Comorbidities, Sociodemographic Factors, and Hospitalizations in Outpatients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) tend to be older and have a high co-morbidity burden. The impact of co-morbid conditions and sociodemographic risk factors on outcomes in these patients has not been quantified. We evaluated 445 consecutive outpatients with HFpEF, defined as established diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation >40% and no previous left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. Patients with specific cardiomyopathies, congenital heart disease, primary right-sided disease, valvular disease, or previous advanced HF therapies were excluded. After 2 years, there were 44 deaths and 609 all-cause hospitalizations; of these, 260 (42.7%) were cardiovascular hospitalizations, including HF, and 173 (28.4%) were specifically for HF. The highest attributable risk for hospitalizations was associated with marital status (single, divorced, and widowed had higher hospitalization rates compared with married patients), hypoalbuminemia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and renal dysfunction. The proportion of hospitalizations potentially attributable to these factors was 66.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.4 to 74.4) for all-cause hospitalizations, 76.9% (95% CI 65.2 to 84.6) for cardiovascular hospitalizations, and 83.0% (95% CI 70.3 to 90.3) for HF hospitalizations. For composite end points, the proportion was 46.9% (95% CI 34.0% to 57.3%) for death or all-cause hospitalization, 45.7% (95% CI 29.3% to 58.2%) for death or cardiovascular hospitalization, and 43.7% (95% CI 24.2% to 58.2%) for death or HF-related hospitalization. In conclusion, among outpatients with HFpEF, most hospitalizations could be attributed to co-morbidities and sociodemographic factors. Effects of HF therapies on hospitalizations and related end points may be difficult to demonstrate in these patients. Multidisciplinary approaches are more likely to impact hospitalizations in HFpEF.

Pulmonary function testing and outcomes in subjects with heart failure listed for heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Impaired spirometric parameters have been reported in patients with stage C heart failure and portend worse outcomes in these patients. The impact of spirometric parameters on outcomes in patients with stage D heart failure listed for heart transplantation is unknown. METHODS: We collected data on consecutive subjects listed for heart transplantation and examined the association of FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC with (1) death or left ventricular assist device implantation (primary end point) and (2) death, left ventricular assist device implantation, or urgent transplantation (secondary end point). In a secondary analysis, we examined the association of baseline spirometry with post-transplant outcomes. RESULTS: Among 187 subjects (53 ± 10 y old, 17.1% women, 69.5% white subjects, 28.9% black subjects), there were 19 deaths, 28 left ventricular assist device implantations, and 74 urgent transplantations (primary end point of 25.1%, secondary end point of 64.7%) after a median of 5.5 months (interquartile range of 2.3-15.2). For FEV1, the hazard ratios for the primary and secondary end points were 0.93 (95% CI 0.61-1.41, P = .72) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.72-1.21, P = .62) per L, respectively. The hazard ratios of FVC were 0.90 (95% CI 0.65-1.25, P = .52) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.76-1.13, P = .43) per L, respectively. Impairment patterns (obstructive, restrictive, mixed) were not associated with risk for events. There was no interaction of spirometric parameters with smoking or lung disease for outcomes. Baseline spirometry was not associated with perioperative 30-d mortality (1.4%) and 1-y post-transplant survival (97.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to stage C subjects with heart failure, spirometric parameters were not associated with outcomes in this homogeneous stage D heart failure population.