Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to a flexible fiberoptic scope for intubation with cervical spine immobilization.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the standard flexible fiberoptic scope (FFS) with an eye piece (but without a camera or a video screen) for intubation of patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with manual inline stabilization. The primary end point was the time to achieve successful tracheal intubation. Secondary end points included glottic view at intubation and number of intubation attempts. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. SETTING: Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA. PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-III), aged 18 to 80years undergoing elective cervical spine surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo tracheal intubation using either an FFS (n=70) or the C-MAC video laryngoscope (n=70). MEASUREMENTS: After performing a preoperative airway evaluation, patients underwent a standardized induction sequence. The glottic view was assessed at the time of tracheal tube placement using the Cormack-Lehane and percentage of glottic opening scoring systems. In addition, the time required for successful insertion of the tracheal tube, number of intubation attempts to secure the airway, the need for adjuvant airway devices, hemodynamic changes, adverse events, and any airway-related trauma were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: The glottic view at the time of intubation did not differ significantly with the 2 devices; however, the C-MAC facilitated more rapid tracheal intubation compared with the FFS (P=.001). The peak heart rate response following insertion of the tracheal tube was also reduced (P=.004) in the C-MAC (vs FFS) group. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC may offer an advantage over the FFS with respect to the time required to obtain glottic view and successful placement of the tracheal tube in patients requiring cervical spine immobilization.

Incidence and Demographics of Post-Operative Naloxone Administration: A 13-Year Experience at a Major Tertiary Teaching Institution.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative use of opioids is associated with the risk of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Naloxone is a competitive opioid antagonist typically administered to reverse opioid-induced respiratory depression. Postoperative administration of naloxone may be considered a proxy for significant postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression and data regarding its use may be utilized as a quality measure. Few large studies have been done to characterize the population and define an incidence of naloxone recipients in the postoperative inpatient setting. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize the demographics of patients receiving postoperative naloxone, as well as the incidence of administration in the first 72 post-operative hours at a large urban academic medical center in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Major urban tertiary teaching institution. METHODS: The robust electronic record database of The Department of Anesthesiology at The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, as well as the institution's data warehouse were instrumental in allowing almost 450,000 surgical cases performed between 2001 and 2014 to be screened for naloxone administration within the first 72 postoperative hours. Organ harvests, outside of OR intubations, cancelled cases, and patients age less than or equal to 18 were excluded from the total case count. RESULTS: Naloxone was administered 433 times in a total of 442,699 postoperative cases. This yielded an incidence of 0.1%. Additionally, the demographics of the group receiving naloxone were described. The mean age was 60, mean body mass index (BMI) was 27, 60% were women, and the mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status was 3. Average time to naloxone administration was 21 hours (standard deviation 7) after surgery. Thirteen percent of the cases were emergent. Breakdown of anesthetic technique revealed that 81% of the cases were performed under general anesthesia, 7% with monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and 12% under neuraxial anesthesia. This study lays the groundwork for further elucidating risk factors for postoperative administration of naloxone. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of postoperative naloxone administration over a 13 year period in approximately 450,000 patients was 0.1%. Demographics of this group were older, ASA 3 women, qualifying as overweight, but not obese, undergoing elective surgery with a general anesthetic technique. Average time to administration was 21 hours postoperatively.