A comparative study of the curriculum in master degree of medical education in Iran and some selected countries.

BACKGROUND: When training efficient human resources for the health system, it is necessary to train appropriate student teaching and assessment methods and necessary skills for educational planning and evaluation. Therefore, studies and efforts to train human resources in the field of Iranian medical education have begun since 1994. The aim of the present study is a comparative study of the curriculum in master's degree of medical education in Iran and some selected countries. METHODS: This is applied, descriptive and comparative research. Data were collected by electronic search on the website of the selected universities. Each of these selected educational curricula, the newest curriculum of the studied universities at the time of the present research, was translated into fluent Persian and studied in detail. The model used in the present study is the famous Polish Bereday model. A quota sampling method was used and universities were selected at a 1:10 ratio from each classified area. Institutions that offered master's degrees in medical education were chosen in each region using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification based on QS World University Rankings (2020). The data collection instrument was a researcher-made checklist, which was used to extract the relevant data available on the website of selected universities. This checklist consisted of eight items, which included course title, course length, mission, vision, goals, admission process, teaching methods (online, In-person, and both), educational strategies, teaching methods, and student assessment. These eight items were compared at selected universities. RESULTS: The samples included seven selected universities including Kebangsaan University in Asia, the University of Toronto in Canada, the University of Michigan in America, the University of Bern and Imperial College in Europe, Monash University in Australia, and Iranian universities. Student admission in Iran is carried out through a centralized exam; therefore, most faculties do not have the option to select students and criteria for student selection. The course length in all universities is between 1-3 years (depending on part-time/full-time) and most of the studied universities offer this field as modular degree courses. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of the curriculum for the master's degree of medical education in Iran and selected countries showed the differences and similarities of this course among the top universities of different continents. Unlike other countries, the curriculum for a master's degree in medical education in Iran is offered in a centralized manner in eight universities of Tehran, Shahid Beheshti, Iran, Isfahan, Shiraz, Tabriz, Kerman, and Mashhad.

A conceptual model for practice-based learning and improvement competency in medicine.

Introduction: Quality improvement and performance evaluation have become today's mainstream medical issues, whereas in many areas of medical care, the quality of care services is less than desirable. Objective: To determine a conceptual model for practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) competency in medicine. Methods: This study was conducted using Walker and Avant's theoretical synthesis method. Articles related to the concept of PBLI were searched using the keywords of practice-based learning and improvement, quality improvement, core competency, medical education, practice-based learning in English, separately and combined in google, google scholar, and Pubmed databases. After identifying the theoretical blocks and variables of each block and communicating them, a visual model of PBLI was presented. After a focused search for each block, a total of 229 full papers were studied and the PBLI model was developed in six conceptual blocks. Results: The visual model that presented in this study shows the relation among six theoretical blocks of PBLI including: Block of approach to PBLI, PBLI process triggers block, gap bridging solutions, PBLI infrastructure block, PBLI sub-competencies block, PBLI academic development block. Conclusions: Nowadays, PBLI is one of the inevitable qualities of medicine that ensures the quality of medical practice, which, in addition to individual requirements, requires a series of technical, strategic, structural, and cultural infrastructures. By utilizing this capability, a physician will be able to discover the knowledge, skills, and performance gaps, and will be able to cope up with their appropriate approaches, thereby improving the quality of their medicine and the care provided and the patient's safety. It can provide satisfaction and trust in society. The model presented in this paper makes it easy to understand the relationships between the various components of this competency.