active comparators, therefore this trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of inhaled methoxyflurane compared with standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of acute trauma-related pain in pre-hospital and ED settings in Italy. METHODS: MEDITA (Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly) is a Phase IIIb, prospective, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre trial. A total of 272 adult patients with moderate-to-severe pain [score ≥ 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)] due to limb trauma will be randomised 1:1 to receive 3 mL methoxyflurane (self-administered by the patient via inhalation under supervision of a trained person) or medications that currently comprise the SoC in Italy [intravenous (IV) morphine for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol or ketoprofen for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)], administered as soon as possible after randomisation. PLANNED OUTCOMES: Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline (time of randomisation) and at intervals up to 30 min. Time of onset of pain relief as reported by the patient and use of rescue medication will be recorded. The patient will rate the efficacy and the healthcare professional will rate the practicality of study treatment at 30 min after randomisation using a 5-point Likert scale. Adverse events will be recorded until safety follow-up at 14 ± 2 days. Vital signs will be measured at baseline, 10 and 30 min. The primary aim is to demonstrate non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus SoC for the change in VAS pain intensity from baseline (randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-001565-25. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03585374. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals srl.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Anestésicos Inalatórios/uso terapêutico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
12.
Adv Ther ; 35(11): 2081-2092, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30374805

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The inhalational analgesic low-dose methoxyflurane has been widely used by Australian ambulance services since 1975 and is now approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in conscious adult patients. The use of methoxyflurane in hostile environments is of special interest given its portability, ease of use and rapid onset of action. This trial will investigate the efficacy, tolerability and practicality of use of inhaled methoxyflurane in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain rescued from hostile mountainous environments by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) in Italy. METHODS: METEORA is a phase IIIb, prospective, single-arm, multicentre trial. Approximately 200 adult patients with a pain score of at least 4 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) due to limb trauma rescued by HEMS will be enrolled. Patients will receive up to 2 × 3 mL methoxyflurane, self-administered by the patient by inhalation under medical supervision. Rescue medication will be permitted if required. PLANNED OUTCOMES: Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after the start of methoxyflurane inhalation and when positioning the patient on a spinal board or stretcher; and also using the NRS at enrolment and at 10 min. Use of rescue medication (yes/no) will be recorded. The patient will rate efficacy and the healthcare professional will rate practicality of methoxyflurane treatment at 30 and 60 min using a 5-point Likert scale. Vital signs will be measured at baseline, 10, 30 and 60 min. Assessments after 30 min will only be performed for patients using a second inhaler. Adverse events will be recorded until safety follow-up at 3 ± 1 days. The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients achieving at least 30% improvement from baseline in VAS pain intensity within the first 10 min of methoxyflurane administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-004601-40. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, srl. Plain language summary available for this article.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Aeronaves , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Aguda/etiologia , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Autoadministração/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Adv Nonlinear Stud ; 17(2): 297-310, 2017 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37727771

RESUMO

We consider nonnegative solutions to -Δ⁢u=f⁢(u) in half-planes and strips, under zero Dirichlet boundary condition. Exploiting a rotating and sliding line technique, we prove symmetry and monotonicity properties of the solutions, under very general assumptions on the nonlinearity f. In fact, we provide a unified approach that works in all cases: f⁢(0)<0, f⁢(0)=0 or f⁢(0)>0.Furthermore, we make the effort to deal with nonlinearities f that may be not locally-Lipschitz continuous.We also provide explicit examples showing the sharpness of our assumptions on the nonlinear function f.

15.
Rheumatol Int ; 37(2): 245-249, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27796521

RESUMO

Intravenous iloprost is a first-line option for the treatment of scleroderma-related digital vasculopathy, and some studies have suggested its favourable role on disease progression. The aim of our study is to evaluate the disease progression, specifically in terms of cardiopulmonary function, in a group of consecutive patients chronically treated with intravenous iloprost. Our retrospective study enrolled 68 scleroderma patients (68 F, 54.4 ± 12.3 years) treated with iloprost for 7.1 ± 2.9 years, with a schedule of 5-6 consecutive daily infusions per month (6 h/day, 0.5-2.0 ng/kg/min). In all patients, modified Rodnan skin score (4.7 ± 5.3 vs. 3.7 ± 5.3, p < 0.0001), systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) (30.9 ± 6.4 vs. 24.0 ± 3.2 mmHg, p < 0.0001), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (22.1 ± 2.4 vs. 23.8 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.0001), pro-brain natriuretic peptide (97.2 ± 69.3 vs. 65.8 ± 31.7 pg/ml, p = 0.0005) showed statistically significant improvement from baseline. In the subgroup of patients with baseline sPAP ≥36 mmHg (n = 17), a significant sPAP reduction was observed (from 39.5 ± 3.8 to 25.1 ± 4.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001) after 7.6 ± 2.5 years of follow-up. The number of patients with digital ulcers (DUs) at follow-up was reduced from baseline (42.6 vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001), and none of the free-DU patients at baseline presented DUs at follow-up. An intensive and chronic regimen of IV iloprost administration seems to stabilize and potentially improve the long-term development of disease in SSc patients, as suggested by stabilization or significant improvement of cardiopulmonary parameters and vasculopathy.


Assuntos
Iloprosta/uso terapêutico , Doença de Raynaud/tratamento farmacológico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Úlcera Cutânea/tratamento farmacológico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Iloprosta/administração & dosagem , Infusões Intravenosas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Raynaud/etiologia , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Úlcera Cutânea/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem
16.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas ; 6: 139-44, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26056502

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Administration of intravenous iloprost - a first-line European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-recommended choice for the treatment of scleroderma (SSc)-related digital vasculopathy - requires repeated treatment cycles of 6 hours per day in a hospital setting. During the infusion, patient mobility is considerably restricted due to the size and fixity of traditional syringe pumps. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction level of patients and nurses, after the introduction of a new portable syringe pump (Infonde(®), Italfarmaco S.p.A., Milan, Italy) at the Department of Rheumatology, Magenta Hospital, Milan, Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive SSc patients receiving stable therapy with iloprost, previously administered with a fixed pump, were treated using the portable Infonde(®) pump. Patients (n=34) and nurses (n=4) were asked to answer a nine- and six-item questionnaire, respectively, to assess the satisfaction of the administration comparing the new device versus the previous one. The health care staff of the ward developed the questionnaire, and the response scores ranged from 0 (fixed device better) to 10 (portable device better); thus a score >5 indicates a preference for Infonde(®). RESULTS: Patients' answers indicated a preference towards the new portable syringe pump, versus the previous fixed pump. Questionnaires administered to patients generated a total of 306 responses, with over 95% of the responses in the range 8-10, of which 89% had a score equal to 10. The responses of nurses showed a score equal to 10 in 100% cases. No significant adverse events were recorded, indicating no change in the tolerability profile of the drug. CONCLUSION: Iloprost administration with Infonde(®) pump was preferred by both patients and health care professionals, and was well tolerated. The possibility to perform daily activities and the freedom of movement suggest a positive impact of Infonde(®) on the treatment, with a potential favorable effect on the quality of life of patients during the many hours spent receiving the infusion.

17.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(1): 110-5, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25612845

RESUMO

AIMS: Transdermal fentanyl is a well established treatment for cancer pain. The aim of the present study is to assess the relative bioavailability of fentanyl from two different transdermal systems by evaluating plasma drug concentrations after single administration of Fentalgon® (test), a novel bilayer matrix type patch, and Durogesic SMAT (reference), a monolayer matrix type patch. In the Fentalgon patch the upper 6% fentanyl reservoir layer maintains a stable concentration gradient between the lower 4% donor layer and the skin. The system provides a constant drug delivery over 72 h. METHODS: This was an open label, single centre, randomized, single dose, two period crossover clinical trial, that included 36 healthy male volunteers. The patches were applied to non-irritated and non-irradiated skin on the intraclavicular pectoral area. Blood samples were collected at different time points (from baseline to 120 h post-removal of the devices) and fentanyl concentrations were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Bioequivalence was to be claimed if the 90% confidence interval of AUC(0,t) and C(max) ratios (test: reference) were within the acceptance range of 80-125% and 75-133%, respectively. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals of the AUC(0,t) ratio (116.3% [109.6, 123.4%]) and C(max) ratio (114.4% [105.8, 123.8%] were well included in the acceptance range and the C(max) ratio also met the narrower bounds of 80-125%. There was no relevant difference in overall safety profiles of the two preparations investigated, which were adequately tolerated, as expected for opioid-naïve subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The new bilayer matrix type patch, Fentalgon®, is bioequivalent to the monolayer matrix type Durogesic SMAT fentanyl patch with respect to the rate and extent of exposure of fentanyl (Eudra/CT no. 2005-000046-36).


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Fentanila/farmacocinética , Adesivo Transdérmico , Administração Cutânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/sangue , Disponibilidade Biológica , Estudos Cross-Over , Fentanila/sangue , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...